News   Dec 20, 2024
 1.1K     5 
News   Dec 20, 2024
 835     2 
News   Dec 20, 2024
 1.7K     0 

10th Anniversary of the Toronto Megacity

Long Island Mike

Senior Member
Member Bio
Joined
Apr 25, 2007
Messages
2,180
Reaction score
18
Everyone: In one month and one day-the start of 2008-The City of Toronto
United after disolving the 6-borough Metro government-will be 10 years old. Will the City celebrate 10 years united as one and in this topic what has improved-or what has NOT improved-in the past 10 years? How is the City of Toronto government today compared to when the 6 boroughs existed: Etibocoke,York,North York,East York,Scarborough and the old City of Toronto.
I feel there may be many strong opinions out there-anyone have any thoughts or other observations? How will the next 10 years be?
Long Island MIKE
 
Likely there will be no celebrations, but expect newspaper article after newspaper article complaining about where we went wrong since then.
 
An interesting facet of the pre-amalgamation days was how the individual municipalities lobbied for their own subway projects. North York got theirs through, which put pressure on the province to fund an Eglinton West line for York. And the plans were created, and the heavy equipment started work. The hole was filled in, and there has been almost no serious talk of it since. And this wasn't so long ago (1995).
 
You can thank Mike Harris for that one... and it had nothing to do with Amalgamation.
 
Amalgamation didn't save any money (as the Harris Tories claimed) and it has pretty much created an obnoxious city core/suburban cleavage on council and in mayoral elections.

I also find it annoying that some seem to think it made Toronto a bigger city -ten years Toronto had about 650,000 people in the city proper, but overnight it became 2.5 million. Now we can say it's "about the same size as Chicago" even though more than half of it is post-1950 suburbs.

Howard Levine suggested a few years having a GTA-wide government along the lines of the GVRD or Metro in 1953 (when 905-land wasn't part of the metro area yet), while turning the four community council areas into independent municipalities. At the very least we can give some power back to the community councils, turn them into de-facto boroughs.

Still Toronto's amalgamation isn't nearly as bad as that of Ottawa - imagine places like Caledon and King townships being part of the Megacity!
 
Amalgamation didn't save any money (as the Harris Tories claimed) and it has pretty much created an obnoxious city core/suburban cleavage on council and in mayoral elections.

I also find it annoying that some seem to think it made Toronto a bigger city -ten years Toronto had about 650,000 people in the city proper, but overnight it became 2.5 million. Now we can say it's "about the same size as Chicago" even though more than half of it is post-1950 suburbs.

Howard Levine suggested a few years having a GTA-wide government along the lines of the GVRD or Metro in 1953 (when 905-land wasn't part of the metro area yet), while turning the four community council areas into independent municipalities. At the very least we can give some power back to the community councils, turn them into de-facto boroughs.

Still Toronto's amalgamation isn't nearly as bad as that of Ottawa - imagine places like Caledon and King townships being part of the Megacity!

It is impossible to know whether or not amalgamation resulted in any savings or not. Any kind of objective assessment, given the downloading that occurred at the same time, quickly bogs down in a quagmire. And to truly understand whether or not there were "savings" would arguably require an understanding of how local government would have functioned 1998-2008 without amalgamation -- good luck.

Ultimately, I firmly believe that any positions one hears next year as to whether amalgamation was a success or a failure, or led to savings or greater costs, is just rhetoric.

Some people will point to one discreet aspect of local government, say snow ploughing in East York for example, and on that basis conclude that amalgamation was a failure or success. And I suppose if the state of the ploughed roads in East York is the only municipal matter that matters to you, that is a good basis for making that determination. But we have no way of assessing the state of East York's finances, and its snow removal budget, had amalgamation never occurred, given the years of provincial and federal cutbacks, etc. So, even if you decide to measure amalgamation solely on the basis of snow removal, it's still all just speculation and rhetoric.

As for the suburban/urban cleavage on council, that cleavage already existed on the old Metro Council, which was responsible for many of the big-ticket municipal matters. And, in any event, that cleavage on the amalgamated council can often be more imagined than real, depending on the issue. One only has to listen, for example, to Case Ootes or Howard Moscoe to know that the stereotypes don't always apply.
 
Toronto Street Festival & Memo to Staff

There use to be an inspiring and very symbolic annual party called the Toronto Street Festival that commemorated the birth of the new mega city. It was celebrated on Yonge Street with 5 large themed celebration sites. The Opening Ceremonies was held at Yonge and Eglinton, the symbolic heart of Toronto which crosses all 5 former cities. A reported 1 million people attended the 3 day festival, held on the first weekend of July.

The Toronto Street Festival celebrated the very best of Toronto; sadly it was cancelled last year because of budget cuts and remaining funds redirected to support the new Toronto Comedy Festival (imported concept from Montreal), and the new arts festival called Nuit Blanche (imported concept from Paris – a big hit in 2006, not so much in 2007) ). The way I look at it, the city sacrificed a long established and award winning festival that celebrated itself, in favour of two unproven and imported festivals from other cities.

On another note, the National Post printed this memo written by the City Manager sent out to staff. I believe it gives a good run down on the history, challenges and accomplishments of the mega city over the last 10 years.

Louroz

http://www.nationalpost.com/news/story.html?id=161249

Hoy Memo
National Post
Published: Tuesday, December 11, 2007
Date: Mon, 10 Dec 2007 18:12:56 -0500

Subject: Important message to staff from Shirley Hoy, City Manager

To: The Toronto Public Service

From: Shirley Hoy, City Manager


In our very busy professional lives it's sometimes difficult to take the time to reflect on all it is we do each and every day. And when we do take that time, we're often taken aback by what we see, hear and read about our workplace. After all, we are an open and transparent government -- the public's right to know trumps all else, as it should.

Toronto Life magazine's current issue has a cover story, however, that tells an unflattering tale about City Hall. Some of you may have already read it. Some of you may have only heard about it. Regardless, the story is incomplete.

I won't provide you with a history lesson here, but a little context about where we've been, how we got to where we are today, and where we're going is required.

Ten years ago, the City of Toronto was amalgamated into the single largest city in the country, in effect, making us the sixth largest government in Canada. The expectations of amalgamation by residents, the provincial government, and staff themselves, were enormous. Yet we succeeded.

The chaos of amalgamation cannot be overstated. Quite simply the challenges posed by melding seven distinct administrations into one, without time to adequately prepare, were overwhelming.

We had to deal with the exceptional pressures posed by downloading, including the capital costs of the TTC. We had to implement a promised freeze on taxes, deal with the impending Y2K crisis, and manage the introduction of the new Current Value Assessment system.

Yet, service and program delivery continued without interruption. The amalgamation process was seamless to the public. Thanks to you. We have hit some bumps in the road, to be sure. A labour disruption in 2002 brought home to many, just how important public services are to residents and businesses. The Bellamy Inquiry (MFP computer leasing) helped shed light on some of our failings. Lessons learned from the Inquiry have helped shape important policies and decisions for this government.

Public debates over the future of Union Station and the Island airport exemplify just how passionate the people of Toronto are. It is the people that we serve everyday and I know how grateful they are for your dedication to issues big and small. I needn't remind anyone that in 2003 this city was faced with SARS, followed by the blackout in August. Governments are expected to deal with crises like these. We did. And we did so professionally, always with the people of Toronto in mind.

Over the years, many reports and studies have been tabled examining how the Toronto Public Service should be organized, how it should support Council, and how it should be accountable for a multi-billion dollar budget. Many of these recommendations have been implemented.

The former Auditor General for Canada, Denis Desautels, wrote a report that pointed the way to greater accountability and transparency with the

establishment of a comprehensive auditing regime that included both the Auditor General and Internal Audit functions. We have done that. As well, the PATH to Excellence initiative established clear lines of authority for staff, introduced key management controls and protocols, and further enhanced accountability, fairness and transparency in the City's business and purchasing processes.

And while there's always room for improvement, it bears repeating that the Auditor General's recommendations, to date, illustrate that the City can make the changes required to be both effective and efficient. Eighty per cent of the Auditor General's 800 recommendations from 1999 on have been implemented. Recent audits in specific areas of Children's Services and Solid Waste Management have concluded that those areas are well-managed and effective.

In an organization as large as the City, there will be problems of waste and fraud from time-to-time. Mature, professional governments both recognize and address problems when they arise. The fraud and waste hotline, for example, corroborates the fact that the vast majority of you operate within the highest standards of ethics and integrity. When that doesn't happen, swift and appropriate action is taken. Calls to the hotline and substantiated complaints dropped more than 10% in 2006 over the previous year. In fact, substantiated claims represent less than one percent of the entire public service. The City administration supports the fraud hotline and communicates its availability widely.

We introduced a new administrative structure to achieve greater flexibility, accountability, oversight and collaboration amongst City divisions. There's greater emphasis on customer service improvements today. The 3-1-1 project is well underway, on-line registration and fee payment options are available to residents and businesses.

Indeed, to meet the challenges that all large organizations face today, new talent is regularly introduced to the City's management and frontline ranks. Formal succession planning is underway across the City to ensure a strong public service in the future.

By far, however, our greatest challenge remains a financial one. Year after year, you hear the story about the City's budget shortfall. This government, under Mayor David Miller, has led the charge in achieving a new deal for cities.

We succeeded in getting the GST rebate and a share of the gas tax. The province has promised to begin uploading social programs again, starting in 2008.

The City of Toronto Act helped solidify what we all know: this is a mature order of government, unique from other cities in Ontario. We have new powers of taxation that have been debated very publicly.

But cities need revenues that grow with the economy. Toronto has put that issue on the table to the point, now, where the Federation of Canadian Municipalities and even the premier of Ontario are calling on the federal government to share the equivalent of one cent of the GST with Canadian municipalities -- the economic engines of Canada.

Toronto is a leader in many respects. I am enormously proud of you -- the women and men of the Toronto Public Service. The real test for quality public services is the work that is done to ensure an excellent quality of life for residents.

And because of you we have clean drinking water. Garbage and recycling gets picked up. Roads are repaired. Swimming pools are clean and safe. Parents have reliable child care. Police, fire and EMS are professional, reliable and committed to residents and businesses. The TTC is relied upon by more than one million people everyday. The single largest social housing stock in the country is right here in Toronto. Our culture and arts community has never been more vibrant. Our waterfront is finally beginning to take shape and reflect what Torontonians want and need.

People are engaged in helping shape the future of our parks -- their parks. And we have a bold, daring and aggressive plan to tackle climate change -- the single greatest threat to our planet.

Toronto has been 10 years in the making. We are a young organization.

We will continue to grow and improve. That is what we do as committed public servants: meet the demands of the public we serve. Without a doubt, each of you does it with dignity, professionalism and respect for the public you serve, and for that I thank you.


Shirley Hoy

City Manager
 
I'd rather have Nuit Blance and a comedy festival than the Celebrate Toronto Street Festival. Ideally though I'd like to have them all. Hopefully it's revived.
 
The Celebrate Toronto Street Festival was weak, unstructured, not all that established, and there was no huge outcry when it died its timely death. The concept of "celebrating" the megacity was obviously from Lastman's mind - he was one of few to to benefit from it, most residents were opposed, and even today, it is not considered a big success.
 
Have to agree with Syn and SeanTrans. There wasn't much to "Celebrate Toronto" -- it was really unimaginative, and not very interesting. I'm glad that the city has decided to focus its monies and energies elsewhere.
 
Celebrate Toronto Street Festival

The Celebrate Toronto Street Festival was focused on families and communities. While the same can't be said about the Comedy Festival or Nuit Blanche which are focused on the 19+ demographics. I suspect many of you didn't enjoy it because you don't have any families yourselves. The first key word here is families, there is a severe lack of free and high quality festivals in Toronto that cater to the entire family.

The other key word is communities, the Street Festival was spread over 5 sites, It pumped millions into the local businesses and BIA's around the celebration sites over 3 days, as opposed to just one evening or one concentrated site.

I also have to remind many of you that the VERY POPULAR Summerlicious program went hand in hand with the Celebrate Toronto Street Festival. Together it was a true celebration of the best of Toronto.

The Street festival was an award winning festival that brought several international acts never seen before in Toronto and North America. It was the first major festival to program Yonge-Dundas Square, it provided a platform for local musical artists and dance groups to perform, it provided a rare opportunity to close down large portions of the world's longest street and truly celebrated the diversity of Toronto.

Finally, as I mentioned before, it was truly a Toronto event that celebrated the birth of a new city. It was not an imported pre-packed festival format from another city (Comedy Festival - Montreal, Nuit Blanche - Paris). The name of the event said it all Celebrate Toronto Street Festival.

As for nobody missing it, the public wasn't consulted and the event was quitely cancelled to support two unproven festivals. The world doesn't need another comedy festival and Luminato can easily swallow and probably do a better job of running Nuit Blanche as one of its events than the city. The city should restore funding to the Celebrate Toronto Street Festival.

Louroz
 
Celebrate Toronto was the embarassment of the summer festival/BIA-circuit in T.O. I wouldn't dream of taking any out-of-towner to that thing. It's few first years were o.k. as more intersections were involved and some new ideas were tried (an HMV indie stage, restaurants and bars being allowed temporary patios on Yonge St, etc.). However, later years were overly-corporate and overly devoted to families. I'm sure on some level it was a success, but it didn't seem to "get" what Toronto was about and therefore few care about its demise.
 

Back
Top