terag51
New Member
The widening of Major Mac from the 427 Extension to Hwy 50 is now complete.
Last edited by a moderator:
Yes, but the lane coming off the highway onto major mac is only one lane... and then any traffic continuing onto coleraine is only one lane. This will be disastrous once things are open.The widening of Major Mac from the 427 Extension to Hwy 50 is now complete.
I believe the City is the one that will conduct the EA, not the MTO. No idea on timing.Anyone know what's happening with 401 and yonge for the on and off ramps?
This is the last info I could find. But does not say when the EA will start or the plans they are looking at.
Proposed new ramp for Hwy. 401 and Yonge Street clears first hurdle
The province has taken the first step in approving a plan to improve the Highway 401 and Yonge Street interchange in an effort to reduce congestion and support growth in the area.www.toronto.com
Do you have a link to that drone video?Anyone have an update on the 427 extension opening? They keep saying "2021" without any level of specificity.
Just watched their drone video of the extension. Looks pretty complete to me. Shocked about the ending at Major Mackenzie Drive though. Westbound towards Hwy 50 is a one lane ramp??? The truck traffic here will be insane and result in massive back ups
https://427expansion.ca/about-link-427/videos/Do you have a link to that drone video?
Much appreciated!
Bill Foster is right - we need a road solution in this area, but our way of thinking has changed since the old highway proposal. Maybe a 4-lane Donald Cousens-style parkway would work here as well.‘Zombie highway’: Residents and environmental groups ask for federal intervention on Bradford Bypass
The environmental assessment for the Bradford Bypass was completed in 2002www.simcoe.com
Personally I see the need for a freeway link here because a regular arterial would not serve the bypass‘ intended purpose, especially as it would not serve trucks as well. Regardless of what type of road is built in this corridor, it would still require the construction of bridges over the Holland rivers, as well as it would go through forestland regardless of road type. Yes, the ROW would be smaller, but I don’t think an arterial road with traffic lights would properly serve the needs of the area.Bill Foster is right - we need a road solution in this area, but our way of thinking has changed since the old highway proposal. Maybe a 4-lane Donald Cousens-style parkway would work here as well.
But I do respect the environmental concerns around the project, and I do believe that a thorough EA needs to be conducted.
Yes, in 2002. But national & provincial legislation has moved a long way since then, as well as widespread awareness of the impacts/implications of climate change. I think it's perfectly reasonable to have an EA on the project.An environmental assessment was already conducted. All these calls for new EA's are simply kneejerk reactions by opponents of this project. The conditions of the area haven't changed.