Rainforest
Senior Member
So you want to save money on the SRT replacement, in order to waste it on Finch, Sheppard, and Eglinton instead.
What makes you think that improved speed and reliability is "waste"?
So you want to save money on the SRT replacement, in order to waste it on Finch, Sheppard, and Eglinton instead.
What being used to do this is a waste of money.What makes you think that improved speed and reliability is "waste"?
So what is this talk about converting the SRT into Toronto's High Line?
Don Peat @reporterdonpeat · 5h 5 hours ago
TTC CEO Andy Byford says they've been told to leave Scarborough RT up to convert it into a park like New York's High Line #TOpoli
Don Peat @reporterdonpeat · 5h 5 hours ago
"Where did that come from?" Cllr Gord Perks on TTC being ordered by commission to convert Scarborough RT into a park #TOpoli
Don Peat @reporterdonpeat · 4h 4 hours ago
Cllr Glenn DeBaeremaeker got #TTC commission to approve converting Scarborough RT into a park #TOpoli
Don Peat @reporterdonpeat · 3h 3 hours ago
"Andy, we're not building a park" @JoshColle shouts as TTC CEO Andy Byford talks to press about Scarborough RT/High Line park #TOpoli
--
While I would like to see alternative uses proposed for the SRT corridor in the case we tunnel, trying to imitate New York's High Line in the suburbs is not going to deliver a desirable result.
It's rich to see Perks who was lambasting Pasternak on twitter for not knowing about voting to throw out the sunk costs during the meeting when it when it seems he himself voted against the motion during the meeting and has seemed to forget all about it.Direct the City Manager to report to the Executive Committee on the feasibility of maintaining the abandoned S.R.T. line and converting it to a public park similar to Manhattan's High Line, once the S.R.T. is decommissioned.
If this were downtown this idea would have merit. But nobody is going to travel to Scarborough to stare at an industrial park and a sparsely used "city centre".
Who cares if people further west turn their noses up. Build it for the people who already live there. The more novel ideas built in the 'burbs, the less the 'burbs feels like the 'burbs.
Who already lives there?
One of the most frustrating things about armchair planners, particularly if they are politicians, is they see something work in one community and think it will automatically work just the same in their own community. Every community is different. They have different priorities, different economic conditions, different social conditions, different geography. Looking at what other places are doing is good, but you have to do some research into why something works in one location and how that location is different from your location, before you can assess whether it is a feasible idea for your community or not.
Would make a good bike path. Tough they'll need to put in ramps to reach the ground from the elevated portions.
Hey, I've got an even better idea. What if we took the money to convert it into a park (couple hundred million in demolition costs, track removal, landscaping, safety upgrades, etc.) - and put that into buying new trains?
Oh, that's right, because let's just throw away the family car and buy a new one, instead of changing the oil in the one we already have.