Again, why even build a subway, ppl have a way right now to get to Kennedy Station from STC by using the dedicated track system for the SRT. If the SRT is outdated then use LRT technology on the same route.
That was a viable option. But for many residents, that means double transfers just to get to the subway at Kennedy. First, take a bus to SLRT, and then take SLRT to the subway.
Hence, the push to extend the subway, and be able to reach it in a single bus ride.
So you agree with me that it's more expensive to achieve the same goal. So that is the part that doesn't make sense to me.
Obviously, the subway is more expensive. I believe it results in a better network, thus it's not just "same" goal.
Do you live in Scarborough?
No, I live west of Yonge.
I ask this because the EELRT would run thru Scarborough east from Kennedy Station to the Morningside area. That serves way more people than a 2 stop line from Kennedy to STC. The Sheppard East extension to Morningside would cater to a lot more people as well. How can you even debate that?
Debate what? Obviously, there will be more residents within walking distance of a long LRT than within walking distance of just 2 or 3 subway stations.
However, the subway extension will help people who do not live on any of the proposed LRT routes, because their ride to the subway will be shorter. LRT, for the most part, will not help those people.
I live at Morningside and Lawrence, the closest station to me is Kennedy subway station. That is a 45minute bus ride depending on traffic. If the EELRT was built, I would juts take that all the way to Kennedy Station instead of taking the bus and that would cut my commute time in half.
EELRT is a very useful project, which would serve a busy corridor. However:
1) You can benefit either way: EELRT would accelerate your trip to Kennedy, while the subway extension will give you the option of taking the Lawrence bus to the new station at McCowan & Lawrence. The distance from McCowan to Morningside is about 4.5 km, the bus shouldn't take more than 25 min to cover that distance even when the traffic is bad. I regularly take a bus from the Steels / Dufferin area to the Finch subway station, and know how the buses operate.
2) On the other hand, someone living at say Lawrence and Markham Rd wouldn't benefit from EELRT at all. It doesn't make sense to take a bus down to Eglinton, transfer to LRT there, and then ride to Kennedy. In contrast, the subway extension will bring the connection point much closer to that person, with a less than 2 km bus ride to the subway.
3) If you want to have both the subway and EELRT, then starting with the subway kind of makes sense because the funding is harder to secure. EELRT is cheaper, this round of transit expansion isn't the last round, and you will have a good chance to obtain EELRT funding while the subway is under construction.
Now, I would have absolutely no problem if the Scarborough residents chose the LRT network over the subway extension. However, based on the multiple elections results, I conclude that the majority of the Scarborough voters either prefer the subway or don't care either way. Everyone who got elected in Scarborough to a federal, provincial, or municipal office in the last ~ 8 years, is either pro-subway or content with the subway. Noone said "let's cancel the subway and build light rail lines" and got elected.