MisterF
Senior Member
I'm not quite sure what you're arguing here. That because we look better than Mumbai that's good enough? That we should strive to look like a city where most of the people don't have indoor plumbing?Ah, c'mon Mister F -- Forgotten is totally adding to the conversation, albeit not in the 'sky is falling' mode that is the norm on this thread. I do appreciate Armour's epic rant -- it's for that kind of belly-laugh-inducing screed that I occasionally dip into this thread.
Toronto is a beautiful city with lots of construction activity, and sometimes those two goals don't quite match up with what some UT aesthetes wish to have happen. This thread gives them the chance to vent -- would you rather they took up a sandwich board in NPS? (Actually... that'd be kind of fun to see. "I'm marching until we get bronze streetlamps at least out to the Queensway!")
That the rest of us occasionally make fun of over-the-top rants about how the 'city just doesn't care' is just grist for the mill...
Toronto isn't a beautiful city. It's vibrant, creative, and economically powerful but beautiful it isn't. Architecturally we're no Paris and there's nothing wrong with that...and there's not much we can do about it for our existing building stock anyway. But there's no reason that we can't have the same streetscape standards as any of the great cities of the world. We can have wider sidewalks made of something other than poured concrete, at least in busy areas. We can hide our hydro wires. We can have better street furniture and landscaping. In short, we don't have to settle "better than Jakarta".