At the least they need to include a train and bus symbol.
In all seriousness they need to do something.At the least they need to include a train and bus symbol.
If you squint hard enough. It's just another secret ministry office.
Thats money well wasted, congrats on finding a way to make your signage much worse than it was before Metrolinx!
I tried to be reasonable, I tried to say "Maybe this won't be that bad" and I used to defend this wayfinding and called it good, but no I hate this, I really really hate this.
Funnily enough, Metrolinx settled on the T roundel only after almost selecting a double chevron symbol, which, well, looks a lot like SEPTA's traditional and recently revamped transit symbol:People compare the T to Boston, and while the final T looks somewhat different from Boston, your average person isn't going to be able to tell the difference, and the T just looks like 90% of other transit agencies within the US.
Would've been more eye-catching and less boring too.Funnily enough, Metrolinx settled on the T roundel only after almost selecting a double chevron symbol, which, well, looks a lot like SEPTA's traditional and recently revamped transit symbol:
View attachment 355652
From KerrSmith Design
View attachment 355651
From SEPTA
Context?(Shaking Head)
... because the traditional "Sideways T" was just so hard to spot or comprehend.....
- Paul
So in other words, they paid consultants hundreds of thousands (potentially millions), only to come up with generic designs that are already used and exist in North America?Funnily enough, Metrolinx settled on the T roundel only after almost selecting a double chevron symbol, which, well, looks a lot like SEPTA's traditional and recently revamped transit symbol:
View attachment 355652
From KerrSmith Design
View attachment 355651
From SEPTA