It's not necessary to be condescending. I'm being perfectly polite here.
Yes, there are some sections, particularly closer to Victoria Park, that are narrower; oops, I hadn't looked there. Going through in detail, I'm not aware of anything narrower than 23 metres. And of anything less than 25 metres that isn't within 2 blocks of Victoria Park.
The only thing that I see that could be problematic is the Victoria Park intersection. Except it's already one-lane eastbound, east of Victoria Park. So there's no need for more than a 20-metre wide right-of-way (and it's at least 23 metres there).
For most of that area along Danforth, the extra land has already been acquired. Much more so than between Victoria Park and Broadview. Didn't we discuss in one of the other threads that the minimum width in Scarborough Township was greater than the 66 feet (one chain) found in Toronto and most of York Township?
I said 27 metres and 15 metres above. I'm remeasuring yet again. I still get 27 metres - or at least 26.5 metres, which is within the accuracy of the notoriously dreadful PIN mapping. Can you show your 25.4 metres?
View attachment 610751]
Which I believe you only need at intersections (though you'd only need 18.8 metres using the standards they used on Woodbine). Which intersection is this an issue? With 20 metres, you still have room for 2.4 metres on each side of the road, for pedestrians. Which is 24.8 metres. Which major intersection doesn't have 24.8 metres?
I don't see anything here that's even mildly insulting. It certainly wasn't meant that way.