News   Feb 18, 2026
 334     0 
News   Feb 18, 2026
 406     1 
News   Feb 18, 2026
 424     0 

Mayor Olivia Chow's Toronto

Ok.....where to start?

I think I'll try to take this clumps and update through the evening.

Lets Start with Parks (ie. not community centres, the ferry terminal etc.)

General:

Parks Washrooms

3 additional washrooms to be year-round this year, 156 total, the target is 162 for 2026 or +6 from year end 2025.

****

Specific projects of interest to UT'ers:

For @DSCToronto

David Crombie Park:

Read first year as 2025 (from left)

View attachment 625480

**

Market Lane Park - Remediation is budgeted for this year.

Construction, this year and next:

View attachment 625481

**

I don't know who wants to claim the Corktown Off-Leash area............but I have to see the render for this baby:

View attachment 625482

Seriously? Base is mulch, a fence, 2 benches, and a doggy drinking fountain. I can get that done for under 200k no problem.......... So how did we get to a nearly 1.8M budget here? I mean...lighting ok.....maybe add 200k.....

Now what? Is there a Doggy waterpark? A mister? A playground? A fitness set? LOL

**

Mouth of the Creek Park is substantially deferred.........again....:

View attachment 625483

***

We have a park for @AHK

View attachment 625484

And

View attachment 625485

***

This is @interchange42 's neck of the woods:

View attachment 625486

^^^ 2027/2028

Grand Avenue Park Expansion also has money, drips and drabs flowing over the next several years:

View attachment 625489

View attachment 625490

I love how there are funds for phases 1 and 3 but not 2.....

***

There is some money for fixing College Park, but not til 2026:

View attachment 625487

****

Lots more, but I'll leave it there for now and come back w/Community Centre Info, and operating budget later.
Market Lane Park has a schedule of:

  • Winter 2025: Hire a construction team
  • Spring/Summer 2025: Construction starts
  • Spring 2026: Construction complete, park reopens
David Crombie Park has a schedule of:

  • Early 2025: Hire a construction team
  • Spring 2025: Construction for park and cycle track starts
  • Late 2025: Construction for cycle track complete
  • Spring 2026 to Fall 2027: Construction for park improvements continues
  • Fall 2027: Construction for park improvements complete
In neither case has a construction firm been selected, but (if I remember right) both have been advertised.
 
Less?

- A drastic increase in Library hours with every branch to be open Sunday.

- A modest expansion of Community Centre hours.

- The largest TTC Service increase in years.

- More police

- Expanded outdoor swim season

- Expanded outdoor pool hours (2 additional hours daily in July/August)

****

I' ve been critical of some of the budget choices in here, the Mayor and her team don't get a free pass........... but the idea that we're getting nothing is wholly unreasonable.



Durham Region is 7.5% this year. It was 7.4% last year, for a cumulative total of ~15%

Mississauga is 8.8% this year, it was 4.9% last year for nearly 14%.

I think its important to realize this is not the Mayor delivering increases that are outlandishly high relative to peer Cities/Regions.

Additionally, the City's rate after this increase will be broadly in line with or slightly below the area average.
Thanks for digging into the numbers from the suburbs.
This is why I think its just a hate on toronto thing
 
She is writing her own re-election slogan: "Olivia Chow - Doing less with more..." I am frustrated as I don't realistically feel like the city will run better at the end of next year than it did now. Its an almost 7% increase on top of a 9.5% increase last year - that compounds to a 17% increase in two years.
Taxes were kept low for 14 years so there will be some sticker shock initially to catch up and balance things.
This is a much better option than continuing the slow decay of the city that has been going on for the last decade and a half.
 
This is a VERY interesting development! SEE: https://www.thestar.com/news/gta/a-...cle_8300406c-d284-11ef-adb3-67ce836460bc.html

In a tight vote that split the board down the middle, city councillor Shelley Carroll has been elected chair of the Toronto police board — a powerful position that involves approving the cop budget and hiring the police chief.
”I really think that I can offer the board a bold step forward,” Carroll said at a Tuesday morning meeting inside Toronto police headquarters, after being nominated for the role by fellow councillor Lily Cheng.
“I think right now we are at a critical point.”
Carroll, a longtime city councillor who has also served as chair of the city’s budget committee, won the position 4-3, unseating Ann Morgan, a former Crown prosecutor who had held the chair position for the last two years.

Morgan’s vice-chair, Kostakis, was also unseated Tuesday and replaced by Brillinger in a vote that replicated the split between city and provincial appointees.
 
Is it positive for a Toronto city councillor, which is already a full-time job, to take on another $90K/year job? How many hours does the Chair of the Police Services Board require to fulfil it diligently? If it can be easily accommodated within a city councillor's free time, why does it pay like a full-time job?

LOL. If the TPA didn't like a former Crown Prosecutor at the head of the Board, they're going to love Sherry Carroll!

 
Is it positive for a Toronto city councillor, which is already a full-time job, to take on another $90K/year job? How many hours does the Chair of the Police Services Board require to fulfil it diligently? If it can be easily accommodated within a city councillor's free time, why does it pay like a full-time job?

LOL. If the TPA didn't like a former Crown Prosecutor at the head of the Board, they're going to love Sherry Carroll!

Fuck the TPA. I literally could not care less what their opinion is on anything after their anti-Trudeau rant. Defund Toronto Police while we're at it since they're useless anyway. Peel Police want a 23% budget increase...for what? Ugh. Awful police organizations.
 
A report on Stormwater/flooding mitigation to next week's Executive Committee kills the proposed Stormwater/'rain' tax.


From the above:

1737472349890.png


For the record, this is the correct move, subject to proceeding with the Commerical Parking Levy (as they overlap, and the CPL is far easier and less costly to implement) However, the City is stalling on that one too.... see next post.
 
Here's the Report on the Commercial Parking Levy.......which in my judgement wrongly seeks to forestall the idea, while playing footsie with MPAC.

They make the basic idea seem much more challenging than it is.

In reality - No assessment value is necessary if the fee is per space, per day. If you target only larger lots, which is the efficient way to do this, you can easily pick them out on google maps, a list of Green P assets and with a handful of other tools.

No need to bother with 10 space strip malls, the target is Yorkdale, STC, Big Box Power Centres etc etc.


In the report, staff wrongly suggest they need to capture underground lots. They certainly could and that would generate revenue, but they can choose to exempt them on the grounds that they don't have they same adverse impact to landuse or stormwater. The key is simply to set criteria which can be read as objective and fair.

Equally, they are lowballing the annual revenue estimate severely.

There are 1,000,000 commercial parking spaces in Toronto, for argument's sake, by exempting smaller lots we slash that to a mere 200,000, and assess them at $3 per space, per day, we arrive at annual revenue of 219M

This is more than double what the City now estimating.

To be blunt, the tax is being sabotaged.
 
Here's the Report on the Commercial Parking Levy.......which in my judgement wrongly seeks to forestall the idea, while playing footsie with MPAC.

They make the basic idea seem much more challenging than it is.

In reality - No assessment value is necessary if the fee is per space, per day. If you target only larger lots, which is the efficient way to do this, you can easily pick them out on google maps, a list of Green P assets and with a handful of other tools.

No need to bother with 10 space strip malls, the target is Yorkdale, STC, Big Box Power Centres etc etc.


In the report, staff wrongly suggest they need to capture underground lots. They certainly could and that would generate revenue, but they can choose to exempt them on the grounds that they don't have they same adverse impact to landuse or stormwater. The key is simply to set criteria which can be read as objective and fair.

Equally, they are lowballing the annual revenue estimate severely.

There are 1,000,000 commercial parking spaces in Toronto, for argument's sake, by exempting smaller lots we slash that to a mere 200,000, and assess them at $3 per space, per day, we arrive at annual revenue of 219M

This is more than double what the City now estimating.

To be blunt, the tax is being sabotaged.
Indeed, they are probably right that using MPAC data is essential and I suspect this will be seen as another front in the 'war on the car' and thus not supported by MPAC or the Fordites. If we need to rely on MPAC then it is deader than the dodo.

"While staff will continue to discuss the implementation of a commercial parking levy with MPAC, ultimately, they hope to also secure access to greater revenue tools that reflect Toronto’s contributions to the economy. Should MPAC and the Province support the implementation of a CPL staff are committed to ensuring a final implementation plan is presented to City Council for their consideration, which would detail how to implement it in a fair, clear and consistent manner across the commercial property class, in consideration of the meaningful feedback collected as part of the stakeholder engagement conducted in 2024."
 
Here's the Report on the Commercial Parking Levy.......which in my judgement wrongly seeks to forestall the idea, while playing footsie with MPAC.

They make the basic idea seem much more challenging than it is.

In reality - No assessment value is necessary if the fee is per space, per day. If you target only larger lots, which is the efficient way to do this, you can easily pick them out on google maps, a list of Green P assets and with a handful of other tools.

No need to bother with 10 space strip malls, the target is Yorkdale, STC, Big Box Power Centres etc etc.


In the report, staff wrongly suggest they need to capture underground lots. They certainly could and that would generate revenue, but they can choose to exempt them on the grounds that they don't have they same adverse impact to landuse or stormwater. The key is simply to set criteria which can be read as objective and fair.

Equally, they are lowballing the annual revenue estimate severely.

There are 1,000,000 commercial parking spaces in Toronto, for argument's sake, by exempting smaller lots we slash that to a mere 200,000, and assess them at $3 per space, per day, we arrive at annual revenue of 219M

This is more than double what the City now estimating.

To be blunt, the tax is being sabotaged.
This is where Chow needs to step up and put a stop to such nonsense...
 
oops!

City’s largest workers union votes in favour of strike mandate​

On Tuesday, CUPE 79, the union that represents 30,000 city workers, said more than 90 per cent of its members voted in favour of a strike.

 
oops!

City’s largest workers union votes in favour of strike mandate​

On Tuesday, CUPE 79, the union that represents 30,000 city workers, said more than 90 per cent of its members voted in favour of a strike.


CUPE scuppering an NDP mayor again at this point in history would be an “interesting” look!
 
Olivia for the longest while has been going off her association with Jack and name recognition. She is an old school NDP stalwart that in my opinion does not remain in touch with the current reality of things.

Please present actual policies you disagree with and evidence as to why they are somehow dated or out of touch.

I don't agree with your take here at all.

Her current policies are from the pre-2012 era of the NDP where grassroots socialism ruled the day. What she does not realize is that people don't want higher taxes because the cost of living in Toronto is already high.

Again, I disagree and would like to see your evidence.

I think that Unions are waking up to the NDP and realizing that they no longer support them. They are supporting other parties which will enhance their members quality of life overall, not just say they will fight for them if and when they can get into a position of power.

I have been a member of the NDP since I was 18 (2006) and more recently I have noticed that the party has lost its way. They have not been the party of hope and optimism since Jack was alive and quite honestly, I would have been proud to call Jack Layton the PM.

Unfortunately, when Andrea Horwath and Tom Mulcair became leader everything changed. They went from a party who fought for Canadians to the party who kept attacking everyone else.

It has got to the point where I am actually planning to vote liberal in the next elections.

Really, Richard your anti-NDP animus which you've shown and written about multiple times over the years is a bit over-the-top. We all get it, you hate the NDP pathologically. That's fine.......I suppose. But its really hard to take, because you seem to let it permeate and colour your view of everything.
 
Last edited:
I think most people who would consider voting for the NDP in Toronto recognize that Toronto's property taxes are lower than other municipalities in Ontario, whether you measure either my the rate or the absolute amount paid. Obviously nobody loves paying more taxes, but I don't think most people in that group object to Chow's tax increases as long as they see city services improving from where they were a few years ago.
 

Back
Top