JWBF
Senior Member
This is untrue. There actually IS a clinical difference between crack and powder cocaine in terms of the intensity/duration of the high due to method of delivery. Several studies show that the onset of the high is much faster with crack cocaine and the duration is much shorter. That has led to a lot of speculation that it is more addictive than powder cocaine but I haven't seen a definitive study on that.
There are also side products produced during pyrolysis of crack that differentiate it from powder cocaine - there are literally different chemicals that are ingested when crack is smoked (notably methylester derivatives). I have no idea what impact that has on addictiveness, but I do suspect that these chemicals make crack more toxicologically damaging to the human body than does powder cocaine.
Lower cost and a high similar to freebasing.
IIRC, beyond shouting out "subways, subways, subways" and that one meeting with developers in his office, I'm not sure he did ANY serious work on the matter. My take on Ford was (and is) he could care less if we didn't build ANY mass transit at all. All he wanted was a smooth drive for his Escalade.
Mass transit for the "masses", roads are for the "accomplished".