evandyk
Senior Member
Liberty village is a suburb shoehorned between a rail line and a highway.TBF my friends downtown ESPICALLY those in liberty village complain about congestion and traffic. Worst of both worlds imo!
Liberty village is a suburb shoehorned between a rail line and a highway.TBF my friends downtown ESPICALLY those in liberty village complain about congestion and traffic. Worst of both worlds imo!
I was responding to a comment that suggested spending billions on Go is not a good election move for Conservatives. I think it is because in the suburban ridings around Toronto, people know that good transit to Toronto will reduce traffic and make their lives better, which it will.I think we can accept that the roads are really quite full in this city. Doesn't mean we endorse DoFo's solutions or want to enlarge the road network.
But it's a definite change from even a decade ago, and the trend is noted by anyone who has been trying to get around. For many, it does take some getting used to, and plenty of people are still making the adjustment..
- Paul
How much of suburb traffic is downtowners driving there, and how much the reverse.TBF my friends downtown ESPICALLY those in liberty village complain about congestion and traffic. Worst of both worlds imo!
It depends on what you consider the suburbs? Are we talking about Oakville or Scarborough?How much of suburb traffic is downtowners driving there, and how much the reverse.
I understand what you’re saying BUT the fact is the government let people build their houses there so at some point they have to provide the transit. And Toronto is guilty of this too. Toronto had great planning and then we got north of St Claire or Eglinton area and we went from semis to SFH. Hard to serve by transit. Is it easier to serve than the 905 sure but they shouldn’t have been built either.How much of suburb traffic is downtowners driving there, and how much the reverse.
I don't get why there isn't a rule or tax incentive for WFH, but even the federal government claim to be champions of pro environmental policies are forcing people back in.I understand what you’re saying BUT the fact is the government let people build their houses there so at some point they have to provide the transit. And Toronto is guilty of this too. Toronto had great planning and then we got north of St Claire or Eglinton area and we went from semis to SFH. Hard to serve by transit. Is it easier to serve than the 905 sure but they shouldn’t have been built either.
Toronto can’t also be begging people to come back in the office to help their downtown businesses yet at the same time not be offering those people ways to get there.
Agreed but then you have another problem that a whole bunch of people work from home and somehow downtown can’t financially survive off the people living there.I don't get why there isn't a rule or tax incentive for WFH, but even the federal government claim to be champions of pro environmental policies are forcing people back in.
Not even 5 days a week, mandating 1 day a week would really help people who work for smaller companies that forced everyone back in the officeAgreed but then you have another problem that a whole bunch of people work from home and somehow downtown can’t financially survive off the people living there.
The big banks who just built those billion dollar office buildings with the idea of renting out their old offices have a lot of real estate investments. They want them to mean something.
But it’s weird. WFH theoretically saves a fortune on transit and is good for the environment. You would think that’s the clear winner but it’s not.
The big banks who just built those billion dollar office buildings with the idea of renting out their old offices have a lot of real estate investments. They want them to mean something.
Liberty Village continues to be a pretty big transportation failure. It's built at a density that does not support people getting around by driving, but the transit provided doesn't actually enable people to get around the city reasonably efficiently. You have a slow King streetcar to Line 1, a frequent but packed Dufferin bus to Line 2, or an infrequent Ossington bus. For thousands of people, most of whom just moved here from the suburbs or a small town and are used to getting around by car. So they get in their car and sit in endless traffic on East Liberty.
Just like what will happen in the lower Don lands.
And let's add another 700+ units, with three parking spots for residents. At least they won't be sitting in traffic on Liberty St., but they'll be walking/cycling to most places faster than the TTC will get them there. And the city will have to go to Doug Ford for permission to add any bike lanes.
![]()
55-Storey Proposal Could Be Liberty Village's Tallest Yet | UrbanToronto
Liberty Village could see a dramatic shift in scale with a 55-storey mixed-use tower proposed at 147 Liberty Street. Designed by Sweeny &Co Architects Inc. for Intentional Capital, it would be the tallest in the immediate area, located within walking distance of the future Exhibition station on...urbantoronto.ca
I thought the Ontario government recently cancelled King-Liberty station.By the time this building opens, LV should have access to the Ontario Line, expanded GO service at Exhibition Station as well King-Liberty station.
They haven't canceled it. They've been talking about prioritizing 3 of the 5 stations because costs have gone up, but no final decisions have been made yet. At worst, the station will be delayed. Of course, I could just be naiveI thought the Ontario government recently cancelled King-Liberty station.
Isn't that the case with every election because 90% of the population lives in suburbs?This election will be won or lost in the GTA suburbs. People who are constantly stuck in traffic.




