Admiral Beez
Superstar
There’s always the unicorns as well. My lawyer’s daughter got a MA in Art History in London, UK and now has a super career at Sotheby’s auctions.
There’s always the unicorns as well. My lawyer’s daughter got a MA in Art History in London, UK and now has a super career at Sotheby’s auctions.
That's probably more a function of your daughter and her drive. Running degree mills won't make more people like this.There’s always the unicorns as well. My lawyer’s daughter got a MA in Art History in London, UK and now has a super career at Sotheby’s auctions.
Your post reminded me of my mid 20s. After my BA I went to George Brown for international business. And that’s where I noticed the difference in the women. In those pre-Lulu days, at university women’s fashion on campus was all sweat pants and ponytails. But then at GB with its fashion, hairdressing and cosmetics programs I was in awe.Here's an exact example of the mismanagement in our system. Algonquin College cutting a hairstyling and esthetics program because it's not a moneymaker that caters to foreign students. And it's a program that has a waitlist. I'd rather fund this than more BAs.
Bouzi: It makes no sense to shut Algonquin College's Hairstyling and Esthetics programs
This skilled-trades instruction has a waitlist, and it employs and trains women. It fits the mandate of a community college exactly.ottawacitizen.com
This is one field that is probably pretty resistant to automation and offshoring!Here's an exact example of the mismanagement in our system. Algonquin College cutting a hairstyling and esthetics program because it's not a moneymaker that caters to foreign students. And it's a program that has a waitlist. I'd rather fund this than more BAs.
Bouzi: It makes no sense to shut Algonquin College's Hairstyling and Esthetics programs
This skilled-trades instruction has a waitlist, and it employs and trains women. It fits the mandate of a community college exactly.ottawacitizen.com
Haha, I'm not opposed to the sweatpants and ponytail aesthetic. Anyone can be made fairly attractive with enough fashion, styling and makeup.Your post reminded me of my mid 20s. After my BA I went to George Brown for international business. And that’s where I noticed the difference in the women. In those pre-Lulu days, at university women’s fashion on campus was all sweat pants and ponytails. But then at GB with its fashion, hairdressing and cosmetics programs I was a transformed.
Joe Taxpayer votes for the dismantling of the healthcare system. So nothing really needs to be done here to correct it I guess.When Joe Taxpayer is paying for something they get a say through their elected representatives. That's how our democracy works.
A lot of 'BS' jobs/degrees will be blown away by waves of AI replacing white collar work. I honestly worry about entry-level technical work. It is easy to imagine AI advancing to the point that most of that low-level technical work can be automated and reviewed by more experienced/senior staff. I just wonder how we will possibly train the next generation of experience/senior staff. It takes years of accumulated experience to develop that judgement, and I already find the 'apprenticeship' period pretty long for entry level workers to develop to the point where they are strong contributors.
99% of the current AI boom is nonsense, since the LLM path is pretty much done, and it will revert to normalcy after the hype dies down. It will implode around the time that investors find another shiny thing to look at. Proper use of AI actually increases the amount of human hours worked, so companies will run away from it screaming.
99% of the current AI boom is nonsense, since the LLM path is pretty much done, and it will revert to normalcy after the hype dies down. It will implode around the time that investors find another shiny thing to look at. Proper use of AI actually increases the amount of human hours worked, so companies will run away from it screaming.
The only reason you need a lawyer is because I have a lawyer. It’s a virus.The current AI hype is overdone. That doesn't mean the idea has no legs or won't have an impact. It may not reduce jobs right away. But the increasing productivity could drive down employment growth initially. If every lawyer in a firm is 10% more productive, you could use 10% fewer lawyers for the same workload.
And translators too, already beat down by Google Translate will be made irrelevant by AI.Content generation is an example of BS jobs that are being automated away. Think copywriting... lots of Amazon listings found with ChatGPT errors...