Brandon716
Senior Member
^^Interesting episode.
Obviously not. I've watched many movies like that (every single one after the first against my will,) and they all end in the same thing: all non-believers are idiots, and the new world government wants to do completely illogical things... because they're evil I guess?If i wasn't 100% sure that this was an inside job i wouldn't be posting like this. Watch the whole video and see what you think.
They may have also felt secure, that regardless of what damning revelations were contained in the FDR data, no mainstream media outlet would give them ink or air time, keeping the official story intact for the vast majority of Americans who receive their news from mainstream sources.
Obviously not. I've watched many movies like that (every single one after the first against my will,) and they all end in the same thing: all non-believers are idiots, and the new world government wants to do completely illogical things... because they're evil I guess?
You see, there's an interesting thing about these conspiracy theories.
I'll just put an example up here. So a community spots what they think is a flying saucer spinning up over their city. Being the gullible americans quick to come to whacky conclusions (no offense to any americans, of course,) they are, they suddenly jump on the idea that the air force was doing secret military testing with alien technology! However, the air force says it was just a weather balloon. Now, it's not just alien technology testing, it's a government cover up!
The irony here is that it was just a weather balloon.
EDIT: Actually, I'd love to see a government official who gets confronted with the whole "it's a conzpirazy!" thing and says, "Yes, in fact, we were doing some tests with the model 536's that day. Sorry for the disruption everyone!"
I could honestly see the benefits in the government being in on 9/11. The points about the FBI or whatever drilling into the support structure so they could lay explosive and all that are really quite absurd though. I believe that, like they say with the christmas bombings, they had the information but did not act on it. It was probably just a lottery win on Bush's part, and so when it happened, he just said "let's not go through with it and advance our agenda further."
The biggest logical flaw that needs to be addressed here is this: why would they spend months upon months of meticulously destroying the structure, when they could have just crashed into it in the first place? If you're going to say that it's because the towers could have withstood two planes crashing into them, I'll ask you to get a degree in physics before making those assertions. And even if they couldn't bring them down, the planes could have just been conveniently carrying a bunch of nitro (for pharmaceutical purposes, I assume,) couldn't they?
So back on my point, what exactly would these secret world governments have to gain by doing something like global warming? You do realize that it would require a bunch of people (mostly americans, once again,) to switch to low carbon lifestyles when they're perfectly comfortable doing nothing, right? Why would the government want to have to do all that work and spend that money to accomplish pretty much nothing (except, you know, saving the world and all.)
If i wasn't 100% sure that this was an inside job i wouldn't be posting like this. Watch the whole video and see what you think.
If you are 100% sure, please provide the evidence. You know, the stuff that provides clear proof for the actions of people, shows exactly what they did and how they did it. Also, a list of everyone involved and their specific motives would be nice. Sources of evidence would also be good (so they can be verified, examined and so on).
There is a difference between believing in something and having actual verifiable proof that can examined and tested.
I've heard that much of the US gov't' gold inventory is actually missing, well, not missing but sold off.The evidence? How about those missing gold bars beneath the world trade centre?
The evidence? How about those missing gold bars beneath the world trade centre?