Irishmonk
Senior Member
I haven't been in a government library for over a decade.
I'm not sure I've ever been in a "government" library, but I use my local public library on a frequent basis.
I haven't been in a government library for over a decade.
While I agree with with your sarcastic reply (and side stepping the cause of tuition increases), my first sentence in the previous post was a personal account.
My argument is that…
Libraries can work for people who want them and not at the expense of others who do not want them. It's a win win situation that can meet everyone's needs.
Many discussions in this thread talks about the pros and cons of a public library system but getting rid of the public library isn't the issue at hand. I live where there's a library within 10 minutes walk, another within 20 walk and a third within 25 min walk. It wouldn't be a devastation to literacy within the community if one of them were to close.
If all of the branches are being heavily used, why close any of them? The city is growing so, if anything, we'll need more libraries in the future to keep up with demand.
Many discussions in this thread talks about the pros and cons of a public library system but getting rid of the public library isn't the issue at hand. I live where there's a library within 10 minutes walk, another within 20 walk and a third within 25 min walk. It wouldn't be a devastation to literacy within the community if one of them were to close.
I'm not as convinced as some of you that demand is increasing because I have not seen the data. Surely population is growing but as others have already said, with the eBooks and Internet use growing, the need for physical libraries decreases. I can go to TPL right now and download an eBook online 24/7 or find out the population of Austria on the Web without stepping foot in a branch.
I assume the library keeps metrics on borrowings through the years and would be interested in seeing this to confirm assertions of increasing overall demand. Anecdotally, I don't see that crowds at my main library to be any greater than 20 or 30 years ago. In fact, I see less.
How would you do this without violating Section 23(1) of the Ontario Public Libraries Act. which clearly states "A board shall not make a charge for admission to a public library or for use in the library of the library's materials"Nominal user-fees (something like a $10 annual "membership" for adults, $2 for children) could also be imposed on a yearly basis on people who check out materials from the library to contribute to the cost of running them.
It could be devastating for a busy student who already has to wait 30 minutes to use a computer. With fewer libraries, people will have to wait even longer. If drivers on Jarvis, can't take 5 minutes longer to get home, why should library users have to wait much longer than that, to use a library service? Why are drivers treated special? Isn't that why we are paying 200,000 dollars to take out the cycling lane? I'd call that a double standard.
Well, case in point, me. Before I got a home computer/internet access a decade ago, I spent at least 20 hours a week at my local library. Then, with internet connection at home, I still used the library at least twice a month until 2006.
No longer.
The library is--sad to say--almost pointless these days, unless you're interested in trying to pick up chicks or need to use the bathroom or find some obscure reference material/out of print book.
So today, I use the library less than once a year.
I'm not as convinced as some of you that demand is increasing because I have not seen the data.
Check out the Toronto Public Library website and the Toronto Public Library Board minutes. All the data you of which you speak is publicly available.