Aaron
Active Member
I wonder how many of us had a BeavisButthead reaction to that wall ad for rubbers...no, not those kinds of "rubbers"...
*Raises hand*
I wonder how many of us had a BeavisButthead reaction to that wall ad for rubbers...no, not those kinds of "rubbers"...
hey UT world,
short time lurker, first time poster...
i have thoroughly enjoyed the now/then thread so i figured i would take advantage of the awesome weather yesterday to take some photo's of my own. i apologize for the tree in my way at king and river but it was best spot i could get to...
i'll do my best to get out and take some more pics and will post them as i do.
later!
September 22 addition.
Looking SE across the city from Berti and Adelaide. I lost my notes for the 'then' picture. thecharioteer originally posted it - it was taken from the rooftop of a building no longer extant at the SW corner of Berti and Queen.
If anyone knows the name of the building, or if thecharioteer comes along, please let us know.
By the by, that is a 'shot tower', in the middle right of the picture. Molten lead would be dropped from a height, as it formed a ball and cooled you could have shotgun pellets. Also, the 'chilled shot' signage was a giveaway.
Students: what other manufactured goods are being made in our Young Toronto? Engineering students: what has wire got anything to do with nails?
Now: August 2009. 'Now' picture taken about 40 feet from the location of the original photographer, from the 5th floor of the Green P parking garage.
Engineering students: what has wire got anything to do with nails?
Great series. That last pair - photogs like you and tomms - I don't know how you manage to persuade people to let you into buildings or onto rooftops to take pictures.
that one was no big deal... there's an open fire escape down the side of the building that i happily climbed, i would have gone higher but the tree kept getting bigger!
QUOTE]
And there - next to the St. Lawrence Hall - is the Beard Building ( 1894 ), built at 7 storeys rather than the 9 originally designed, of load-bearing masonry rather than the metal frame construction planned.
A time of dramatic changes to the skyline, introducing a new breed of hefty commercial office buildings: Confederation Life ( 1892, 7 storeys, load bearing masonry with some structural metal ); the Board of Trade ( 1892, 7 storeys, steel frame ); Simpson's Department Store ( 1895, 6 storeys, steel frame ); the Temple Building ( 1896, 10 storeys, cast iron frame ). The TD Centre/Commerce Court/FCP of their day.
"I'm not a Montreal expert, but it seems to me in my all too brief visits there that that city's central business district has escaped what happened here in the 60s and 70s."
Yes and no. On the one hand, development pressures in Montreal were not as intense and didn't last as long as in Toronto--our equivalent of Old Montreal, which I guess would be the area of Toronto St/King/Victoria etc. was definitely ransacked by comparison. On the other hand, Montreal still lost a staggering amount. My parents--Montreal expats both--have a book called 'Lost Montreal' which documents in excruciating detail all of the historic buildings that went for modern towers, parking lots, and especially highways. The result is a downtown that I find pretty uninspiring. Much like Toronto, the city is special because of its mixed-use neighbourhoods, not its centre.