News   Oct 02, 2024
 208     0 
News   Oct 02, 2024
 530     0 
News   Oct 01, 2024
 1.8K     3 

Provincial Budget

U

unimaginative2

Guest
Balanced budget tackles child poverty

Sorbara's budget speech
Budget highlights
Today's provincial budget contains no tax increases and projects a balanced budget for 2006-07, the second in a row, eliminating the $5.5 billion deficit inherited in 2003-04.
Here are the highlights:

· Minimum hourly wage increased to from $8 to $10.25 by 2010.

· New Ontario Child Benefit.

· Income splitting provisions for pensioners.

· 2 per cent increase in Ontario Works and Ontario Disability Support Program payments.

· New affordable housing programs

· Increased benefits for about 155,000 injured workers.

· Enhanced child care through an additional $25 million in 2007-08, growing to $50 million in ongoing support starting in 2008-09.

· Increasing Legal Aid funding by $51 million over three years.

· Hiring of 1,200 new elementary teachers in 2007-08.

· Hiring of 8,000 nurses by end of 2007-08.



Clawback of child tax benefit will end, minimum wage will rise
Mar 22, 2007 04:02 PM
Curtis Rush
thestar.com


Ontario Finance Minister Greg Sorbara presented a balanced budget this afternoon, heralding a “new era of economic strength for Ontario.â€

“Today we leave behind the deficits we inherited,†Sorbara said, adding that this budget sets the course for more prosperity and expanded “opportunity for Ontario’s most vulnerable citizens. This hasn’t been an easy journey.â€

The pre-election budget, delivered only months before voters go to the polls Oct. 10, was a broad-based fiscal package that included raises to the hourly minimum wages, funding for low-income families and seniors while providing new funding for schools and health care.

But it brought immediate criticism from opposition leaders who will be campaigning to discredit certain elements of the fiscal plan.

Progressive Conservative Leader John Tory and New Democratic Party Leader Howard Hampton questioned how anyone could believe the promises outlined in the budget.

“Why would anyone believe a word in this document?†Tory said, citing past broken promises. “This government has proven to be incapable of being truthful and straightforward.â€

Hampton criticized the budget as “being out of touch†with the citizens and said some promises in the budget, such as a new child benefit, won’t take full effect for five years.

Sorbara, however, told reporters, “I slept very well last night.â€

The budget also provides help for homeowners saddled with higher property taxes brought on by escalating property values, while also providing $37.9 billion in health spending, $781 million more to schools, and $5.9 billion to build new infrastructure in 2007-08, including a $1.7 billion investment to improve the provincial highway system.

With gridlock a major concern, especially in the Greater Toronto Area, Sorbara said new money will be allocated to new high occupancy vehicle lanes on sections of Highways 400 and 427.

This comes on top of $670 million in funding for Toronto and York Region for new subway construction to York University. Other transit investments include expansion of Brampton, Mississauga and York Region transit programs.

Sorbara told reporters that gridlock spending couldn’t be fixed “in one fell swoop,†and admitted “there’s much more to do.â€

Tory criticized the approach to addressing gridlock. “Where is the long-term transportation plan?†he said. “Their record is appalling in this area.â€

In the area of taxation, Sorbara is proposing several initiatives, including cuts to the business education property taxes to relieve the burden in mostly small businesses.

He is also proposing to end what he calls “unfair†taxation by phasing out GTA pooling over seven years beginning in 2007. This pooling transfers about $200 million in assistance from the 905 regions primarily to Toronto, placing a burden on municipal tax bases in contributing cities. The program will be fully eliminated by 2013 with the province uploading the costs currently funded under the program.

With a projected surplus of $310 million this fiscal year ending March 31 and with the government on track to post five consecutive surpluses, the finance minister presented a budget aimed especially at lower-income people by committing to raise the minimum hourly wage from $8 to $10.25 in three yearly increases of 75 cents.

“With the exception of the fall of 2006 – when North America experienced a cooler economic climate – Ontario’s economy has been growing at a healthy rate,†Sorbara said, adding that the Ontario economy has added 327,000 net new jobs since 2003 and expects another 270,000 new jobs over the next three years.

However, Hampton called the budget “a lot of hype and no action.â€

On the increase in the minimum wage, Hampton said that by the time the minimum wage is increased to $10.25 an hour, inflation will have eroded those increases.

“When you factor in inflation, they will still be living below the poverty line,†Hampton complained.

The budget contained another key measure to help those on social assistance.

In a bid to “lower the welfare wall,†Sorbara introduced the Ontario Child Benefit for children in lower-income families, providing support for every low-income family whether their parents are working or not and ending the clawback of the National Child Benefit Supplement by 2011.

“This is a miraculous transformation†for 1.3 million children and 600,000 welfare families, Sorbara said, adding that a person no longer will have to fear losing child benefits social assistance benefits by going to work.

The new child benefit would start in July, with a down payment of up to $250 per child, and by 2011, low-income families would receive up to $1,100 per child every year.

Payments would be reduced for net incomes above $20,000 per year.

“With these reforms we go well beyond ending the clawback of the National Child Benefit Supplement,†Sorbara said.

Low-income housing initiatives were also included in the budget.

Sorbara pledged that an additional $392 million to better housing for Ontario families will go in part to help 27,000 low-income families, who will receive $100 a month in housing supplements. In addition, the government will provide $127 million to municipalities to build new affordable homes and rehabilitate existing ones.

In recent months, the finance minister said he has heard from seniors worried about their economic future.

“Mr. Speaker, we heard a clear message from seniors over the past many months: ‘Help us to stay in our homes and give us greater access to our money’,†Sorbara said in his prepared speech.

He pledged to help by reforming the Ontario property assessment system to help seniors facing higher property taxes amid skyrocketing housing values, and to allow senior couples to reduce their income tax through new pension income-splitting rules proposed by the federal government.

“This would result in an Ontario tax savings of $170 million in this year alone,†Sorbara said.

On property assessments, in which a two-year cap is scheduled to come off this year, Sorbara is introducing changes to enhance the “fairness and predictability of assessments for property owners.â€

He intends to do this by proposing a four-year reassessment cycle.

This plan would begin in 2009 with the next reassessment. Any increase in value resulting from a reassessment would be phased in over four years.

“But reassessment decreases would apply immediately,†Sorbara said. “We are sure today that the reforms we propose will be welcomed by every homeowner in the province,†he said.

In health care, the finance minister has proposed adding pediatric surgeries to Ontario’s Wait Time Strategy, which is designed to reduce patient wait times in five areas, including cancer surgery, cardiac procedures, cataract surgery, hip and knee replacements and magnetic imaging and computed tomography scans.

“Wait times are shorter, but we want our health-care system to be at its very best,†Sorbara said.

He said he aims to deliver on this promise by hiring more nurses and training more doctors.

To boost education, Sorbara is increasing grants for student needs funding (for kindergarten to Grade 12) by $781 million for the 2007-08 school year to a total of $18.3 billion, up more than 17 per cent from 2003-04.

He also announced an additional $390 million for post-secondary education to help with infrastructure improvements and rising enrolments.

The budget also addressed the concerns over climate change.

Although steps have been made to make Ontario greener, such as protecting a greenbelt the size of Prince Edward Island, “there is much more to do,†the finance minister said.

Sorbara is proposing to deliver $2 million to the Trees Ontario Foundation – enough to plant over a million trees to help reduce greenhouse gases. He is also proposing $125 million in environmental research and will also provide homeowners with rebates of up to $150 to help pay for individual home energy audits.

The budget clearly didn’t go far enough for some critics, who wondered why there was not more spending on climate change and transportation to deal with gridlock.

“We’re disappointed in this budget,†Tory said, adding that this government is increasing spending by $22 billion since he came to office without significant results.

He also questioned Ontario’s economic performance.

“Our province is limping when it ld be running,†he said, citing over 120,000 manufacturing job losses over the past two years.

“Under Dalton McGuinty we are slipping,†he said, calling this budget spending an example of clear “vote-buying.â€
 
B-

Budget is good in terms of provincial services, and support for low income persons, but bad for Toronto.

I am very disappointed that there's no uploading, of even something as simple as the Ontario Drug and Disability Plans. Hazel McCallion and Roger Anderson et al get the phaseout of GTA pooling, but Toronto gets nothing out of that. Nothing new for Toronto infrastructure (all rehashed). The 400 and 427 HOV lanes are really road widening schemes.
 
The Province gave the city of Toronto a basket load of taxing powers with the potential to raise hundreds of millions of dollars annually for the city. Taxing powers that no other municipality in the province have.

It's all up to Toronto to use these new powers. However, I doubt Miller and City Council have the balls to implement even a fraction of the proposals in fear of voter back lash 4 years from now (they even got an extra year).

The Budget also committed the following dollars specifically to Toronto:

$5.5 million to Luminato - Toronto Festival of Arts and Creativity.

An additional $12.5 million to support the Toornto International Film Festival 2007.

Louroz
 
The Province gave the city of Toronto a basket load of taxing powers with the potential to raise hundreds of millions of dollars annually for the city. Taxing powers that no other municipality in the province have.

It's all up to Toronto to use these new powers. However, I doubt Miller and City Council have the balls to implement even a fraction of the proposals in fear of voter back lash 4 years from now (they even got an extra year).

Wow. Reminds me of letters to the Toronto Sun a bit.

But the 905 got help from pooling. Other than that $18 million you mention, Toronto got squat. I'm sure that if Toronto started using the taxes, there will be a backlash, but at least the city is looking into them. But if Toronto implements a tax that none of the 905 cities have, that could be very problematic, except Mississauga et al could end up taking advantage of that.

There is no excuse that with a surplus, the Ontario govenment didn't upload anything, except 905 pooling. Explain why Toronto should be paying for services the Ontario government is mandated to, but doesn't?
 
It seemed like the province was going to move on some of this before the budget (like drug and disability plans), but didn't.

Lack of city aid `disappointing'

Drug, disability plan alone costs Toronto $175M, Miller says
Mar 23, 2007 04:30 AM
Paul Moloney
city hall bureau

The provincial budget may be good for individual Torontonians, according to Mayor David Miller, but it's bad for the cash-strapped municipal government, which will have a tougher time balancing its operating budget this year.

"I think it's important to acknowledge that this budget was about people. There are many Torontonians who will benefit from the measures in the budget," Miller said at a city hall news conference. "Many of those measures are very consistent with city policies."

He praised cuts, for example, to the education taxes charged to businesses.

But from city hall's point of view, he said, "this budget's an extremely disappointing one."

One big hope was that Queen's Park would fund drug and disability programs that cost the city $175 million a year.

"It is a provincial program. It's a huge amount of money. We cannot afford it. We cannot afford, as the City of Toronto, to send a cheque for $175 million to the province every year. We can't. The money's just not there."

Miller said it's ironic that Queen's Park is flush with cash while it forces the city to struggle financially.

"It's time for the provincial government to stop running surpluses on the backs of property taxpayers in the city of Toronto. It isn't acceptable. It's enormously frustrating."

Toronto also wants Queen's Park to pay its full share of the city's cost of administering welfare benefits, running shelter beds and child-care spaces, and providing police security for the courts.

The city argues it's being shortchanged by $29.3 million this year on welfare administration, $29.1 million on shelters, $13 million on child care and $56 million on court security – a total of $127.4 million.

Pressed to specify how he will respond as a provincial election approaches, Miller said: "We're going to speak up very strongly about people's records and about their commitments. We'll examine every party. It's time for Torontonians and time for members of provincial parliament who represent Toronto to end this problem once and for all."
 
Pooling in the 905 isn't going to phased out until 2013.

Furthermore, the budget contained millions more for Toronto, including $26 million for new affrodable housing projects. Millions for new schools, employment programs and recreation projects. I'm could rant off each line item to you.

The point is, to say Toronto got nothing in the budget is an over reaction. Just because Miller launched a misguided "1 cent now of the GST campaign" at the Federal Government one week before the Budget, he can't expect all of his funding problems to disappear after one provincial budget. If anything he should have launched "1 cent of the PST now".

Louroz


Louroz
 
He was hoping for some uploading and the province assuming its actual cost share, and was pressing this issue for a long time (and certainly was not the only one pushing this). You have not addressed the points I am making. I did not mention a 1-cent tax or anything like that. The fact that Toronto got no bail-out this year, no uploading, nothing to support its operating budget (which has been affected more by downloading and provincial screws than anywhere else).

You certainly can not expect Toronto to suddenly use its tax powers, not without at least some study as to how they would raise revenue or affect individuals and businesses.

You seem to have a bit of a hate-on for Miller these days.

Budget is probably decent for the city. But not for the City - at least its budget. Simply put, Toronto got shafted again.
 
Toronto got shafted again.
When we voted for MDM. He is unable to deliver for Toronto and now will tax the shit of us for his pie in the sky dreams. He's become so irrelevent to senior levels of govt I fear for the city's financial well being. Looks like the feds and QP don't see the importance of the Toronto vote versus other areas in the province.

IMPEACH MILLER NOW!!!
 
Sorbara just gave Toronto the middle finger. How else to explain uploading social services for the 905 region but not for Toronto? And don't give me this nonsense that that was why Toronto was given additional taxing authority. Social services, which are dictated by the provincial government, should not be borne by property taxes. It's obvious that the provincial government is hoping that Miller will raise local taxes to meet the budget shortfall so that the provincial government can claim it has a balanced budget going into the elction and Miller takes the blame for higher taxes. Hard to believe but McGuinty is proving to be as inimical to Toronto interests as Mike Harris. What a great disappointment the Liberals have been.
 
This Editorial from today's East York-Riverdale Mirror sums it all up.


New taxes giving Toronto council wrong image
03/22/07 11:02:00
www.insidetoronto.com

Brace yourselves.
With Mayor David Miller assailing this week's federal budget for failing to provide adequate funding for cities, which effectively derails his splashy 'One Cent Now' campaign to get a portion of the federal GST, the motivation to fill the funding gaps using new taxation powers conferred under the City of Toronto Act could become too tempting to ignore.

And just about everything that can be legally taxed under the new act, which came into effect Jan. 1, is on the table for the city to consider. Torontonians may eventually begin paying a city tax on cigarettes or wine, movie tickets or vehicle registration. As recently as Wednesday, the Toronto Real Estate Board served notice that it is preparing to fight a possible Toronto land transfer tax for home buyers, an idea that is also floating around city hall.

But what this council continues to ignore - at its peril - is the perception created by this municipal administration.

We have councillors who are now enjoying a salary that was hiked by nine per cent and who are loathe to reopen the debate, for obvious reasons. We have a mayor spending millions on a renovation to his office area that some see as excessive. We have a growing city debt and deteriorating services.

On balance, none of this bodes well for the average property taxpayer in Toronto, who will almost certainly be paying a slew of Toronto-only taxes in the coming years if Miller continues to lead from the same playbook.

The fiscal conservatives on council have made occasional forays into suggesting credible alternatives, but lack the focus and collective voice needed to get Toronto's left-leaning administration to take heed.

And Miller, given his new powers, doesn't appear to be listening either.

This council hasn't done much to counter the perception that it is perfectly willing to use its new powers through additional taxation on an already over-burdened property taxpayer, to fix the problems it has helped create - even sustain - through its lack of fiscal control and management.

Torontonians don't want to see the millions upon millions of dollars they send to city hall through their property taxes spent on splashy campaigns that are ineffective. They're surely tiring of the 3-C approach Miller has taken on more than one occasion when seeking funding from other levels of government over his two terms of office: Criticize, complain and cash in.

The City of Toronto Act does set the stage for more mature and responsive government. So far, it appears, it's being viewed at city hall as a licence to take more out of our pockets.
 
Oh yes, the venerable East York Mirror. Wow am I impressed. I was going to go to the trouble of replying in detail to that piece of trash but it doesn't deserve my time.
 
Parts of budget will help Torontonians

JOHN BARBER

Given that yesterday's provincial budget ignored city demands for the province to take back responsibility for offloaded social programs, Toronto Mayor David Miller's reaction to it -- "absolutely unacceptable" -- was predictable. But before venting his spleen, he acknowledged that the budget will help many Torontonians.

How could a New Democratic mayor of a city with a disproportionate number of Ontario's needy complain about welfare reforms? In fact he didn't, calling the budget's social spending "terrific."

And while it doesn't do anything for the city treasury, the promise to reduce commercial and industrial property-tax rates will make its biggest impact locally, with Toronto businesses gaining more than $200-million of the scheduled tax cut.

Although the cuts are phased over an excessive seven years -- a decade ago, former finance minister Ernie Eves promised (but failed) to do the same job in five years -- the new budget includes a provision for all new construction to be taxed at the target rate of 1.6 per cent.

So the days of high local tax rates driving business to the suburbs are coming to an end. That is terrific news for city businesses and residents alike, as Mayor Miller, describing the rate cut as "part of my strategy," acknowledged.

Heck, so is the Finance Minister's decision to speed up the elimination of his capital tax, another old Tory policy he has embraced -- this being the second time he has vowed in a budget speech to kill off the "job killer" tax. Let's face it: What's good for Bay Street is good for Toronto.

As usual, however, the Torontonians who stand to benefit most from this budget are the same ones who scored biggest in Monday's federal budget -- the millions who live outside city limits in the 905 suburbs.

Unique among Ontario communities, these largely wealthy municipalities will receive a major fiscal boost from the province's decision to drain the pool that currently requires them to support social programs in the city.

Tellingly, the decision to eliminate pooling was the only real "upload" in the entire budget. "They acknowledged the importance of uploading," Mayor Miller commented, "but uploaded certain costs of social services for all of the areas around Toronto, not Toronto."

As for the city's insistent demands for similar relief, they were ignored. Because the city still pays for so many provincial programs, according to the mayor, its treasury will be forced to pay extra for the budget promise to raise welfare rates marginally.

"They have a surplus . . . yet this government won't even pay its bills," he complained. "I mean, come on."

Non-partisan taxpayers may well ask the same question when they examine Greg Sorbara's fishy new plan for "fixing" the residential property-tax system.

Once again, Mr. Sorbara has fallen back on old Tory strategies, trying to mitigate the inherent volatility of current-value assessment by phasing in reassessments over several years.

For Ontarians who fear losing their homes because of annual reassessments, Progressive Conservative Leader John Tory commented, the new system means "you've now got four years to pack up and leave your house."

Deviously, the Liberals are scheduling reassessments to fall at the exact midpoint of the fixed electoral term -- the obvious reason being to give the inevitable anger time to cool before the next scheduled election, two years later.

It's clever, but (to borrow a phrase from the mayor) completely unacceptable.

Mr. Tory knows that, having recently promised a hard cap that would immediately eliminate, not mitigate, assessment volatility. He has also promised to straighten municipal-provincial fiscal tangles "immediately," complete with uploads and long-term cost-sharing agreements.

With respect to Toronto, the differences between the two leaders are becoming increasingly clear. While swinging left provincially, the McGuinty government has only made next October's choice more difficult for liberal Torontonians.

jbarber@globeandmail.com
 
Perhaps the editor at East York Mirror should ask just how much of an impact these issues of "perceptions" (their language, not mine) have on the overall budget of 7B?

As to the issue of "overburdened"...compared to what? Shall I use the example of the paragons of sound fiscal management in the 905 as to how much residential taxes homeowners there are paying? (and none of those municipalities had to deal with aging infrastructure, or social demographic like Toronto).

AoD
 

Back
Top