dowlingm
Senior Member
you’re basically telling the story of UPX here. They left the money on the table initially, and then they dropped their prices in a panic because the papers were printing bad news stories about ridership, but didn’t yield manage the PM peak when you have the evening commuters and passengers heading for 8pm+ red eyes.The northbound ride is the bigger concern. Commuter passengers (who then leave a seat unoccupied for the rest of the trip) should not be allowed to squeeze out longer distance passengers who offer greater revenue. Some method of holding the commuters until all longer distance passengers are seated is desirable.
A big consideration is whether this option attracts a handful of riders (who are easily accommodated without crowding the train), versus a larger contingent who overwhelm the capacity of the (hopefully popular) long distance ride. I won't speculate what the numbers might amount to. The problem for ON is that once the option is made available, if it's too popular, it will be very hard to withdraw or scale back. I can understand why they might avoid it from the start, even if it leaves revenue on the table.
Amtrak has a similar situation with their long distance routes south of NY, where they started selling tickets northbound from Washington but keep a tighter grip on inventory heading south lest they be accused of blocking seats towards the South




