JGHali
Active Member
I have no respect for a design that puts a transfer before SCC to save costs. Its cheap, poor planning and its whats got us in this mess. There are other solutions that may cost slightly more but not cost near what the underground subway will.
"No respect", eh? Why are transfers intrinsically "poor planning"? Should we have interlined the YUS and BD lines permanently for a "one-seat ride"? After all, if people in the suburbs want such a transfer-less experience, why not take GO? Hmm? One station for $4bn is stupid. Period.
We are debating the "expensive" easy way out 7 stop transfer LRT vs. The most expensive option possible with one stop subway. Both are beyond stupid. If you want to go cheap, then dont use LRT, If they want to actually spend money to invest for the future of Scarborough Centre get rid of the transfer with LRT or subway. No reason only the LRT should be seen as the only above ground option.
Is it worth pointing out that plenty of those trains will short turn at Kennedy? Goodbye "one-seat ride". And, as has been pointed out repeatedly, there are numerous technical and logistic problems with simply refurbishing the SRT. Of course, as it stands, that's the most likely outcome.