ehlow
Senior Member
Sometimes low end of LRT is the appropriate thing to build
the easy answer that everyone wants to hear: TUNNEL
or elevated....but seriously, these people need to accept the reality that they cant get everything they want. If theyre so against it they can simply move out to beside the subways
I think that having proper priority traffic lights for the LRT is what people deems as acceptable. Can't blame people to have doubts when other ROW corridors don't have them. Wasn't Spadina supposed to have them?
View attachment 63292 Got this in the mail today, should be interesting meeting
Looks like the Highway 27 stop got cut, and from that map it looks like the Humber College stop in now not on campus, but on Highway 27. I wonder if the Humber College stop was moved to make extending the FWLRT to Pearson or a future Woodbine Casino easier. I mean City Council did study extending the FWLRT to Woodbine, so maybe keeping options open for the future?
Original map (at time of funding):
Maybe something like this?Good catch on the moving of the Humber College stop. Yes, I would venture to say that the southward extension is probably the reason. I can't see why Humber College would deny the LRT access, and the cost difference wouldn't be very significant, unless they're really really penny pinching.
Excellent! That lines it up to be extended to Woodbine Centre, Woodbine Racetrack, and Pearson Airport. Perhaps they can extend it all the way to the Renforth transitway station!
Taking the 37 one day, I was surprised at how many people boarded at/near Woodbine Centre.I'd imagine Woodbine Centre/ Woodbine Racetrack as is are off-peak loads and fairly infrequent at that. The real value to that alignment extension would be the connection to Pearson/407 Transitway