mysteryman
Active Member
^ in a house!
Shouldn't the gym be more than 7 feet from the martini bar?
Why do so many new condos in Toronto have the kitchen sitting out in/facing onto/being in the middle of the living room? Urgh.
It was a trait I really didn't like seeing with Cityplace - there, as with these plans, some suites have you entering to walk right into the kitchen.
That screams cheap to me - and bad planning as well.
Is this me being overly critical? - or is it some kind of new chic I've misplaced?
Personally I can't think of anything better than lifting some weights, while drinking an Apple Martini inbetween reps.
That's because Wikipedia skyscraper entries are edited by people who frequent geeky forums. The average person doesn't know or care what a "supertall" is. And while developers would know, they usually don't really care. Wikipedia is neither an accurate representation of cultural discourse, nor an accurate representation of how the development industry thinks.While you are correct in stating that there is no 'mythical 300 meter mark,' the term itself is widely used in the field of architecture. Not only does it appear in several of my textbooks to describe the tallest of structures, it is one of the larger categories of buildings on Wikipeida - not Emporis, not SkyscraperPage, (well...it is on those too, but you get my point) Wikipeida. While Im not advocating Wikipeida as a scholarly resource, I am advocating that it is an accurate representation of cultural discourse - in this case, the discourse of Architecture in 2007.
What I'm trying to say is that the term supertall, and to a lesser extent the 300 meter mark, are real concepts which exist in the tangible world of architecture, not just in the backwaters of geeky forums.
Because they're residential buildings and people living in high rises want an outdoor space. I don't get why people on UT are so down on balconies. To begrudge balconies through some idea of architectural purity reeks of snobbery. They're an integral part of people's homes and honest to the use of the building. It's where people live, of course it's going to look a little messier than a 9-5 office building. That's not a bad thing. Besides, architects have got pretty good at incorporating balconies into the design of skyscrapers. The ones on 18 Yorkville look amazing, and they're even precast!The lanai's are a terrible Idea.... I am still trying to figure out why every building in toronto feels it necessary for condos to have balconies... or "lanais" ... The Ritz Did it right, No balconies, same as Trump. The nicer projects realize that well... we live in Canada and for 8 months of the year, balconies are unused. They block light form coming into the unit itself, and often wind up an extra storage place.