That's a good point.
Another question for this: Did TTC Park n Ride usage drop after they made the switch from free to paid? From what I gather, the lots are still pretty full.
|
|
|
GO Transit: Service thread (including extensions)
- Thread starter drum118
- Start date
That's a good point.
Another question for this: Did TTC Park n Ride usage drop after they made the switch from free to paid? From what I gather, the lots are still pretty full.
lenaitch
Senior Member
Possibly, but an entirely different topic than the provincial government trying to run local municipal transit. That's what I meant by "corporations".
Fritter
Active Member
From what I've personally experienced in the last few schedule changes, is there may be a change in the works and all the ducks are put in a row for it, but in the last month or less before the change something will happen to prevent it.
To give Metrolinx a tiny bit of credit, I think this is partially why the are so secretive about upcoming changes until they publicly publish the changes .
smallspy
Senior Member
What has happened is that Metrolinx has been.....well.....overly optimistic with their requests for service changes and track slots. To the point of internally circulating potential schedules, train cycling and platform allocations for them prior to having everything finalized. (They do then send out the finalized ones in advance of the announcements, of course.) And the freight railroads have walked them back from it, telling them that they can only reasonably accomplish a portion of what they would like to achieve. And to Metrolinx's credit, in some cases the schedule changes that they've gotten have looked really substantial on the timetables (15 minute service on Lakeshore East, for instance) but have had a very, very minimal effect on the freight railroads dispatching and track allocation requirements.
But they are very, very protective of this, and have a requirement to not have the changes leaked prior to their own announcements. Which is why they no longer send the various transit agencies in the GTA the advance copies of the finalized schedules - they found that they would sometimes leak them.
Dan
robmausser
Senior Member
Usage is less important than the percentage using the parking lot for the TTC/GO in my opinion. Proper usage would be the metric I'd call it.
robmausser
Senior Member
I want Kitchener Line weekend service but we know that ain't happening until after the 401 tunnel is done.
Krypto98
Active Member
Any updates on the Guelph speed restriction? I haven't taken the train all the way to kitchener in a while so i haven't gotten any updates there
The Bramalea-Malton Speed Restriction looks to have been reduced from 30 MPH to about 45/50 MPH. I don't know what the original pre-speed-restriction limit was. This upgrade saves about 1-2 minutes from the scheduled 7 minutes on the timetable.
There is still a speed restriction of 60mph at highway 401/409 tunnel. And at Mount Dennis of 60 mph
The platforms Bramalea look nearly complete structurally but i haven't seen much progress. I'm hoping they are done by april so we can get some kind of service increase.
Also a note: the Counter-peak- Kitchener 2:47-4:51 train does not stop at Etobicoke North. They might be able to implement some kind of 30 minute service by skiping Etobicoke North or add the missing 5:51 arrival in union by skipping Etobicoke North. They might even be able to some add early counterpeak morning trains from the two existing deadheads by skipping etobicoke north.
The Bramalea-Malton Speed Restriction looks to have been reduced from 30 MPH to about 45/50 MPH. I don't know what the original pre-speed-restriction limit was. This upgrade saves about 1-2 minutes from the scheduled 7 minutes on the timetable.
There is still a speed restriction of 60mph at highway 401/409 tunnel. And at Mount Dennis of 60 mph
The platforms Bramalea look nearly complete structurally but i haven't seen much progress. I'm hoping they are done by april so we can get some kind of service increase.
Also a note: the Counter-peak- Kitchener 2:47-4:51 train does not stop at Etobicoke North. They might be able to implement some kind of 30 minute service by skiping Etobicoke North or add the missing 5:51 arrival in union by skipping Etobicoke North. They might even be able to some add early counterpeak morning trains from the two existing deadheads by skipping etobicoke north.
crs1026
Superstar
Some of that leakage can be criticised as people not playing as a team, but some of it is inevitable. If you are a transit agency managing connections to GO, you need to reissue your own schedules when GO makes changes. That may mean posting the changes internally so operators can bid on the work. There are contractual notice periods before a “change of card”, so the agency may well be disseminating the facts ahead of the event. And transit will have to have its own proactive public communication so riders know why the bus timings have changed.
ML’s perverse insistence on secrecy is all about politicos wanting to hold photo ops and not be upstaged by (entirely appropriate and timely) communications to customers. Transit people have told me that Ml has asked for those in the ‘need to know’ to sign non disclosure contracts around service change previews. I’m told that some agencies, quite understandably insulted, have told ML where to stuff their nondisclosure paperwork.
But no, transit is not politicised in the GTA.
- Paul
ShonTron
Moderator
Member Bio
- Joined
- Apr 24, 2007
- Messages
- 13,282
- Reaction score
- 12,050
- Location
- Ward 13 - Toronto Centre
Etobicoke North is the only station east of Georgetown where only one platform can be used, which might explain the non-stop there. It's a very bare station by modern GO standards - a pre-fab mini-station, a simple asphalt platform and mini-platform, parking lot, and a single bus loop (which is now unused).
I'm curious what kind of work will be required for the new Woodbine station, if any tracks there will have be moved for platforms. There will be a slow order there as work is done.
smallspy
Senior Member
Work is starting on that project this spring.
The zone speed for that section of line is 80mph. They are likely waiting for enough tonnage to pass over it before further reducing or removing the slow orders.
Construction for both. Likely to remain like that for some time, until all of the work at the respective locations is done.
Dan
Krypto98
Active Member
What does it mean by enough tonnage to pass over it?
crs1026
Superstar
When they lay or alter railroad tracks, the trackbed and ballast have to be compacted before it is fully stable. The weight of the first so many trains will provide the necessary compacting pressure. Basically, trains use the track at low speed until a certain accumulated amount of train weight has passed over the location. Then they may go back and measure and do more surfacing to correct any unevenness in the settling of the roadbed. Only when that has been done is the track considered stable and full speed limit is allowed.
- Paul
TransitBart
Senior Member
In the case of these GO lines where there are 6 and 10 trains per direction in a day, so like a dozen to 20 trains - how many months might that take? It's a bazillion tonnes for sure.
denfromoakvillemilton
Senior Member
Member Bio
- Joined
- Apr 30, 2008
- Messages
- 7,646
- Reaction score
- 1,729
- Location
- Downtown Toronto, Ontario
Understanble, but still a bad idea. The schedule would help agencies like DRT and Oakville plan local service better, reducing the need for driving to the station.
tmlittle
Active Member
I agree with your assessment, but I wonder, are there any real infrastructure/logistics reasons for this? Weekend service obviously would be much lower than weekday service -- so would this be because of higher freight traffic on weekends or them taking advantage of downtime to move ahead faster on construction?