News   Dec 20, 2024
UrbanToronto Year-End Poll: Vote on the Best Buildings of 2024, presented by Sapphire Balconies
 1K     5 
News   Dec 20, 2024
UrbanToronto's Social Media Presence Skyrocketed in 2024
 769     2 
News   Dec 20, 2024
Mattamy Homes Records A Year of Accomplishments
 1.4K     0 

Evocative Images of Lost Toronto

Tim MacDonald said:
I'm digging the AA ticket office with the DC7s in the window. They were the pride of the fleet then having been introduced only two years earlier in 1953.
Click to expand...
Such a great glimpse into the past, one of my favourite things about all these historic photos is checking out the old signage and window displays.
 
Hi, it's Mustapha posting for Goldie. He writes:

"When I found this old image, it certainly brought back some wonderful memories of my trips, as a child, on the Cayuga.

It's the only time I had the sensation of being on an ocean voyage.

Sad that such a local excursion is long gone.

Perhaps this will be suitable for the "Evocative images" page.

The cruise ship Cayuga c.1950, once a popular excursion from Toronto to Niagara -- Niagara-on-the-Lake Public Library."

Cruise ship Cayuga c1950..jpg
 
Last edited:
Mustapha said:
Hi, it's Mustapha posting for Goldie. He writes:

"When I found this old image, it certainly brought back some wonderful memories of my trips, as a child, on the Cayuga.

It's the only time I had the sensation of being on an ocean voyage.

Sad that such a local excursion is long gone.

Perhaps this will be suitable for the "Evocative images" page.

The cruise ship Cayuga c.1950, once a popular excursion from Toronto to Niagara -- Niagara-on-the-Lake Public Library."

View attachment 468750
Click to expand...
Fascinating. It would be quaint to be able to take a cruise from downtown to NOTL on a nice summer day instead of being forced to endure the misery of highway traffic. I wonder if there would be a market today for such a thing...
 
Mustapha said:
Hi, it's Mustapha posting for Goldie. He writes:

"When I found this old image, it certainly brought back some wonderful memories of my trips, as a child, on the Cayuga.

It's the only time I had the sensation of being on an ocean voyage.

Sad that such a local excursion is long gone.

Perhaps this will be suitable for the "Evocative images" page.

The cruise ship Cayuga c.1950, once a popular excursion from Toronto to Niagara -- Niagara-on-the-Lake Public Library."

View attachment 468750
Click to expand...
From the Archives, the Cayuga coming into port:

s0380_it0386.jpg
 
Geogblog said:
I think the gargoyle drop was in 1921:

A gargoyle is removed from City Hall after dropping its jaw through the city hall roof. Photo of the gargoyle being installed 20 years ago. Head weighs 500 lbs. Jaw dropped 100 ft through the attic and almost killed a city hall worker in the Works Department draughting room. The city architect wants the dozens of gargoyles to be removed now. It was the gargoyle at the NE corner of the tower which fell yesterday. This gargoyle made of New Brunswick sandstone. These seem to be crumbling in the city air. This gargoyle was 250 ft above ground level, one of 4 around the tower (Toronto Star 9 Mar 1921 p. 1).

The Property Commissioner reports that repairs to the stonework are proceeding. The stonework on the gargoyles was very defective and the stone needs to be removed. Recommended for urgent removal by the City Architect and the stone masons consulted. Scott Bros., stone masons reports that the gargoyle on the SW corner is in fair condition, the others on the other corners are in poor shape. Head, neck, paws of gargoyles to be cut away. George Oakley & Son stonemasons finds the gargoyles dangerous, weather worn and liable to fall at any time, danger of loose pieces falling (Toronto City Council Minutes 1921 Appendix A Property #7 8 Apr 1921 p. 530-531).

The city hall gargoyles are in dangerous condition and are to be cut away. Heads and necks are to go, and perhaps the rest (Toronto Star 8 Apr 1921 p. 14).
Click to expand...
You are correct. The original gargoyles were finally removed in 1939, and the new ones were installed in 2003.
-Terry Murray, author of Faces on Places: A Grotesque Tour of Toronto (Anansi, 2006)
 
  • Like
Reactions: DSC
I'm sticking this here because I don't have a good comparable 'now' shot.

Sigh.

Harbord Street bridge over the Bickford Ravine, under construction: (credit embedded)


1682384650806.png


1682384678068.png

1682384697119.png


1682384728367.png



1682384770572.png

1682384794604.png

1682384820649.png


The water seen above is Garrison Creek, the same creek that flowed through Christie Pits to the north and Trinity Bellwoods Park to the south.

The individual pics are all sourced through the Toronto archives as seen above, but special thanks to the Old Toronto Series on FB for putting them together.
 
Northern Light said:
I'm sticking this here because I don't have a good comparable 'now' shot.

Sigh.

Harbord Street bridge over the Bickford Ravine, under construction: (credit embedded)


View attachment 471879

View attachment 471880
View attachment 471881

View attachment 471882


View attachment 471883
View attachment 471884
View attachment 471885

The water seen above is Garrison Creek, the same creek that flowed through Christie Pits to the north and Trinity Bellwoods Park to the south.

The individual pics are all sourced through the Toronto archives as seen above, but special thanks to the Old Toronto Series on FB for putting them together.
Click to expand...

I don't have a similar shot, but this may be a very similar case to Crawford Street further downstream; the bridge wall appears to still be there.

Untitled.png
2018-04-07_30.jpg

2018-04-07_31.jpg
 
Metroscapes said:
I don't have a similar shot, but this may be a very similar case to Crawford Street further downstream; the bridge wall appears to still be there.

View attachment 472043
2018-04-07_30.jpg

2018-04-07_31.jpg
Click to expand...

The bridge is definitely still there, it was just backfilled, like Crawford. Now, what condition either is really in, if you removed the soil is a bit of a question mark. Both would doubtless require restoration.

I should add, any restoration of ravine topography would not see the stream restored as its been hopelessly intertwined with the combined sewer system. The only place you could hope to surface it and it would still cost $$$ would be
its headwaters just north of St. Clair.
 
You must log in or register to post here.

Back
Top