DeathSilver
Active Member
It's one thing to wish him harm or even death in this case, it's another thing to not be able to feel sympathy and offer respect to a toxic man like Rob Ford. It's just a very hard thing to do.
After he insults them?
It's one thing to wish him harm or even death in this case, it's another thing to not be able to feel sympathy and offer respect to a toxic man like Rob Ford. It's just a very hard thing to do.
It's one thing to wish him harm or even death in this case, it's another thing to not be able to feel sympathy and offer respect to a toxic man like Rob Ford. It's just a very hard thing to do.
Physician here - going back to the nature of this tumour, there's very little that's good about the information released so far. A few points:
1) Ford supposedly had some sort of appendiceal "tumour" resected in 2009, along with what sounds like a partial cecal resection. I have no idea what exactly this was since we have nothing more than Rob's description. It doesn't sound like any kind of malignancy, but tumours of the appendix aren't common and when they do occur can be very aggressive.
2) If this new "fair-sized" tumour is colorectal in origin, it begs the question of why he wasn't scoped. That, at least, is my understanding, as the reports suggest only imaging - and an image-guided biopsy. Colonoscopy would be the first choice to get tissue but it's possible it was attempted and it wasn't successful. And if a colonic mass is big enough to be seen on CT, it's going to be at least locally-advanced. Since Ford is now admitted to a surgeon who does colorectal exclusively, it stands to reason that's where this thing is, but it also probably isn't a "normal" colorectal cancer.
3) While a biopsy is conventionally understood as determining whether a tumour is "benign" or "malignant", usually we can tell that from imaging alone. What a biopsy provides is information about the type of tumour, and the delay in getting path results come from various special stains, immunofluorescence, and assessment of molecular markers that come with a more comprehensive study.
4) Overall I'm still not sure what's going on, but it's unusual to present with pain in the absence of obstruction or perforation. If either of those had happened, he'd already have gone to the OR. But with his younger age, prior appendiceal something, and symptoms, I'd wonder about a peritoneal malignancy either primary or secondary. It could also be a neuroendocrine tumour, some of which can be very aggressive and fast growing. Either way, once the biopsy results are back (along with whatever kind of "lung biopsy" he had) his case will go to a multidisciplinary tumour board and they'll decide on a plan.
None of this is compatible with an election.
Perhaps he should explain as to whether he intend to release his book instead? RFMG doesn't profit from their activism, not sure if that's true for Towhey.
AoD
Rofo ran up multiple flights of stairs at Don Mills station on Sept 8.
How many days ago was that?
Wormtongue is describing "cancer" symptoms, is he? Or something else?
Just want to get my timelines right.
There's probably nothing of any worth in MT book anyway.
Plus late diagnosis is pretty common too, and general malaise is often blamed on something else until it is way too late.
Exactly. My best friend was diagnosed with stage 4 hodgkins at the age of 23. She was a work hard/play hard woman and only went to the doctor when she could no longer attribute her malaise to lifestyle. She lived 6 years, but it was an incredible battle with a known end. Again, I think Rob is in bad shape and has quite a battle ahead of him. I have worked in hospitals in a corporate capacity and I can't imagine that at reputable teaching hospital like Sinai would engage in the nonsense that people are suggesting. There is no litigation risk, but there is a significant reputational risk.
Physician here - going back to the nature of this tumour, there's very little that's good about the information released so far. A few points:
1) Ford supposedly had some sort of appendiceal "tumour" resected in 2009, along with what sounds like a partial cecal resection. I have no idea what exactly this was since we have nothing more than Rob's description. It doesn't sound like any kind of malignancy, but tumours of the appendix aren't common and when they do occur can be very aggressive.
2) If this new "fair-sized" tumour is colorectal in origin, it begs the question of why he wasn't scoped. That, at least, is my understanding, as the reports suggest only imaging - and an image-guided biopsy. Colonoscopy would be the first choice to get tissue but it's possible it was attempted and it wasn't successful. And if a colonic mass is big enough to be seen on CT, it's going to be at least locally-advanced. Since Ford is now admitted to a surgeon who does colorectal exclusively, it stands to reason that's where this thing is, but it also probably isn't a "normal" colorectal cancer.
3) While a biopsy is conventionally understood as determining whether a tumour is "benign" or "malignant", usually we can tell that from imaging alone. What a biopsy provides is information about the type of tumour, and the delay in getting path results come from various special stains, immunofluorescence, and assessment of molecular markers that come with a more comprehensive study.
4) Overall I'm still not sure what's going on, but it's unusual to present with pain in the absence of obstruction or perforation. If either of those had happened, he'd already have gone to the OR. But with his younger age, prior appendiceal something, and symptoms, I'd wonder about a peritoneal malignancy either primary or secondary. It could also be a neuroendocrine tumour, some of which can be very aggressive and fast growing. Either way, once the biopsy results are back (along with whatever kind of "lung biopsy" he had) his case will go to a multidisciplinary tumour board and they'll decide on a plan.
None of this is compatible with an election.
Interesting that hair loss is already occurring. That fast? Really?
I have worked in hospitals in a corporate capacity and I can't imagine that at reputable teaching hospital like Sinai would engage in the nonsense that people are suggesting. There is no litigation risk, but there is a significant reputational risk.
I was just looking at Warren Kinsella's blog - there's a comment on there about a political insider whose sources are saying Rob's cancer has spread from the original tumour and he has already had radiation treatments. If true, then hair loss would be expected.
Interesting that hair loss is already occurring. That fast? Really?