News   Nov 22, 2024
 598     1 
News   Nov 22, 2024
 1K     5 
News   Nov 22, 2024
 2.8K     8 

Cycling infrastructure (Separated bike lanes)

A little TY to @robmausser for his giving me a small statistical milestone here at UT
Yes indeed. Perhaps more interesting than the number of reactions is the ratio of Responses to Messages. Your messages get lots of reactions which shows that others either agree (like) them or think you are wrong! I am, almost always, in the like/love column :-> We have UTers who post a lot but get little reaction so others are, I assume, not interested in their posts.
 
Last edited:
This afternoon from the Millwood/Leaside bridge. Concrete barriers have been installed on the SB (west) side! And they have painted bi-directional tracks here. NB has not had concrete installed as yet. Also, they have finally closed the E-W pedestrian crosswalk that showed green to crossing traffic at the same time as the walk signal.

Behold!
1000023886.jpg
 
Yes indeed. Perhaps more interesting than the number of reactions is the ratio of Responses to Messages. Your messages get lots of reactions which shows that others either agree (like) them or think you are wrong! I am, almost always, in the like/love column :-> We have UTers who post a lot but get little reaction so others are, I assume, not interested in their posts.
I think it's more that they are generally very useful/valuable contributions.
 
This in Chris Moise's October Ward Newsletter:

Hello from Copenhagen! My role as your city councillor does not take me outside of the ward too often, but I’m proud to join Associate Professors at the University of Guelph, Dr. Jennifer McWhirter and Brendan Stewart, our Medical Officer of Health, Dr. Eileen de Villa, as well as General Manager for Transportation Services, Barbara Gray, to attend the Implementing Healthy Urban Policy Workshop that is running in Denmark this week.

Hosted by 8 80 Cities, this is a chance for myself and key City staff to learn how Copenhagen has become one of the leading examples for walking, biking and transit. I am learning a lot and look forward to seeing how we at the City could both improve health and safety outcomes while creating beautiful public spaces.

It may be a coincidence that the timing of this workshop aligns with a deeply cynical and backwards announcement from the provincial government, but that makes the news from Queen’s Park no less frustrating. The government is reportedly working on a bill that would restrict cities from removing existing lanes of traffic to accommodate bike lanes.

In the media, Premier Ford has objected to bike lanes on Bloor Street West in Etobicoke. Because he doesn’t like the direction the City is going with expanding our cycling network, he is now going to put his foot down. The willingness of this government to interfere in municipal matters that have had incredible study and consultation, and also overwhelming support at City Council remains baffling. This reported bill, if it moves forward, will threaten future efforts of the City to expand cycling infrastructure across the City, and potentially could include other changes that further limit municipal efforts to mitigate construction impacts.

I am frequently asked to champion new cycling infrastructure. While Premier Ford may disagree with me, I wanted to use my pulpit here to clarify why I support new cycling infrastructure, and why you should too.

In the downtown, widening roads is infeasible; there is no ability to add meaningful additional capacity. Meanwhile, for more than a decade, the City – following provincial planning policy under the Growth Plan for the Greater Golden Horseshoe – has been accommodating significant amounts of density. In a five year period between 2016 and 2021, this ward added over 17,000 new residents, a growth rate of 17.4%. The added pressure on our transportation system, i.e. congestion, naturally follows. As we cannot add 17.4% more traffic capacity for cars, it has become incumbent on the City to get you out of a private vehicle.

As the saying goes, “you’re not stuck in traffic. You are traffic.” Private vehicles are reliable, safe and convenient. We therefore must provide alternatives that are reliable, safe and convenient. For cyclists, that means having a robust network of connected cycling infrastructure that separates them from both pedestrians and larger vehicles. That means expanding Bike Share so there are stations both near where you live and your destination. That means maintaining cycling infrastructure properly when it is disrupted by construction or poor weather.

There are many other health and financial benefits to replacing your car with a bicycle. Less carbon dioxide, fewer fatal traffic accidents and improved personal health. Economically, you end up avoiding thousands of dollars in upkeep, fuel and insurance per year to have a personal vehicle parked for over 90% of the day. Supporting bike infrastructure also supports local businesses. And for those who complain that “they pay taxes” for the roads--falsely suggesting cyclists don’t--well you would pay less taxes on maintaining the vast network of roads in Toronto if more people switched from a car to a bicycle.

Critically, there are absolutely people who do not have an option but to use a vehicle, be it for accessibility reasons or because we haven’t, as a City, provided an alternative. If that describes you, then it means two things.

First, we have more work to do to create alternative modes of transportation that meet your needs. Second, improving your commute by car means getting other cars off the roads. In either scenario, supporting new cycling infrastructure benefits you. I am very happy that a Toronto Centre resident, Alison Stewart, has been announced as Toronto’s Bike Mayor and has been and will continue to be a stalwart advocate for bike infrastructure across the city.

If you were on the fence, I hope I have made the case why this move by the province is completely backward, and will join me in condemning any attempts to limit where new bike lanes can go in Toronto.

Chris Moise
City Councillor
Ward 13 - Toronto Centre
 
In the downtown, widening roads is infeasible; there is no ability to add meaningful additional capacity. Meanwhile, for more than a decade, the City – following provincial planning policy under the Growth Plan for the Greater Golden Horseshoe – has been accommodating significant amounts of density. In a five year period between 2016 and 2021, this ward added over 17,000 new residents, a growth rate of 17.4%. The added pressure on our transportation system, i.e. congestion, naturally follows. As we cannot add 17.4% more traffic capacity for cars, it has become incumbent on the City to get you out of a private vehicle.
Typical politician nonsense:
- Sanctioning and celebrating additional citizens in Toronto which also bring more cars, but then going on to criticize said citizens for their choices
- Posting stats that prove why you shouldn't be removing vehicle lane capacity, but then going to to say we'll do that also

As the city data shows, and as I posted in the other thread, vehicle capacity often goes down with the addition of bike lanes so context matters.
Not just blanket statements that divide the populace.
 
In any event, where is there any criticism of people who drive? The criticism is levied only at the city, which fails to provide adequate alternative options that are safe, reliable and convenient. And at the province, which is actively discouraging the city from providing those options.
 
I rode the newly resurfaced Eglinton West between Chaplin and Avenue Road, where protected bike lanes have also been installed. This is the only segment of EglintonTOday to go in this year, as the city waits for Metrolinx and Doug to figure out the LRT opening.

That aside, the lanes are smooth and well done, without the zig-zaggery of Bloor West Village, or the narrowness of Yonge.

The only missing piece are protective curbs (or maybe just bollards, I forget which they landed on) so for now we have a million traffic barrels, which honestly is better than nothing!

EDIT: It looks like the city committed to pre-cast curbs, at least for this segment. I am not sure that will be consistent across the length of EgTOday.

PXL_20241003_150321114.jpg
PXL_20241003_150325844.jpg
PXL_20241003_150326962.MP.jpg
 
Last edited:
The first of the Fall Consultations now has a live link, courtesy of Councillor Bravo, on Twitter/X:


Survey will open next Tuesday.
 
The first of the Fall Consultations now has a live link, courtesy of Councillor Bravo, on Twitter/X:


Survey will open next Tuesday.

Desperately needed. I can't wait to fill out the survey; I walk or cycle this corridor every day and it looks and smells like shit :(
 
Desperately needed.

Agreed.

I can't wait to fill out the survey; I walk or cycle this corridor every day

Excellent!

and it looks and smells like shit :(

The look may be improved by this project a bit; but the smell...............why does it smell bad? Is that the old gelatin factory?

As to looks, the reconstruction section (Spadina to Davenport will likely get a good spruce up; but the rest of the road is mostly getting the 'interim' treatment (think flexiposts and parking curbs). Worth saying though, Councillor Saxe wants Dupont spruced up, and there is some money to do some work, so you may want to think about any particular spot that makes really great sense to you to make a suggestion in that regard.
 
Last edited:

Back
Top