nfitz
Superstar
Any advantage that Chinese grammar (or lack of it) might have is negated by it's relatively inaccessible written form, compared to other simpler systems such as the Greek alphabet (which lead to most European alphabets) or Hangul (Korean alphabet).Since when being flexible is a good thing for scientific language? Chinese, which doesn't even have a grammar in the real sense, is probably 10 times more flexible than English and it didn't become the language of science.