News   Dec 04, 2025
 651     0 
News   Dec 04, 2025
 1K     2 
News   Dec 04, 2025
 621     0 

RapidTO: Master Thread

Not trying to stir the pot, but that looks faster than an LRT. Just saying...

It’s totally doable in an LRV. I’ve been on the 509 where I’ve passed cars at that speed before. The Queensway section of the 501 too. It’s amazing when you have an operator who isn’t trained to be afraid of their own shadow.
 
Today at Queen and Bathurst:

1764307688333.jpeg

1764307711595.jpeg

1764307731314.jpeg
 
These cars must have migrated else where. Most likely blocking another lane of traffic else where.

While we don't yet have empirical data for this specific project set, your hypothesis is unlikely and inconsistent with past major street parking reductions.

In general, you get a modest decline in demand, most cars parked on main streets are not local residents, they are business owners and employees, and visitors to the area, some won't come to that area anymore, some will come by transit.

The remainder will continue to drive, but will park at the rear of their business in many cases and/or laneway parking, or paid off-street parking, or finally, on local side streets.

If you were parking on Bathurst between Harbord and Bloor, you can't just relocate to the next major N-S street over, that's ~1km away. Bloor is paid parking, and is not obstructing transit, perhaps you might find legal parking on Harbord, but it would it likely involve paying and/or greater distance or or both.

Apply that logic to virtually any paid space eliminated on Bathurst or Dufferin.

A 10-20% reduction in demand, the rest is shifted to side streets, or legal, off-street parking.
 
While we don't yet have empirical data for this specific project set, your hypothesis is unlikely and inconsistent with past major street parking reductions.
lol, why the harsh tone in your response? I was merely speculating, not making a statement. Heck, I was actually asking a question. I don't think I made a hypothesis at all.
A 10-20% reduction in demand, the rest is shifted to side streets, or legal, off-street parking.
Ah, the answer I was looking for. Thank you.
 
lol, why the harsh tone in your response?

There was no harshness. There wasn't a mean word said. Don't know what gave you that impression.

I was merely speculating, not making a statement. Heck, I was actually asking a question. I don't think I made a hypothesis at all.

This statement:

These cars must have migrated else where. Most likely blocking another lane of traffic else where.

Is a hypothesis. It posits an answer to your initial query. The cars/drivers (likely) did this. That's a statement.
 

Back
Top