News   Dec 20, 2024
UrbanToronto Year-End Poll: Vote on the Best Buildings of 2024, presented by Sapphire Balconies
 3.2K     11 
News   Dec 20, 2024
UrbanToronto's Social Media Presence Skyrocketed in 2024
 1.1K     3 
News   Dec 20, 2024
Mattamy Homes Records A Year of Accomplishments
 2K     0 

Planned Sprawl in the GTA

Of interest currently in the Narwhal ( either paywalled or currently as a promotion piece)is an article titled (in part) "York Regions sewage could hurt Great Lakes and U.S. relations". The article discusses the plans of the Ford Government for vastly increased movements of wastewater to Lake Ontario, much of it being sourced from the Lake Huron watershed (tens of millions of liters per day) , due to the proposed developments, much of it on Greenbelt lands) in York Region. The article further discusses the potential environmental impacts, and the potential issues with international agreements with the USA.

Well worth reading and I am sure there are others with knowledge who could add to the discussion.

There is a related article re potential federal involvement in greenbelt issues And if you are further interested, there are a number of other articles from back issues on related subject within the GTA.
 

How '15-minute cities' turned into an international conspiracy theory​


From link.

Duncan Enright never imagined he'd get death threats over a plan to reduce grinding city traffic.

But it is exactly what happened to the local politician in the U.K., who found himself deluged with abusive messages on social media and by email over his involvement in a proposed traffic filtering trial run in the city of Oxford.

The plan, designed to reduce the use of snarled-up city roads during peak traffic times, would require residents to get permits to drive through the filters, enforced by cameras, on six key roads.

The accusations flung at Enright were wild and varied, and mostly from people with no connection to Oxford, he said. Many were from outside the U.K.
Click to expand...
They claimed he wanted to confine people to their neighbourhoods and accused him of being part of a malign international plot to control people's movement in the name of climate action.

"It was quite alarming," Enright told CNN, "I haven't really had anything like that before in my many years in local government."

Enright had been swept into a conspiracy theory, fast gaining pace around the world, which has rebranded plans to cut traffic, reduce air pollution and increase walking and cycling in cities as "climate lockdowns."

Oxford has become a flashpoint, in part, because its traffic filtering plan has been conflated with a separate proposal in the city to create "15-minute cities," the main focus of the conspiracy theorists' ire.
Click to expand...

WHAT ARE 15-MINUTE CITIES?​

Type "15-minute cities" into social media and be prepared for a barrage of claims the idea will usher in dystopia, people will be fined for leaving their "district" or it is "urban incarceration."


The concept, however, is pretty simple: Everything you need should be within a roughly 15-minute walk or cycle from your home, from health care and education to grocery stores and green spaces.

The aim is to make cities more livable and connected, with less private car use -- meaning cleaner air, greener streets and lower levels of planet-heating pollution. Around a fifth of the world's human-caused, planet-warming pollution comes from transportation, and passenger cars make up more than 40 per cent of this.

Carlos Moreno, a professor at the Sorbonne University in France, is credited with first coining the term 15-minute cities, but the broad concept is not new.


"This idea takes inspiration from many urbanists, starting from Jane Jacobs, who in the last decades have been advocating for compact, lively, and therefore more walkable urban environments," Alessia Calafiore, Lecturer in Urban Data Science and Sustainability at the University of Edinburgh.

It has gained traction internationally. In Paris, Mayor Anne Hidalgo based her 2020 reelection campaign, in part, on a plan to create 15-minute cities. The city has banned cars from parts of the Seine, added hundreds of miles of cycling routes and created mini parks.

Ottawa has proposed 15-minute neighbourhoods, Melbourne in Australia plans to adopt 20-minute neighborhoods and Barcelona, in Spain, has been implementing a car-free "superblocks" strategy.

Even some U.S. cities have taken up the idea. Portland introduced 20-minute neighbourhoods more than a decade ago, while O'Fallon, Illinois, recently published a strategy to "grow from a typical suburban community to a community with everything you need within 15-minutes."

Pandemic lockdowns helped boost the popularity of the concept, as people, confined to their neighbourhoods, were forced to reevaluate their local area.

"We have become more aware of how important living in well-served areas is," Calafiore said.

Yet now, the mere mention of 15-minute cities online will bring a slew of angry commentators.

"That planning has become the conspiracy theory of 2023, who'd have thought?" asked Alex Nurse, a lecturer in Geography and Planning at the University of Liverpool, who was deluged with messages after his recent article about 15-minute cities in the Conversation.

"My inbox died," he told CNN.
Click to expand...

BIRTH OF A CONSPIRACY THEORY​

So, how did this fairly mundane strategy become a flashpoint for a spiraling climate-related conspiracy theory?

For years, certain actors within the fossil fuel industry have been trying to whip up anger about climate action by rebranding it as "climate tyranny," said Jennie King, head of Climate Research and Policy at the Institute for Strategic Dialogue, a think tank focused on disinformation and extremism.

Pre-2020, however, they struggled to get traction, she told CNN.

That changed with the pandemic.

A series of media articles arguing we should rebuild a post-COVID-19 world that could maintain the drops in planet-warming pollution were seized upon to turbocharge a narrative claiming governments wanted to limit freedoms in the name of climate action.

The World Economic Forum's "Great Reset" initiative, billed as an effort to tackle inequality and climate crisis post-pandemic, fanned the flames.

The term "climate lockdown" started swirling around, pushed by right-wing think tanks and climate-skeptic media figures. From there it filtered down to more extreme conspiracy communities, King said, including QAnon-affiliated groups and anti-vaccine groups.

Fox News took it up, along with high-profile climate deniers.

Ordinary people were swept along, too. The pandemic left millions with genuine trauma and real concerns about government overreach, King said. "And that has been weaponized by a vast ecosystem of bad actors."
Click to expand...

DISINFORMATION IS OPPORTUNISTIC​

The idea of 15-minute cities fits neatly into the "climate lockdown" conspiracy theory, partly because it is easy to spin that way.

"The conspiracy theorists are right that you can't make a real city out of self-contained enclaves -- those would just be villages," Carlo Ratti, an architect, engineer, and Professor at the Massachusetts Institute of Technology, where he directs the MIT Senseable City Lab, told CNN.

But it misinterprets the idea, he said. It "gives people the freedom to live locally, but does not force them to do so."

Yet "disinformation is opportunistic," especially when it comes to climate, King said. Anything can become a lightning rod for manufactured controversy and when an issue starts to receive attention, a host of different actors "flood into the space," she added.

In December, Canadian clinical psychologist and climate skeptic Jordan Peterson posted a tweet attacking 15-minute cities: "The idea that neighbourhoods should be walkable is lovely. The idea that idiot tyrannical bureaucrats can decide by fiat where you're 'allowed' to drive is perhaps the worst imaginable perversion of that idea."

In early February, U.K. politician Nick Fletcher raised the conspiracy in Parliament, calling 15-minute cities an "international socialist concept" and claimed they "will cost us our personal freedom."

And last weekend, online theories spilled into real life protests, as thousands of people, many from outside the area, took to the streets of Oxford to protest the traffic filtering and 15-minute city proposals.

There are, of course, plenty of criticisms of 15-minute cities, including their potential to fracture cities, furthering existing inequalities between richer and poorer areas.

And Enright, in Oxfordshire, acknowledged local people have legitimate concerns about the traffic filtering plan. They will continue to consult, he said.

But this successful spinning of a huge conspiracy theory, by miscasting the intentions of 15-minute cities, has worrying long term implications for climate action, King said.

Governments, both local and national, may find it very hard to implement any policies that even touch on the climate crisis, she warned. "They are the most vulnerable at the moment to this enormous surge of hostility and public mobilization."
Click to expand...
 
It's because the prog left blew their credibility on every issue imaginable. So the more angry and less informed opponents on the other side have lots of fodder for criticism; granted, plenty of it ill informed.
 
MisterF said:
So the right invents an insane new conspiracy theory but somehow it's the left's fault. Right.
Click to expand...
It’s a conspiracy surrounding a left-leaning idea, as is somewhat common. The left does have issues w/credibility, communication, and alienating certain bases. Likewise for planning as a discipline. This makes it pretty easy to misconstrue a vague concept like a “15-minute city” especially when it pops up in WEF documents, giving the right a field day.

My two cents: An interesting angle I heard on Twitter is that this “conspiracy” also more fundamentally appeals to right-wing opposition to central planning. It appeals to everyone’s ‘fundamental NIMBYism’ by advocating for both physical and lifestyle changes to their communities- we see this in regards to development all the time, and now there’s a catch-all phrase. people don’t realize this is a continuation of planning as it has always been.

When things about 15-min cities started rumbling, I expected an urbanist counter from the right, but was fairly disappointed to see the current narrative be fully embraced by even more conscious folks like Jordan Peterson. Being an academic living in Seaton Village, the hypocrisy and ignorance is sad. Especially when our conservative premier is actively advancing measures to create these types of communities.
 
So, for lack of a better spot, I want to drop something here.

I was saying in another thread today that there is simply no way the development industry can possibly meet current and growing demand in the near term.

Put simply, you could reduce development charges to zero, introduce as-of-right 50 storeys everywhere and nothing more would get built than is getting built today, due to labour shortages and material and equipment supply challenges.

So I wanted to be sure I wasn't talking completely out of school, so to speak.

So I messaged someone in the industry who is a major supplier of key equipment and personnel and asked that very question. If developers (clients) approached you tomorrow w/double the demand for equipment/people could you fulfill that in the near term?

This is the answer I got:

"As it stands we can barely find new apprentices. There are not enough to fill current demand. In the next ten years there will be a wave of retirements. It will devastate the workforce. Forget what you are talking about. We used to battle other companies with having different types of equipment.. It is turning into who has labour. Not uncommon for staff to be offered extras like free 407 transponders or even a free place to stay near the job site. To fix this problem will take 10 - 20 years. Sad. Considering it is not unheard of where first year apprentices make a lot of money"

* note in the above quote that the italics represent where I have modified specific statements to the general.

I did this after asking permission to quote said person; and they agreed provided I removed anything that would clearly identify them, or their business.
 
Isn't at least part of the problem the construction unions artificially restricting hiring to force up wages?
 
Undead said:
Isn't at least part of the problem the construction unions artificially restricting hiring to force up wages?
Click to expand...

So, I might have thought I knew the answer to this, but really wasn't sure; and I asked the same source...........and I'll paraphrase the answer........


Forget union restrictions, we're hiring, we have enough journeymen to train; we can't find enough people willing to learn. Period.

Sure there are some rules that may be could use some tweaking; but they aren't an issue currently; there is an absolute personnel shortage and apprentice shortage.
Click to expand...
 
Northern Light said:
So, for lack of a better spot, I want to drop something here.

I was saying in another thread today that there is simply no way the development industry can possibly meet current and growing demand in the near term.

Put simply, you could reduce development charges to zero, introduce as-of-right 50 storeys everywhere and nothing more would get built than is getting built today, due to labour shortages and material and equipment supply challenges.

So I wanted to be sure I wasn't talking completely out of school, so to speak.

So I messaged someone in the industry who is a major supplier of key equipment and personnel and asked that very question. If developers (clients) approached you tomorrow w/double the demand for equipment/people could you fulfill that in the near term?

This is the answer I got:

"As it stands we can barely find new apprentices. There are not enough to fill current demand. In the next ten years there will be a wave of retirements. It will devastate the workforce. Forget what you are talking about. We used to battle other companies with having different types of equipment.. It is turning into who has labour. Not uncommon for staff to be offered extras like free 407 transponders or even a free place to stay near the job site. To fix this problem will take 10 - 20 years. Sad. Considering it is not unheard of where first year apprentices make a lot of money"

* note in the above quote that the italics represent where I have modified specific statements to the general.

I did this after asking permission to quote said person; and they agreed provided I removed anything that would clearly identify them, or their business.
Click to expand...
Would enabling low rise intensification help?
 
You must log in or register to post here.

Back
Top