Only the Scarborough RT has the same „quality“ as the REM - which is being an incompatible proprietary technology impeding the development of an integrated network.
You can't compare the REM to the Scarborough RT and you know it.
And complaining about incompatible technologies is rich when we compare this to Toronto. Heavy rail subway lines with a strange gauge only found here, streetcars with that same gauge, a funky
first-generation light metro, a couple of light rail lines using standard gauge and overhead line, and now a new light metro, the Ontario Line. Wow, very standard! So Montreal will just have two diffrent things? Sounds nice...
And what part of it is "proprietary"? The REM uses standard gauge, standard 1,500 V DC catenary, and Alstom Metropolis trains which are currently in service with 50 operators all over the world. I can't tell you how many systems around the world use diffrent modes within the same system. Including Toronto, London, Paris, and so on... That does not make it "proprietary". Incompatible yes, but not proprietary.
„Building light metros“ for the sake of building light metros. The REM will be remembered as a cautionary tale of what happens when you define a solution before the problem…
I'm sorry but I just disagree with you on that. It is replacing a very popular commuter rail line and also serving the airport, with more frequent trains. I really don't see how it could be a "cautionary tale".
.