ttk77
Senior Member
Torontonians: Here's your chance to participate in a mayoral debate
http://www.theglobeandmail.com/news...-ask-your-mayoral-candidates/article19850762/
Thanks for the link. I added my question.
Torontonians: Here's your chance to participate in a mayoral debate
http://www.theglobeandmail.com/news...-ask-your-mayoral-candidates/article19850762/
Or, her campaign could be a dud. Just like Tory will be as mayor.
I think so too. It's not that anything she has said on transit isn't true or doesn't make sense. It's just that there's so little vision or desire to change the realities. Yes, you could argue that we don't need to see another politician painting pretty lines on a map. But realistically, that's actually what people want to see in campaigns, especially one so transit-centric.She is now paying for her "no subway now" policy.
I think so too. It's not that anything she has said on transit isn't true or doesn't make sense. It's just that there's so little vision or desire to change the realities. Yes, you could argue that we don't need to see another politician painting pretty lines on a map. But realistically, that's actually what people want to see in campaigns, especially one so transit-centric.
Those are really bad numbers for Chow.
I see as lot of similarities between Chow's campaign and Wynne's recent campaign. Stay positive and campaign on hope and optimism. Maybe voters are "hoped out." Or the Chow camp thinks that the voter zeitgeist will trend towards them come October.
If I had to point to one reason why Chow's support is dropping, I'd say the debates. Chow seems to be in the same position as Barbara Hall back in 2003. She's just not a forceful orator. Tory's much better at public speaking. There was a reason Miller and Tory left everyone in the dust near the end of the campaign in 2003: people started paying attention to the debates.
There's also the fact that she doesn't seem to be promising much. Some of her policy statements have been sensible but she comes off as a little too cautious to be appealing. She might be right about the DRL, for example, but a candidate who appears ambitious and presents a plan. however, misguided, is going to get more attention than one who says 'Whoa, let's not get carried away here ... there's no money ... we can't do anything big for a while yet'.
If I had to point to one reason why Chow's support is dropping, I'd say the debates.
I think the Scarborough Subway is another main reason. After years of debate the City was fatigued and going back to the failed plan really made her look like yesterdays candidate.