News   Nov 04, 2024
 326     4 
News   Nov 04, 2024
 477     0 
News   Nov 04, 2024
 471     0 

Baby, we got a bubble!?

http://money.cnn.com/2006/10/09/real_estate/arms_nightmare/index.htm

Teaser ARMs of less than 2% jumping to more than 6% or even 9% after two years. And, you're locked in for 30 years at that new rate!

FYI - I found this using a little-known online search called 'Google' and typing in '2006 teaser ARMs rates'. In less than a minute.

Canadian prices may or may not be higher, relatively or in real terms, than the US in 2006. And it will do no good to our banks nor our housing market as prices moderate or fall. But, let's not pretend we're even close to the craziness that was the US housing market back then.

You made reference to a relative in San Fran so I assumed you had (a) second hand scenario(s) you could share since you were making the original argument. But noted for next time. Google it is. :)
 
4.25 by 2015 is definitely out of the question while the US Fed vows keeping their rates at 0.25 until 2015. If our major trading partner switched from US to China in a short period of 3 years, then I see risk of rates rising.. but I doubt that's going to happen that quickly, if ever.

Although the Fed has pledged to keep rates at 0.25, things can change. Three years is a significant period of time for an economy. Besides, the Bank of Canada has one mandate (inflation), while the Fed is now trying to focus more on Jobs. If both economies begin to see a pickup in inflation, it is very possible that the Bank of Canada will move to increase rates per its mandate, while the US tolerates inflating prices.
 
^^^
I don't think the B of C can move to increase rates even if there is a pickup of inflation unless it really is a massive pick up. The C$ is already higher than the USD at present and if the US stays put, 1% increase in rates would result in probably a 4% or thereabouts currency increase (this is just my estimate) but that would be massively difficult for Canada's economy to adjust to. SO going from 1% to 3 or 4% without a US corresponding move I think is very unlikely (barring the hyper inflation eluded to before which I also do not think will happen).
 
http://www.economist.com/blogs/graphicdetail/2012/09/daily-chart-10

Interesting to see where we stand compared to other countries, especially when it comes to household total debt. I still maintain that the shock in interest rates is not necessary to provoke serious cracks in our "rock solid" r/e market. Household debt is huge, whichever way you slice it. It is not equally distributed, many people have much more than the average 152%. Ownership % at around 70%, also at all time high. It doesn't take much to figure out that sigificant % belongs to both groups (house owners and with above average debt load). I think that is our weaklink, that's where the problem lies. If these people represent 15-20% of the total, which is not unreasonble to assume, we have a big problem.
 
^^^^
I would agree.
I also believe Carney and Flaherty have a fair idea that there is a significant number especially in the past 3 years who have loaded up on debt that are at risk. The very high prices paid in the past 3 years is what puts them at risk.
 
From the National Post today:

http://business.financialpost.com/2012/09/24/toronto-new-home-sales-fall-to-record-low-in-august/
Toronto new home sales fall to record low for August

Garry Marr | Sep 24, 2012 1:51 PM ET | Last Updated: Sep 24, 2012 2:01 PM ET
More from Garry Marr | @DustyWallet
Mark Blinch/Reuters files
Mark Blinch/Reuters files The decline is being felt in both high-rise and low-rise sales.

In yet another sign the housing sector in Canada is slowing down, Toronto new home sales in August were the worst ever for that particular month.

The housing industry is placing the blame squarely on mortgage rules which toughened standards for lending, including cutting the maximum length for amortizations to 25 years for anyone borrowing with mortgage default insurance which is backed by Ottawa.

“The federal government has been working on reducing household debt levels and recently adjusted mortgage lending rules. August was the first full month with the new rules in place and it appears these regulations have affected consumer confidence, resulting in significantly reduced sales of new homes,” said Bryan Tuckey, president and chief executive of the Building Industry and Land Development Association. “BILD will be carefully monitoring new home sales during the next three months to see if this decline becomes a trend.”

Based on statistics from RealNet Canada Inc., the 1,242 homes sold in in August were off from 3,496 a year earlier and the lowest figure for monthly sales since 2009. Through eight months there have been 24,301 new home sales which is down from 30,412 for the same period a year earlier.

The decline is being felt in both high-rise and low-rise sales. High-rise sales, buoyed by the city’s booming condominium market, may finally be slowing. August high-rise sales in the Greater Toronto Area were 645, down from 1,967 a year.

BILD warned any slowdown will have major ramifications for the economy as a whole.

“Confidence in the new homes market is crucial to a healthy economy in the GTA,” said Paul Golini Jr., chair of the group. “This industry employs more than 193,000 people, making it one of the largest contributors to economic growth in Ontario.”

The group said other factors contributing to the slowdown were a lack of housing supply and choice for consumers which can be attributed the Ontario government’s demand for intensification.

“The new homes industry has seen pricing for low-rise homes limit choice in housing options and affordability for many homebuyers,” said the group in a release.

August sales show prices for low rise home rising while condo prices are shrinking. The RealNet New Home Price Index was $609,369 in August which is a 12.7% increase from a year earlier. For high-rises the index price is $436,460, a 4.8% drop from a year ago.





Speaking of condos and in the core in particular: I realize that condo units have been shrinking in size and that they are talking about average prices instead of median prices but the fall off is striking.

Now I know there will be some saying it was the beautiful August weather so people were busy with other things. Also the usual excuses. However, there is no doubt that the slowing appears to be real (unless it changes direction...which seems to me more wishful thinking than based on logic and trends). Price reductions can't be far behind.

I have been asked by one buyer to buy over a contract from 4 years ago at 4 year ago price as well as the person losing almost 1/2 of their downpayment for me to take it over.
the point is there are people out there whose situation has changed, who are fearful.
The problem is once there is a sale at this low price, the tug of war between what most sellers want or are willing to sell for and what buyers are willing to pay gets set in motion.
The buyers believe immediately that the latest price, even though a distressed sale, is the new reality. The sellers don't sell.
A few sales (bargains occur) and then a stale mate for a few months until one side or the other finally blinks.





 
While there is no doubt the slowdown is happening, the GTA real estate market as a whole is made up of drastically different smaller markets. Condo prices are going down although I haven't quite seen the likes of a unit selling at 2008 price levels. The detached single family home in the core Toronto neighborhoods are definitely not seeing a decrease, merely a deceleration in appreciation. Just the last few weeks I've seen homes sell within days and some for well over asking. Granted, the asking prices were lower than what they probably could've listed for earlier this year, but simply put, this tells me that buyers in the prime neighborhoods are still scoping out properties and willing to fight to get it. I really do see SFH prices continuing to rise, which is a somewhat scary notion since we've already surpassed the $800,000 average mark. I can't help but wonder,"When is it going to end?"
 


I have been asked by one buyer to buy over a contract from 4 years ago at 4 year ago price as well as the person losing almost 1/2 of their downpayment for me to take it over.







Mr. (or Mrs.) Interested:

Are you so able to inform us which condo building is suffering from such an implosion of value? Such information may be helpful to the group.
 
^^^
Yes
I have been approached for 1 similar in Ritz; SL and Trump.

Trump I was asked to take over a hotel unit at 5 year ago price.
The Ritz a large unit a couple of months ago @$690/sq.ft. vs. builder asking over $1000/sq.ft.
SL was a larger unit which was bought in 2008 and sold for over a $100K less than that price. That said,
when I bought in SL ( a smaller unit in 2007...the price paid for the larger unit was still up from 2007 price nut only$25/sq.ft. more than I would have bought the same unit for in 2007. )

In any condo building however, there are investors/speculators and with a 5 year time horizon, people's situation changes.
The assignments are always at a discount. The offer was made to me (and in fact someone I know bought it at the same price as I was offered) because the person figured $50K for LTT between TO and Ontario LTT; R/E commission and legals, and then a guaranteed quick out. The person selling actually lost over $150K but by not closing and selling the contract the actual loss was more in the neighbourhood of $50K (but from a 2008 price).

There will be a few of these deals (steals...depending on your perspective)...I am just talking about the higher end product.
Hope this info helps.
 
http://www.economist.com/blogs/graphicdetail/2012/09/daily-chart-10

Interesting to see where we stand compared to other countries, especially when it comes to household total debt. I still maintain that the shock in interest rates is not necessary to provoke serious cracks in our "rock solid" r/e market. Household debt is huge, whichever way you slice it. It is not equally distributed, many people have much more than the average 152%. Ownership % at around 70%, also at all time high. It doesn't take much to figure out that sigificant % belongs to both groups (house owners and with above average debt load). I think that is our weaklink, that's where the problem lies. If these people represent 15-20% of the total, which is not unreasonble to assume, we have a big problem.

Neither your 152% nor 70% statistics are supported by the link, but here's the FP:

http://business.financialpost.com/2012/08/17/home-ownership-in-canada-reaching-new-heights/

http://business.financialpost.com/2...rsion-of-the-u-s-housing-bust-robert-shiller/

I think that buying a house to live in right now -- assuming you want to stay in it for more than 10 years -- is still fine. But woe betide the flipper!
 
Interested I totally agree...why on earth would the BoC keep on warning about interest rate if inflation is below their targeted range and if the world economies are actually expected a lowering of interest to stimulate the terrible economy....why keep on harping about debt load of Canadians if its manageable debt?...
 
Neither your 152% nor 70% statistics are supported by the link, but here's the FP:

http://business.financialpost.com/2012/08/17/home-ownership-in-canada-reaching-new-heights/

http://business.financialpost.com/2...rsion-of-the-u-s-housing-bust-robert-shiller/

I think that buying a house to live in right now -- assuming you want to stay in it for more than 10 years -- is still fine. But woe betide the flipper!

I assumed everybody on this thread knows these numbers by now ... they are quoted daily in every newspaper in Toronto.
 
My point was that your link shows a much less dire view of Canadian debt than your own opinion.

The Economist link provided shows a Household Debt to GDP ratio of 91%.
The media is referencing average Household Debt to Household Income at a ratio of 152%

GDP is not the same as Household Income. Consider the following link from StatsCan that shows the components of GDP
http://www.statcan.gc.ca/tables-tableaux/sum-som/l01/cst01/econ03-eng.htm


Maybe those daily numbers aren't as bad as we think?

Nice try.
 
http://www.canadianbusiness.com/article/98306--canada-s-housing-crash-begins

Canada's housing crash begins

Last spring, Keith Roy noticed his phone wasn’t ringing so often. The Vancouver real estate agent typically booked at least 10 showings a week for the properties he sells in the city. But requests gradually slowed to a trickle. Something was up. His suspicions were confirmed as he watched the market data roll in. On the desirable west side of Vancouver, which Roy considers a bellwether for the region, home sales fell and listings rose. This continued for four straight months. In July, Roy took to his blog to issue an unusual proclamation for a real estate agent: anyone thinking about selling should cash out now. By then, Roy had even sold his own home, convinced it was about to decrease in value. “This is Econ. 101,†he says in an interview. “Supply is up, sales are down. Prices will adjust.â€

Roy’s post, which he edited after offending a few realtors, should be viewed with some skepticism. It does, after all, encourage potential sellers to call a real estate agent—and hey, why not call Roy? But he may be right that the Vancouver market has peaked. In August, the number of sales in Greater Vancouver fell 21.4% from the previous month, after dropping 11.2% in July and 17.2% in June. The Real Estate Board of Greater Vancouver chalked it up to a “summer lull,†but the numbers suggest a trend that can’t be dismissed as simply seasonal. Last month, unit sales were the lowest for any August in the past dozen years, and nearly 40% below the 10-year August norm. Even more worrying, the average home price in Vancouver is now down more than 12% from a year ago—a worrying sign for the country’s priciest city.

People have been predicting a crash in Vancouver for years, of course. What’s different now is the growing number of trends suggesting its imminence. The poor global economy is souring foreign investors’ appetite for expensive property overseas. The federal government, meanwhile, is trying to tame the market by tightening mortgage lending standards and warning the public at every opportunity that Vancouver is a risky city for buying real estate. Interest rates are still low, but the Bank of Canada keeps promising to raise them, which would quickly lower affordability. All of which leads David Madani, an economist with Capital Economics, to conclude: “The Vancouver market has cracked.â€

Vancouver won’t be the only one. The next market to crack will be Toronto, starting with the city’s overheated condo segment. Overall sales of existing homes were down by 12.4% this August over last, and condo sales have fallen by double digits for three months in a row. The pre-construction condo sector is also weakening, with sales down 21% in the second quarter. Overbuilding is a major concern: a record 52,695 units are currently under construction, with another 35,000 in the pipeline, a rate that economists say is well ahead of demographic trends in the region. Investors also play a big role in the Toronto condo market, raising concerns that waves of them will try to cash out at the same time.

For months, policy-makers have expressed concerns about the country’s two biggest real estate markets. Now it’s clear that trouble is ahead. The weakness in both cities marks the start of a reversal in the long boom for Canadian real estate. The doubling in home prices that happened over the past 10 years is not likely to repeat itself. Royal LePage even conceded in a July report that the Canadian housing market has reached a “tipping point.†Forecasts from private economists vary widely. Some are calling for relatively flat prices, while Madani at Capital Economics predicts a 25% decline in Canada’s major cities over the next few years. No markets will feel the slowdown more than Vancouver and Toronto.

What’s surprising about the weakness on the West Coast is the absence of any change in economic fundamentals, such as a spike in unemployment, to explain it. The Vancouver market was cooling even before the latest round of mortgage tightening by Ottawa, which took effect in July.

Nevertheless, theories abound. One explanation favoured by realtors is that foreign investors, particularly those from China, are pulling back. Though there has never been hard data on the presence of wealthy Asian investors, enough anecdotal evidence exists to suggest they have played at least some role in the multimillion-dollar home segment. There are a few reasons why their enthusiasm could now be dampening. China’s economy itself is slowing down and its government imposed new rules that make it more difficult to move money out of the country. “People are much less bullish right now, especially people overseas,†says Brian Persaud, a Toronto real estate agent and investor. “They’re just getting wisps of the story from the big newspapers about how crazy the Toronto market is. So they’re holding off.†In Canada, the banks are also taking a much closer look at the income and assets of wealthy buyers before issuing huge mortgages, according to Roy. “It used to be if you showed up from China and said you owned a business, the bank would just give you the 80% financing,†he says.

A change in buyer psychology may also be occurring, says Madani. “I don’t think there are enough people now who believe we can continue these outsized price gains we’ve seen over the past decade,†he says. “As those expectations change, potential buyers step back.†With Finance Minister Jim Flaherty and Bank of Canada governor Mark Carney constantly warning about Vancouver real estate, it’s not surprising their pleas for restraint are being heeded.

If this change in mindset truly takes hold, the entire Vancouver market will be affected, not just the multimillion-dollar homes. The city’s real estate has always been mind-boggling to outsiders, but reached a particularly confounding peak this year in terms of affordability. The median house price in Vancouver is 10.6 times greater than the median income, according to urban policy consulting firm Demographia. That makes it the second-most-unaffordable major city on the planet after Hong Kong. The only way to account for the market becoming so detached from fundamentals, in Madani’s view, is a pervasive belief among buyers that prices will keep rising. “Vancouver is far, far beyond what anyone would expect, based on trends in immigration, income or interest rates,†he says. “That’s just not sustainable.â€

Of course, easy access to credit is necessary for people to act on their beliefs. Interest rates have been at record lows since the financial crisis in 2008, making it relatively easy to obtain large mortgages. Rates have, in fact, been falling steadily since the 1990s, helping push the home-ownership rate in Canada to a record high of 68.4%, according to Statistics Canada. Household debt has ballooned, whereas wages have not. “If home prices rise substantially above income growth, the only way you’re bridging that gap usually is through mortgage debt,†says Ben Rabidoux, an analyst with boutique research firm M Hanson Advisors.

Some have taken issue with the notion that cheap credit alone is responsible for Vancouver’s exorbitant home prices. Central 1 Credit Union in Vancouver produced a report in June arguing that lack of supply and land constraints explain the pricey local real estate market. As a coastal city, Vancouver just can’t expand easily to accommodate population growth. Rabidoux isn’t convinced by that argument. While he agrees that Vancouver will always command a premium because of its geography, land constraints haven’t exactly impeded construction. Vancouver added one new dwelling for every two additional residents between 2001 and 2011, which is only slightly behind the national average. Secondly, a lack of supply should also push up the average rent in the region. But while the average resale home price has jumped nearly 128% since 2000, rents have risen by just 16.7%, as measured by the Consumer Price Index. “In order to sustain prices at these elevated levels, you need a continuous supply of new buyers willing to take that mortgage debt, and [able to] get it cheaply,†he says. Those buyers may not be forthcoming. Interest rates will inevitably rise, as the Bank of Canada keeps pointing out, and the federal government has instituted numerous changes over the past few years that will make a home purchase more difficult for first-time buyers.

“It seems like Vancouver is past the tipping point,†says Sonya Gulati, a senior economist with Toronto-Dominion Bank. Gulati estimates the market is overvalued by 15% to 20%, and says prices could fall by an equivalent amount over the next two to three years. Rabidoux foresees an even greater decline, perhaps a 30% to 40% fall in average price. The weakness in sales and the rise in inventory is uncomfortably similar to the market drop in late 2008, he says. Back then, the Bank of Canada slashed interest rates and the federal government launched a program to repurchase mortgages from the banks, which sent the housing market rallying. This time, the authorities are taking away support for the housing market. In the past four years, the maximum amortization period for government-insured mortgages has fallen from 40 years to 25. Such tightening makes an immediate rebound unlikely.

While Vancouver took a dive, Toronto has continued to set new price records. But it’s only a matter of time before it, too, slows down, particularly its red-hot condo market. Charles Hanes, a Toronto real estate agent for more than three decades, doesn’t like what he’s seeing today. There has been a big surge in so-called VIP sales events, in which condo developers offer agents and their clients the opportunity to purchase pre-construction units before they go on sale to the general public. Such events cultivate a faux sense of exclusivity and create an urgency to buy immediately, Hanes says. Lately, developers seem increasingly desperate, willing to accept low down-payments and throw in special offers, such as free maintenance for a year, to entice buyers. “That’s a sign the developers know things aren’t rosy. They don’t give anything away—ever,†he says. But what most worries him is that investors are far too exuberant about condos. Typically, investors are concerned about “cash flow,†the money earned through rental income. But prices for new units in Toronto are so high that it’s tough for investors to use rental income to cover the mortgage and maintenance fees and still have something left over for themselves. They’re essentially banking on one thing: price appreciation, which is more akin to speculation. “They’d be better off going to a craps table at Casino Rama,†Hanes says.

The economics started turning negative for new condo investment in Toronto a couple of years ago, but construction boomed nevertheless. There are 343 condo projects under construction or in the sales phase, a record for the Toronto area. (For comparison, there are approximately 20 underway in Chicago.) Over the coming years, more than 87,000 units will be completed, according to research firm Urbanation. The good news is that nearly 80% of those units are already sold. But a large number of those buyers are likely investors who may try to flip their units upon completion. Worse, they could panic when they realize that rental income alone isn’t enough to turn a profit, and flee the market. That would result in an additional supply glut, sending prices down substantially. Signs of oversupply are already showing up. Right now, “people who have bought new condos as an investment are having a difficult time selling them once the building is ready,†says Toronto agent Brian Persaud.

Anticipating what investors will do—and even how many of them are active in the market—is tricky. Don Campbell, founder of the Real Estate Investment Network, a membership-based education and research outfit for individual investors, says those in his network who have purchased new condos tell him they’re financially sound enough to deal with monthly losses until prices rise and they can make an exit. Campbell himself is dubious. “They’re going to be disappointed because the market is not going to perform as well as it has over the last four years,†he says. “The incredible number of units that are going to be coming on the market over the next little while will really start to put a damper on the average sale price of the new condos.â€

Not everyone shares these concerns. Royal Bank of Canada put out a report in July that argued the booming condo market “does not imply a bubble.†According to RBC, the influx of new residents to Toronto over the next few years will be enough to populate the tens of thousands of condo units. A “structural shift†in housing is also happening. Few single-family homes are being built in the city today, which means young families will have to turn to condos.

There are caveats to both arguments. Immigration to Toronto is slowing, with newcomers increasingly choosing to settle outside the traditional destinations of Toronto, Vancouver and Montreal. And the average condo size in Toronto is actually shrinking, making such units less attractive to families.

Toronto prices are still on fire, but even there, some buyers are noticing a slight cooling. Jean Farrugia and her boyfriend have been house hunting since spring, and she’s noticed that recently selling prices have drifted down closer to asking prices. “Some people are buying for $5,000 or $10,000 over asking, whereas in the spring time that was nearly impossible to find.†Farrugia believes that rising interest rates will drive overextended owners to sell. “And I think that will cause prices to go down.â€

What’s happening in Toronto and Vancouver today marks the start of a much broader slowdown in housing. Affordability is becoming an issue in other cities, especially Montreal, Kelowna and Abbotsford, B.C., according to Demographia. Nationwide, the average home price is 5.6 times the average income, says Madani, whereas the norm stretching back to 1975 is 3.5. He admits the price-to-income ratio is not a perfect measure, but says it’s one clear warning sign the market is overheated. Prices ultimately have to fall in line with income. The federal government’s mortgage-tightening efforts will cool the market further, and borrowing costs will rise at some point, slowing demand in a country where the average household debt is already more than 150% of income.

We’re starting to see the signs of a cool-down already. National home sales are falling back in line with the 10-year average, and the Canadian Real Estate Association reported the average home price fell 2% in July compared to the same period the year before. Some markets will no doubt perform quite well over the coming years, as real estate is inherently local, but they will likely be bucking a national trend. Scotiabank estimates Canadian home prices will fall 10% over the next two to three years, followed by a long period of modest gains.

After past housing booms in Canada, the subsequent hangovers lasted many years. The average price in Vancouver fell by more than 20% in real terms between 1995 and 2001 after a steady run-up. Real home prices fell by the same amount during the 1990s in Toronto. Scotiabank, for one, isn’t forecasting anything that dramatic, but even a modest slowdown will affect the economy. People who buy homes spend more on home-related items, and the housing sector has contributed significantly to the country’s economic growth over the past decade. That support would largely disappear. A U.S.-style crash is not on the horizon, but that doesn’t mean Canada won’t feel some pan.

A price adjustment may sound scary, but some say it’s necessary to restore affordability to the housing market and stop Canadians from piling on debt. “We’ve had a very good run in housing over the last decade,†Madani says. “At some point, it just runs out of gas.â€

http://www.canadianbusiness.com/article/98306--canada-s-housing-crash-begins
 

Back
Top