1)Every ten years they're allowed to raised fares to reflect rate of inflation. In 2010, set the base rate for a metropass at $150. Eliminate cash fares (tokens only) and also get a weekly pass for $50.
Hong Kong has developed a formula which takes inflation into account to determine fare changes...
Overall fare increase/decrease = 0.5x consumer price index change + 0.5x wage index change - 0.5x production factor (set at 0.1%)
The fare change cannot be greater than 5% or less than 1.5%. With this formula, there is a possibility of a fare cut if there is deflation. Unfortunately, if the statistician makes a mistake, the mistake is reflected in the fare (this has happened!).
http://zh.wikipedia.org/zh-hk/可加可減機制 (Chinese)
2)Wal-Mart Stations. Yes, allow companies naming rights to future subway/LRT stations in exchange for building these shops beside or above the stations, with less parking... What matters is more stations for more people, not debates over public vs private concerns.
I would only agree with this if the station actually makes sense. "Walmart Station" wouldn't work as the name "Walmart" makes no sense geographically, as would any name of a chain store.
What might work is if a condo/mall/office developer buys up naming rights to a station next door and applies the name of the project to the station, as long as that name is unique and works for the community. It could also apply to existing landmarks; for example, TTC could threaten to change the name to Yorkdale Station if Yorkdale Mall doesn't pay up.
Potentially, TTC could sell naming rights to direction signage in stations, or to automated announcements on buses. For a fee, a building could get TTC to add its name to a directional sign in a subway station that leads passengers to that building, or to have the name of that building announced on the bus that passes in front of the building.
The Dubai Metro claims to be the first metro system in the world to apply corporate branding to its stations, but in Dubai you don't see stations named after McDonald's or Walmart. They are usually named after nearby developments.
4)Any developers that wanna build dense housing on TTC land given the rubber stamp to do so. Only design review panel is a must here.
That might guarantee the TTC riders, but not more profits. The TTC should partner with the developer in developing the project, and get some of the profits from selling the units. If it is a mixed use development (retail in the podium), the TTC should get a cut of the rent too. That's how the MTR subway operator in Hong Kong gets rich.