News   Dec 15, 2025
 226     0 
News   Dec 15, 2025
 1.5K     1 
News   Dec 15, 2025
 447     0 

2008 Global Cities Index

Whoaccio

Senior Member
Member Bio
Joined
Feb 13, 2008
Messages
1,686
Reaction score
0
Okay, Foreign Policy Magazine, in conjunction with A.T. Kearney and The Chicago Council on Global Affairs to create a ranking of global cities. According to their site:
Specifically, the Global Cities Index ranks cities’ metro areas according to 24 metrics across five dimensions. The first is business activity: including the value of its capital markets, the number of Fortune Global 500 firms headquartered there, and the volume of the goods that pass through the city. The second dimension measures human capital, or how well the city acts as a magnet for diverse groups of people and talent. This includes the size of a city’s immigrant population, the number of international schools, and the percentage of residents with university degrees. The third dimension is information exchange—how well news and information is dispersed about and to the rest of the world. The number of international news bureaus, the amount of international news in the leading local papers, and the number of broadband subscribers round out that dimension.

The final two areas of analysis are unusual for most rankings of globalized cities or states. The fourth is cultural experience, or the level of diverse attractions for international residents and travelers. That includes everything from how many major sporting events a city hosts to the number of performing arts venues it boasts. The final dimension— political engagement—measures the degree to which a city influences global policymaking and dialogue. How? By examining the number of embassies and consulates, major think tanks, international organizations, sister city relationships, and political conferences a city hosts. We learned long ago that globalization is much more than the simple lowering of market barriers and economic walls. And because the Global Cities Index pulls in these measures of cultural, social, and policy indicators, it offers a more complete picture of a city’s global standing—not simply economic or financial ties.
2959998153_dee45bc84a.jpg


http://www.foreignpolicy.com/story/cms.php?story_id=4509
 
I gotta say, I am a bit surprised they ranked Toronto 4th culturally... Maybe it is just Toronto brand pessimism, but I find that somewhat hard to swallow. Pretty decent showing on the whole though (take it Sydney!)
 
Three cities in BosWash, and three cities in the Pearl River Delta (though two of those three are down the list for now). That I find rather interesting. Though Toronto's position is impressive, even if it is the only Canadian city there.

I've been to 10 of the cities, 2 more if you add the airports!
 
Best to take all these rankings with a grain of salt. Yes, it's nice if we come out ahead, but give me a break.

Given the economic chaos swirling around us, surely it's out of date already. Moscow must surely be down several spots by now. Not to mention cultural experience - Moscow is Number 6. Now, I know that Moscow doesn't even have real newspapers any more - they're not allowed to. How can a city that is moving towards an absolutist form of government and where dissent is shuttered be Number 6 in any kind of cultural ranking? Seems silly to me.
 
I'm just happy to see lists like this because they are convienent circumstantial ammunition against the circumstantial evidence that Toronto "is a city in decline"

Sure, it's just a list like any other list. But at least it's one that doesn't have us going apesh*t for once.
 
Brussels at 13? hmmm... I guess the EU carries them a long way.

Top 5 pretty much spot on, and I don't think the top 10 is too far off although i don't think Chicago deserves to be so high simply because of its rank in human capital. The other indicators are all pretty much in the 20s.

But, as mentioned take it with a grain of salt I guess.
 
As a non-Torontonian now, hearing Torontonians complain about the "decline" of their city makes me laugh every time I return. I mean, really... where else is so much going on?
 
http://www.thestar.com/News/GTA/article/520912

TOP 10 CITIES

The top 10 "global cities," according to Foreign Policy magazine, A.T. Kearney consultants and The Chicago Council on Global Affairs. The rankings were based on five broad criteria – business, culture, human capital, global political influence and centrality to global information flows.

1. New York
2. London
3. Paris
4. Tokyo
5. Hong Kong
6. Los Angeles
7. Singapore
8. Chicago
9. Seoul
10. Toronto


Toronto 4th in world for culture

Oct 21, 2008 04:30 AM

Iain Marlow
Staff Reporter

Note: This article has been edited to correct a previously published version.

Toronto ranks as the world's fourth best city to experience culture, behind only London, Paris and New York, a new study on globalization has found.

Washington, D.C.-based Foreign Policy magazine's inaugural Global Cities Index, in the November/December issue, assesses 60 urban areas around the globe in five broad categories: business, human capital, culture, global political influence and the centrality of the city to global information flows.

The "cultural experience" category tallies cities' international sporting events and international travellers, and assesses their restaurants, museums and performing arts.

Toronto received praise for the quality and cosmopolitan nature of its cuisine – 94 per cent of our top restaurants are "international" – and the city's place in the North American touring circuit.

The survey's data also cites Massey and Roy Thomson halls and the Toronto Symphony Orchestra.

Toronto placed 10th overall out of the 60, edging out Washington, D.C., which came in 11th. But Toronto ranks lower in international business and global political influence, 26th and 24th respectively.

Toronto fared better as a place of international learning, as the 13th best place to take a university degree. In that category, it's sandwiched between Bangkok and Madrid – and distant from London, Tokyo and Singapore, all in the top five.

The top business cities were New York, Tokyo, Paris, and London, while Washington, D.C. placed first in terms of international political influence.

Kolkata, India, ranked 60th, placed close to last in every category.

Four of the top 10 "global cities" were in North America, four in Asia and two in Europe.

"The term itself conjures a command centre for the cognoscenti. It means power, sophistication, wealth, and influence. To call a global city your own suggests that the ideas and values of your metropolis shape the world," the authors wrote.

Foreign Policy has published indexes measuring countries' levels of globalization, and ranked the world's top 100 public intellectuals.

*****

I find it somewhat surprising that Toronto made it to the Top 10, and it's not because I'm pessimistic. I just think that Toronto earned its spot a bit on the cheap, without making too much of an effort. Toronto stands out on its own... it is not the metropolis of a global or regional empire like London, Paris, Moscow, New York/Washington or Tokyo. Nor did it have to throw out billions of dollars on prestige projects like cities in China, Moscow and especially Dubai to "buy" world-class city status. Toronto seems to have gotten its status just with simple things- good quality of life, multiculturalism, a healthy economy, excellent social welfare, and a couple of pro sports teams. (considering the number of home games the Blue Jays play, no wonder we are #4 in cultural experience by GCI's criteria!)

Now that we have world-class status, why don't we put away our pessimism and celebrate our global city status, just like the city where I come from:

eindexbg_061.jpg
 
We have four daily newspapers + two alt-weeklies of note + two subway papers--maybe that skews the "culture" quotient...
 
The GTA has more golf courses per capita than anywhere else in the world. I wonder if they counted that as culture.

really? That is a fun tidbit... golf course are sporting venues, so it must have.

I think culture is skewed because all of the diners and "local" type restaurants got replaced by sushi & bubble tea in the 1990s. So, someone having a bento box in Toronto is more "cultural" than someone having a hotdog in Chicago. We are also probably skewed upwards because of our large immigrant population, very international.
 
Best to take all these rankings with a grain of salt. Yes, it's nice if we come out ahead, but give me a break.

Given the economic chaos swirling around us, surely it's out of date already. Moscow must surely be down several spots by now. Not to mention cultural experience - Moscow is Number 6. Now, I know that Moscow doesn't even have real newspapers any more - they're not allowed to. How can a city that is moving towards an absolutist form of government and where dissent is shuttered be Number 6 in any kind of cultural ranking? Seems silly to me.

Moscow's cultural assets are pretty staggering, actually. The Kremlin museums, Tretyakov, etc.

edit: should say, much as I am flattered and all, number 4 in culture for TO is pretty wonky, and would definitely require a pretty heavy Spacing-ista/messy urbanist weighting, and I'm not sure how that stuff is supposed to be measurable. Being ahead of Berlin is...odd.
 
I've not been to Moscow, but I am certainly willing to believe that their big ticket cultural attractions are top rate. I guess my point is that the dynamism of their culture must suffer in their current environment.

Anyways, my bigger point is, live by the "City Ranking", die by the "City Ranking". I can't help but be tickled that we're high, but I dismiss the results nonetheless because I think the exercise is fundamentally flawed and meaningless.
 

Back
Top