junctionist
Senior Member
There's so much space that you could probably add a right of way by narrowing the lanes and sidewalk. The pedestrian volumes aren't very high at this location.
There's so much space that you could probably add a right of way by narrowing the lanes and sidewalk. The pedestrian volumes aren't very high at this location.
Agreed. This design is unambitious and short sighted. How can we provide such feedback?
There's so much space that you could probably add a right of way by narrowing the lanes and sidewalk. The pedestrian volumes aren't very high at this location.
The underpass is already being built with an allowance for streetcar tracks. There's no need to build the right-of-way now as there's no plan to actually build a streetcar line under there. And frankly, there's nothing that says that it can't be added after.
Dan
Toronto, Ont.
You seem sure of this, yet it is not reflected in the documents. What needs to be made clear is if the City has protected enough space. If not, why would you go in twice if you don't have to, especially for a heavy railway underpass still currently used by freight trains?
I'm going to ask around on this.
Check the EA documents. They clearly stated (and demonstrated in the accompanying drawings) that the inner two lanes were being built with room to allow for streetcar tracks to be installed at some unknown future date. It's just like what was done with the Dufferin underpass.
Dan
Toronto, Ont.
Check TTC website the past few years and you will find info there stating the bridge was to be design for streetcars and was assure by the city that allowance was been made for it.You seem sure of this, yet it is not reflected in the documents. What needs to be made clear is if the City has protected enough space. If not, why would you go in twice if you don't have to, especially for a heavy railway underpass still currently used by freight trains?
I'm going to ask around on this.
The old EA documents, yes. Not the latest boards though.