AlvinofDiaspar
Moderator
Your opinion isn't as unpopular as you might think. Yonge is down right embarrassing, and the sooner it is completely reimagined and cleaned up, the better. I've said this before, and I'll say it again, "heritage" designation should be an exception (that is; to denote an "exceptional" building), rather than the norm. We can't just label half of Yonge as "heritage," because that would make us complacent (incidentally, complacency seems like a perfect descriptor of someone as afraid of change as Adma).
Just how would designating the half of Yonge deserving of heritage designation (notwithstanding your interpretation of what heritage should be) result in complacency? Is restoring the heritage facade and selective, sensitive densification "complacent"? Painting the view that there is more than individual buildings worth preserving over wholesale, carte blanche redevelopment is complacent and "anti-change" is intellectual dishonesty (let's put aside the worth of redevelopment projects aside, even).
AoD