News   Jul 05, 2024
 916     0 
News   Jul 05, 2024
 1.1K     12 
News   Jul 05, 2024
 523     0 

Rob Ford's Toronto

Status
Not open for further replies.
Caught a guy this morning on the 508 watching Ezra Levant's screed about the Media Party on his iphone.

Yes folks, Ford Nation still exists.

As an aside, I wonder if Levant directed any of his venom towards his own employer, given that they had Fordgate on their front page for four consecutive days.
 
I think everyone that has been following this can see that things are not going to end well (at least not legally) for Rob, but what I am really curious about now is how all of this is going to impact Doug. I can't imagine that his aspiration for greater political power could ever come to pass now, though I've been surprised by that sort of thing before. What do you guys think will happen to him as this continues to play out? Will he eventually turn on Rob and have the family offer him up as a sacrifice as the really awful stuff surfaces? Will he do whatever he has to do to keep his brother in power as long as possible? Will he end up in legal trouble? More and more Doug becomes the interesting story for me.
 
I agree. I know old Toronto money, and they would never have let their loose-canon spawn any where near public life. They'd also never be caught dead on CP24, airing their laundry. She screams new money to me.

She screams "some money" to me...more like a small man complex. Look at how the family berates the downtown elite and Doug's tirade against the Thompson family after the G&M story. The Fords think they are powerful in a traditional sense.
 
Caught a guy this morning on the 508 watching Ezra Levant's screed about the Media Party on his iphone.

I watched it, and I'm FAAAAR from Ford Nation. I live downtown, intentionally don't own a car, use transit, would bike if it were actually safe in this city (I know too many who've been injured) and vote NDP. Oh, and about once a month, I like a latté.

That said, I read and watch articles from media from all over the political spectrum. Isolating yourself to one side only serves dogmatic purposes. Knowledge and opinion can (and should) be welcomed from any direction it comes, as long as you ingest it criticality.
 
Gord Perks letter to a "taxpayer": bolding is mine.

So I wrote my councillor, Gord Perks, following Rob Ford's radio show apology on Sunday - so before the crack smoking admission. I asked him what his plans were to keep Toronto moving forward. He sent me this today:
Many people are asking me to work to remove Mayor Ford from office. To the core of my being I believe it should not be up to elected officials to remove each other from office.
It is axiomatic that in a democracy the community elects its government. It must also be up to the community to remove its government and replace it with another – through elections. Anything that displaces the electorate's power to choose its government is anti-democratic. Further, our system wisely allows for a range of different points of view in government. If we allow elected officials to force each other out of office, we risk having elected officials who oppose the majority view being pushed out of office. History is replete with examples of how bad that is for a society.
Both before and during the previous election, it was clear that Rob Ford was racist, homophobic, and had problems with substance abuse and honesty. Nevertheless he won the election. We, all of us who care about justice and democracy, need to ask ourselves why this happened.
I have what I believe is part of the answer. It is increasingly common for people and institutions to succumb to anger, resentment, and an urge to punish government for real and perceived failings. Ironically, it was this very anger that helped elect Rob Ford Mayor. Recall the relentless attacks he made as a Councillor and mayoralty candidate on factually small but symbolically large uses of Councillor's office budgets, and his mantra about ending the so called "Gravy Train".
This style of politics draws on the slogans of people like Ronald Regan who said "Government is the problem" and Margaret Thatcher who said "There is no alternative". Nonsense! Government is the tool we build together to solve problems. Its precise function is to find alternatives that bring us to a better future. Theirs is a politics of resentment and anger. Reject it.
When we succumb to that anger, important questions about how to build the City we want are lost and forgotten. For the record, I am not immune to this anger. Over three years of resisting the ugliest parts of the Mayor's assault on good governance I have on occasion lost my temper and have twice decided I had to apologise to Council. Frequently, I have to remind myself to step back and count to ten and remember that I am here to build the City. I am not here to get into pointless conflict. It's hard to do, but essential that I do it.
I want to ask you to count to ten. When you are angry at your government, remember that quick, anger-fuelled solutions usually make problems worse. When a neighbour expresses anger over a real or perceived failure of the government or public servants, speak up and remind them that so much of what holds our society together depends on those same public servants. They work to make sure that we have the comforts and community we all enjoy. When government does not solve the social problems that bring suffering to neighbourhoods, resolve not to grumble but instead to learn, participate, and organize for a better government.
Most of all spend some portion of every month – even just one hour – doing political work to ensure that we don't elect angry anti-democratic leadership to govern this wonderful City that is our home.
Gord
 
To be fair to Ronny Reagan, that line was prefaced with the phrase "In our current crisis..." Meaning that he did not intend it as a general commandment. I speak about this as a staunch liberal: Ron was not as adverse to government spending as the current Tea Party folks make him out to be.
 
Does anyone know anything about DECO? We keep hearing that it's a "Successful" business... How successful? Are we talking millions per year in profits? What's the market size for vinyl labels? Who are their competition?

I find it hard to believe that such a niche business can support 5 families (Randy's, Doug's, Kathy's, Rob's and Dianne) all living in rather nice houses, driving fancy cars, and with obvious problems with drugs that usually eat up the funds of other users.

For the record, while I believe that Rob has smoked crack (he's told us so), I doubt he's a regular user of crack... It makes more sense that he's got a powder cocaine problem and will occasionally smoke crack when that's not available.

It seems to me that these folks are living a pretty high life (no pun intended this time, ok maybe a little). Is it possible that they're in some business beyond labels that Rob's position as mayor is crucial to? They seem pretty desperate to keep him in the Mayors chair.

They must be successful enough to having paid for Rob Ford's office expenses as Councillor, maybe even some as Mayor. Wants the other Councillors to pay more of their office expenses from "their companies" as well. In fact, it seems to me, only multimillionaires should be in politics, as long as their expenses are paid by "their companies".
 
Last edited:
http://www.theglobeandmail.com/news...er-defining-day-adviser-says/article15346011/

It is not clear what kind of treatment Mr. Ford is contemplating, said Mr. Morris, who was at the mayor’s side for most of Thursday. However, the lawyer cast doubt on in-patient 21– or 28-day programs, saying they’re not a “magic pill”.

Oh God, is the next move "I'll do AA in the evenings and stay mayor"?

Perhaps someone can sell him some magic sobriety beans when his brother's not looking.
 
Interesting. To me, her demeanour was hard-as-nails, clawed-her-way-out-of-Nowheresville, therefore-insecure-about-her-status-must-keep-reasserting-it dragon lady.

Possibly. Her maiden name is Campbell though...not that it's necessarily indicative of a relationship, but I believe there's a very wealthy Campbell family here in Toronto. There's a couple health institutes named after them due to some pretty serious donations.

http://news.nationalpost.com/2011/1...n-to-toronto-mental-health-research-facility/
 
Last edited:
I think everyone that has been following this can see that things are not going to end well (at least not legally) for Rob, but what I am really curious about now is how all of this is going to impact Doug. I can't imagine that his aspiration for greater political power could ever come to pass now, though I've been surprised by that sort of thing before. What do you guys think will happen to him as this continues to play out? Will he eventually turn on Rob and have the family offer him up as a sacrifice as the really awful stuff surfaces? Will he do whatever he has to do to keep his brother in power as long as possible? Will he end up in legal trouble? More and more Doug becomes the interesting story for me.

Much as I hate to say it, I think Doug can hang and win the PC nomination in Etobicoke North and even win the seat, despite it now being generally accepted that he is a Rob's enabler. (Of course it's in our hands as citizens to thwart his ambitions.) As far as any higher aspirations, forget it -- establishment conservatism is still too strong a force in this province to permit rabble like him from becoming PC leader.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.

Back
Top