Midtown Urbanist
Superstar
Wong-Tam has been something short of bizarre this term of council.
Over the whole downtown core though?She has a point about the infrastructure not keeping up with the increased density
From the desk of NIMBY-in-chief, Kristyn Wong Tam: http://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2016/te/bgrd/backgroundfile-97790.pdf
There is a shortage of schools, water and sewage capacity(and maybe also Hydro) in the area south of Front Street east of Yonge so these problems are not restricted to the Yonge corridor. At the very least the City needs to put resources into properly understanding the constraints and then proposing plans to deal with them. A complete freeze may be overkill but SOMETHING does need to be doneOver the whole downtown core though?
If she was proposing this just along the Yonge corridor, it would make more sense.
There is a shortage of schools, water and sewage capacity(and maybe also Hydro) in the area south of Front Street east of Yonge so these problems are not restricted to the Yonge corridor. At the very least the City needs to put resources into properly understanding the constraints and then proposing plans to deal with them. A complete freeze may be overkill but SOMETHING does need to be done
As DSC said, it's not just the Yonge corridor. I don't agree with a complete freeze, but I have long wished that council would pay more attention to the infrastructure requirements before approving new development. Urban planning and all that.Over the whole downtown core though?
If she was proposing this just along the Yonge corridor, it would make more sense.
I disagree, this motion may be a way of alerting her colleagues to what REALLY is a big problem. It has certainly got US talking about problem that 'everyone knows about" but which nobody wants to discuss.Totally right that something needs to be done - what I'd like to see my councillor do, though, is tackle that problem head-on by doing her job; by rallying public support, by cajoling her colleagues, by working with city staff and the mayor, by actually attacking the problem, rather than by taking a silly, reckless, ignorant stand against economic development in the city and spreading mistruths to try to make foolhardy claims.
This, to me, is the definition of NIMBYism at its worst.
I disagree, this motion may be a way of alerting her colleagues to what REALLY is a big problem. It has certainly got US talking about problem that 'everyone knows about" but which nobody wants to discuss.
This is also how populist rhetoric starts. Even if this is a strategy to alert her council colleagues, what if some other politician or members of the electorate decide this was a serious proposal to push for? Serious of a proposal or not, because of Wong-Tam people are now going to be talking about the notion of a development freeze. She has a responsibility as an elected official to not instigate such things.I don't disagree with the premise that it's a strategy to alert her colleagues of the issues, but I'm pretty strongly of the opinion that it greatly undermines her own argument because of the absurdity of the proposal to address it and the false facts on which she's trying to base it.
This is also how populist rhetoric starts. Even if this is a strategy to alert her council colleagues, what if some other politician or members of the electorate decide this was a serious proposal to push for? Serious of a proposal or not, because of Wong-Tam people are now going to be talking about the notion of a development freeze. She has a responsibility as an elected official to not instigate such things.
Mind you, we have a development freeze for the longest time in an overwhelming proportion of land in Toronto - it's called the OP in the form of neighbourhoods.
AoD
Heh, and how much of that has contributed to our housing supply shortage and rising real estate prices?Mind you, we have a development freeze for the longest time in an overwhelming proportion of land in Toronto - it's called the OP in the form of neighbourhoods.
AoD