steveintoronto
Superstar
There's a distinct risk in doing this, however, and it's my experience that if you are within your two or three hour window (TTC, GO) inspectors don't look or seem to care the route you've taken. It's only whether the window is open or closed. So if you're approaching the end of the window, tapping can only cause you grief, not relief. I've learned not to transfer when approaching the end of the open window, as if you miss your connection, you're paying again next time you tap-on, whereas if you stay on the vehicle you're on, but the window is already closed, you can ride it to the end.It simplifies explaining to fare inspectors. They move on quicker in ambigious situations.
There are very few situations requiring more than 1h59min between first and last tap, so if you know you are well within that, then tapping again in farepaid areas will reduce discomfort during your next inspection in any ambigious situation.
They cam see where you last tapped, and when, the reader says that.
You *don't* have to, but it doesn't hurt.
Because 30min from a "last tap" (completed transfer tap) is better than 2.5 hours from a "first tap" (skipped transfer taps of a long bus/streetcar-subway-bus/streetcar) reduces odds of explaining to fare inspectors -- say, an inexperienced one having a bad day.
The former is nobrainer zero-coffee clearcut, and the latter is ambigious
This situation occurs when, for example, you're headed west on College to Roncesvalles to transfer onto the 504 to Dundas West. You're approaching the end of your time allotment, so if you transfer to a northbound route, say Spadina, Bathurst or Ossington, once on the NB vehicle, even if the window closes, you're already able to transfer to the subway while your fare is still paid. Transfer at Ronces, and you might end-up walking if you don't want to pay. (It's a short walk, so not such a great inconvenience, but it makes the point that 'renewing' your tap-ons offers no advantage. It invites disadvantage.
Last edited: