jaycola
Active Member
That is literally impossible if you're placing a casino smack downtown, which everyone can access easily. The only way it can be achieved is by placing a ban on people with financial issues or gambling problems, like they have in Singapore, or banning locals altogether, like they have in Monaco.
And yet, the much respected Toronto Medical Officer Health recommended a number measures to mitigate exactly that issue. Maybe we should toss his entire report if this section on minimizing risk to problem gamblers is meaningless.
I could suggest that a casino in this location could have a major economic impact while we could be talking about the same numbers.TOperson said:To know that and say "allow the casino anyway" is to prioritize the entertainment options of some people and the minor economic benefit to the public purse over the suffering of those affected by problem gambling.
KPMG estimated the economic benefit to the Australian Economy of the Melbourne Casino was $2.1 Billion and indirectly supported 23,000 jobs. Numbers like that are not in my opinion a minor economic benefit.
In 2011 the Toronto area saw 9.8 million over night visitors. Overseas visitors increased by 6% in 2011, making it the fastest growing market segment. China (+25%), Australia (+20%), India (+19%), and Brazil (+10%) were the fastest growing individual markets. While we take appropriate measures to safeguard those at risk gamblers, we should be taking advantage of Toronto's growing reputation as a tourist destination.
We are not closing the casinos that exist in Ontario and for those problem gamblers, distance is a minor inconvenience, nothing more. Taking adequate measures to protect them may be better in the long run than simply making access a time issue.