narduch
Senior Member
This will end up costing so much that it will push back the DRL at least 20 years.
Edit: also why not sell each station and all its building costs to the land developer for future stations that are projected to be adjacent to hubs. (who owns STC anyways?) As crappy as seeing that ghastly penguin logo on the VMC sign it may actually be a viable option to save some money.
Actions speak louder than words. Smarttrack was a sham that both the Provincal Liberals and moreso Tory have to own. They campaigned strongly on a Scarborough subway and neutered it together. That is not a strong voice.
Bridges, like elevated transit, are cheap.The bridge east of Bathurst would have to be torn down and rebuilt.
The only thing that neutered the SSE was it going over its $3.56 Billion budget.
If this thing is doomed to go ahead, as I suspect it may be, then the Lawrence stop needs to be built - deep mining or not - and Smarttrack killed.
- Paul
If sheppard isn't real, why do Duguid, Mammoliti, Karygiannis, etc keep pushing for it?I thought you preferred that the subway be merged with the Sheppard LRT and converted, but now you're really being unreasonable.
Square One/Dixie is next after this...Or...
Murray. Subway. Alignment.
Best of both worlds.
Lawrence East keeps its stop, maybe Ellesmere does too, STC in the same locations saving hundreds of millions from not rebuilding the terminal, whatever cost savings are left over gets us another 1-5 extra stations east. No need for GO stations at Lawrence nor Ellesmere as it duplicates service and GO is supposed to be limited stopping after all.
Then we can close the Bloor-Danforth eastern expansion file forever.
Which cost/whose estimate is that?The latest SLRT cost is not far behind
Which cost/whose estimate is that?
What's your theory as to why that station sank without trace, if it's such a great idea?Or...
Murray. Subway. Alignment.
Best of both worlds.
You mean the estimate that was produced at the request of "someone" but the TTC CEO can't remember who? Well, nothing to worry about there then.The TTC's latest estimate, which assumed that construction didn't start until Crosstown was completed, which was a major factor in the inflated costs. When questioned on it, they admitted that there was nothing preventing construction from starting sooner.
Square One/Dixie is next after this...
What's your theory as to why that station sank without trace, if it's such a great idea?
My original question wasn't clear. Ellesmere was among the least of the Murray alignment issues.I'm pretty sure Ellesmere Stn was axed because it's presently the least used station in the system and the need to start the curvature to get into the east-west SRT alignment has to start south of the existing station. But that doesn't mean - especially after the loss of Midland Station that Ellesmere's numbers couldn't improve. The lack of connection to every passing York Mills bus, like at Lawrence East, is the biggest drawback to numbers.