King Street (Streetcar Transit Priority)

[W. K. Lis]

The Uber and Lyft drivers have chat groups now on apps like Slack where they share info about things like if and where police are monitoring the King Pilot zone. They all know when they are not there and can totally ignore the rules.

Cameras needed, if it wasn't for the automobile disciple politicians who will delay and defer as much as possible.

 

[robmausser]

The Uber and Lyft drivers have chat groups now on apps like Slack where they share info about things like if and where police are monitoring the King Pilot zone. They all know when they are not there and can totally ignore the rules.

King street needs cameras like red light cameras now that its out of pilot.

Go straight through, get your license plate pic taken, $100 fine in the mail.

Im against speed cameras as they are generally just a revenue generator, but this is different, this is illegally driving through an intersection into an area thats banned.

And the funds should go towards that 60 streetcar order

 

[nfitz]

King street needs cameras like red light cameras now that its out of pilot.

It's not out of pilot. Council extended the pilot. A report is expected sometime this year.

 

[thettctransitfanatic]

The Uber and Lyft drivers have chat groups now on apps like Slack where they share info about things like if and where police are monitoring the King Pilot zone. They all know when they are not there and can totally ignore the rules.

You know, those Uber and Lyft drivers don't give a damn about us transit users and pedestrians. They only care, obviously about the money

 

[Rainforest]

King street needs cameras like red light cameras now that its out of pilot.

Go straight through, get your license plate pic taken, $100 fine in the mail.

Im against speed cameras as they are generally just a revenue generator, but this is different, this is illegally driving through an intersection into an area thats banned.

And the funds should go towards that 60 streetcar order

It will take something like 40,000 non-compliant drivers to buy one additional Flexity

 

[DSC]

King street needs cameras like red light cameras now that its out of pilot.

Go straight through, get your license plate pic taken, $100 fine in the mail.

Im against speed cameras as they are generally just a revenue generator, but this is different, this is illegally driving through an intersection into an area thats banned.

And the funds should go towards that 60 streetcar order

Not sure why speeding is different from going wrong way or running a red light - all are dangerous and illegal and I agree both should be monitored by cameras.

 

[thettctransitfanatic]

It will take something like 40,000 non-compliant drivers to buy one additional Flexity

Hmm, sounds about right. But then BBD would take 2 yrs just to ship it...

 

[W. K. Lis]

Talking about parking for automobiles....

Smart city planners are rethinking parking by getting rid of it

From link.

Joni Mitchell sang, “They paved paradise and put up a parking lot.” But could parking lots soon become extinct, with the lost paradise making a return?

As cities get smarter and mobility solutions and consumer habits change, more urban planners are eschewing the construction of public parking garages — or changing how they conceive of them altogether.

With ride-sharing services gaining ground, a shifting demographic of people who no longer own cars, and the coming revolution of autonomous vehicles, transportation planners and city managers are rethinking parking despite the fact that more people are expected to move from rural to urban centers in the coming years.

According to a survey by commercial real estate firm CBRE, U.S. & Canadian Mobility 2018, the concept of commuting by car is about to undergo a paradigm shift. Indeed, in the U.S. people under 30 are more than seven-times more likely to take public transportation than those over 60 years of age. Furthermore, over the past three decades, the percentage of younger people who apply for a driver’s license has dropped nearly 20 percent, according to the University of Michigan’s Transportation Institute.

“The demographics are changing, with younger people not owning as many cars,” Brian Abbanat told Digital Trends. Abbanat is a senior transportation planner for the city of Davis in California, which is considered one of the most progressive cities in the U.S. when it comes to transportation; it was one of the first municipalities to create dedicated bicycle lanes back in 1967.

Still, it’s a challenge to predict what a city’s parking needs may be decades into the future.

“And technologies come and go. Fuel cells were going to be big, then there was the Segway, now it’s the e-bike sharing systems,” Abbanat said. So in the short term, Davis is looking to charge for street parking downtown, hoping to manage supply and demand. Abbanat said the city is looking at dynamic pricing (higher prices during peak hours) and pay-by-app solutions to mitigate “ticket anxiety.”

As for the long term, Davis is not planning on building any parking garages. Outside consultants agree that the coming trends argue against it, with the mayor of Davis, Brett Lee, recently pointing out that a municipal garage would cost roughly $15 million and the city would have to increase property taxes for five years to cover the cost.

Moreover, there are many benefits that result from choosing not to build parking lots.

Un-paving paradise

“It’s not just about the car industry,” Esther Bahne, head of strategy and innovation at Mini, told Digital Trends. “It’s about the whole environment. Getting rid of parking lots, for example, can free up streets, allow for more parks and less pollution.” Bahne, who has worked in the auto industry for over 14 years, said the coming changes of electrification, ride sharing, and autonomous vehicles require creative ideas in cities in order to plan for the future.

In fact, even where people are still building parking lots, they are taking a whole new approach that the Abbanat calls “adaptive reuse” of parking facilities.

In Columbus, Ohio, which won the U.S. Department of Transportation’s $40 million Smart City Challenge two years ago, the local government has been studying and running various pilot projects to deliver solutions to city problems. Andrew Ginther, the mayor of Columbus, told Digital Trends that one of the major issues facing towns is affordable housing, especially as more people are predicted to move to cities.

“So now we ask, how can we build a parking garage so that it can be repurposed and reused in the future?” Ginther told Digital Trends when we asked him about the city’s smart city progress.

Even in places that are under constant expansion and lean heavily on a car culture, like Las Vegas, people are rethinking the approach to parking.

Making them different

“We are now building parking garages with the ramps on the outside of the main structure, in anticipation of a future where we won’t need as much parking and can then re-purpose the garages as residential properties, just by tearing off the outer ramps,” Michael Lee Sherwood, the director of technology and information for Las Vegas, told us at the Smart Mobility conference in Tel Aviv last fall.

Such considerations also affect the design and construction of office and apartment buildings.

A Hudson Pacific Properties office complex going up on Sunset Boulevard in Los Angeles, for example, will have a dedicated ride-share drop-off lobby and two floors of parking that can be converted into office space in the future. The location is expected to house Netflix’s new headquarters, but even in the car-centric West Coast metropolis, planners are considering changes in the transportation landscape.

Such design changes mean building garages with higher ceilings and eliminating the sloping floors of typical indoor garages. A 15-foot floor-to-floor plan, for example, is usually needed for a loft, shopping, or apartment space. And if garages are to be converted to habitable office or apartment space, there also has to be accommodation for additional plumbing and electrical work, something that’s usually not considered in the construction of poured concrete multi-level parking facilities.

Furthermore, commercial property owners look 30 years out and have to anticipate revenue streams decades into the future. If people aren’t driving to work on their own or primarily using shared autonomous vehicles, they may not need parking, in which case a garage wouldn’t be profitable. So being able to easily convert such spaces into office, retail, or rental properties is a critical consideration today.

“But it’s hard to foresee the changes that are going to happen,” Abbanat of the city of Davis said. Even though the city has had bike lanes for over 40 years, for example, it’s now wrestling with how to handle e-bikes and scooter sharing services because the city has an ordinance that bikes need to locked at a bike rack. However, there aren’t many bike racks around town now; should they install more? What about on suburban streets? What about charging stations?

Now imagine the legislative headaches when people start riding in shared autonomous electric vehicles everywhere.

 

[pstogios]

Does anyone know if the city of the TPS give two s**ts about enforcing the rules of the Pilot? Walking on King today was an embrassament, dozens and dozens of cars passed through prohibited intersections without a care in the world. It is really disgusting.
I am inclined to make complaints but I have little to zero confidence the city or the TPS will care.

 

[TheKingEast]

Does anyone know if the city of the TPS give two s**ts about enforcing the rules of the Pilot? Walking on King today was an embrassament, dozens and dozens of cars passed through prohibited intersections without a care in the world. It is really disgusting.
I am inclined to make complaints but I have little to zero confidence the city or the TPS will care.

I use it every day. Thee are days where it's nothing but cars causing traffic. If the rules are not going to be enforced, this pilot is a waste of time.

 

[DSC]

I use it every day. Thee are days where it's nothing but cars causing traffic. If the rules are not going to be enforced, this pilot is a waste of time.

Hyperbole may be fun but ….. Yes, there are cars driving straight through on King BUT most do not and transit works MUCH better (which was and is the point of this project). Could signage be better? Could enforcement be improved? Could the general streetscape look better? Yes, Yes and Yes, but to say the project is a 'waste of time" is simply silly.

 

[TheKingEast]

Hyperbole may be fun but ….. Yes, there are cars driving straight through on King BUT most do not and transit works MUCH better (which was and is the point of this project). Could signage be better? Could enforcement be improved? Could the general streetscape look better? Yes, Yes and Yes, but to say the project is a 'waste of time" is simply silly.

If they are going to have cars blocking traffic and creating traffic, then the pilot is a waste. My commute time still hasn't changed. Streetcars still jammed and typically there are days where the streetcars are not moving because there's way too much traffic on King. It's not difficult to enforce. So instead of making excuses for half assed attempts, lets demand better.

 

[thettctransitfanatic]

If they are going to have cars blocking traffic and creating traffic, then the pilot is a waste. My commute time still hasn't changed. Streetcars still jammed and typically there are days where the streetcars are not moving because there's way too much traffic on King. It's not difficult to enforce. So instead of making excuses for half assed attempts, lets demand better.

Exactly. What's the point of an project prioritizing transit if we are gonna alow your typical automobile driver and automobile god to compete against a Flexity. It's 20,000 vs 84,000 and what wins. The 84,000

 

[DSC]

If they are going to have cars blocking traffic and creating traffic, then the pilot is a waste. My commute time still hasn't changed. Streetcars still jammed and typically there are days where the streetcars are not moving because there's way too much traffic on King. It's not difficult to enforce. So instead of making excuses for half assed attempts, lets demand better.

I do not think anyone says there could not (should not) be more enforcement but from my experience transit on King is MUCH more reliable and if streetcars get stuck on King it is much more often because cross-streets are blocked (another enforcement issue!). We should demand better enforcement but if you expect to NEVER see cars on King you will be out of luck. As with fare inspections, you cannot and need not inspect everyone - you just need to have enough enforcement so that people think they MAY be inspected and change their behaviour.

 

[nfitz]

If they are going to have cars blocking traffic and creating traffic, then the pilot is a waste. My commute time still hasn't changed. Streetcars still jammed and typically there are days where the streetcars are not moving because there's way too much traffic on King. It's not difficult to enforce. So instead of making excuses for half assed attempts, lets demand better.

I'm surprised, because I've found riding that section, particularly at peak, is much faster - it's just as fast now to ride to St. Andrew instead of getting off at King, if heading up Line 1 to St. George - and that was never the case before!

My regular commute on King hasn't changed much though, because it's all east of Jarvis, and seldom was particularly congested anyway - though even around Sherbourne there seems to be less traffic on King - it's notably easier to walk across the street!

Where is your commute? What time of day?