News   Dec 20, 2024
 3.8K     11 
News   Dec 20, 2024
 1.3K     4 
News   Dec 20, 2024
 2.1K     0 

Search results

  1. C

    Guelph-Cambridge Initial Business Case - Battery Multiple Units now proposed

    https://www.guelphtoday.com/local-news/business-case-for-guelph-cambridge-go-trains-heading-to-council-9913736 I think this is where the project dies. There's little incentive for Guelph because they're getting their GO expansion already. Then there's Metrolinx who will likely have no time for...
  2. C

    VIA Rail

    I'm curious why they would go with both a panorama lounge and a dome. It seems like the dome is made redundant. Having a car that will only be used for the Canadian is a wasteful extravagance. Not sure why they wouldn't want the dome on the Ocean as well if they are going to order them...
  3. C

    Ontario Northland/Northern Ontario Transportation

    You deal with it on a case by case basis as is done now. It's not as if roads in the north are blocked 50% of the time. It doesn't constitute a crisis. Subsidies are fine if used correctly, but here they will likely bring down a politically vulnerable service that has been on the brink of being...
  4. C

    Ontario Northland/Northern Ontario Transportation

    BCRs are fairly comprehensive and take a wide range of anticipated impacts into account. Even if not perfect, they provide a reasonable benchmark to compare this investment against other options. A negative BCR weighed against the backlog of projects elsewhere that have a positive BCR suggest...
  5. C

    Ontario Northland/Northern Ontario Transportation

    Could you imagine if they suggested extending it even further to somewhere like Timmins? These fantasy maps really are something.
  6. C

    Ontario Northland/Northern Ontario Transportation

    Okay, say that this justification wasn't iffy on its own and hasn't been at least partially refuted in subsequent replies, the BCR of the Northlander is still negative. This means that doing nothing and not restoring it is a better outcome than investing in it. We could have taken the funds that...
  7. C

    Lack of meaningful Passenger Rail service outside the Quebec-Windsor Corridor

    Sure, but that causes a lot of extra friction and cuts your overall demand. It also isn't fair to expect taxpayers across Canada to see their taxes pay for infrastructure in a separatist region when their own areas are deprived of transport options, even busses. This is why you have to let the...
  8. C

    Quebec-Windsor Corridor

    You do realize that member-adopted resolutions have basically zero influence on party policy right? If you want to know what PP thinks about it, you have to wait until the election platform at the earliest. The reason he hasn't spent any time criticizing it is because the project has...
  9. C

    Lack of meaningful Passenger Rail service outside the Quebec-Windsor Corridor

    Exactly. Canada doesn't have a future (I don't think western separation is nearly as realistic though). As it stands with HFR at this point, I don't want all that political capital and public investment to go into a project where it will be rug pulled and end up on the other side of an...
  10. C

    Lack of meaningful Passenger Rail service outside the Quebec-Windsor Corridor

    https://www.theglobeandmail.com/opinion/article-the-unity-crisis-that-awaits-us-on-the-other-side-of-the-next-election/ I don't exactly like digging up old posts in threads, but I felt that this article gave a good illustration as to why I don't concern myself with the fate of interprovincial...
  11. C

    Lack of meaningful Passenger Rail service outside the Quebec-Windsor Corridor

    I agree that with this. The LDS will almost certainly die with the HEP and Ren fleets IMO. Another interesting hypothetical. I personally think that the CPC will go full austerity and say no to federal funding of basically any infra. Ford has been buoyed by investing in stuff like transport to...
  12. C

    Lack of meaningful Passenger Rail service outside the Quebec-Windsor Corridor

    I will preface that this is entirely my perception, but I believe that you are wrong to interpret Pollievre as a rational actor governed by logic. He isn't as much beholden to specific voters than he is to corporate interests and general libertarian and anti-Trudeau vibes. As much as he rides...
  13. C

    Quebec-Windsor Corridor

    More like Canada's Javier Millei, but I get the sentiment.
  14. C

    Quebec-Windsor Corridor

    I'm not sure what about my previous posts makes you think I would want to see the end of intercity rail in Canada. What I really want is to see rail used effectively, and to be run competently. Discussion here lately has softened my views on VIA a bit, but after watching how HFR has unfolded...
  15. C

    Quebec-Windsor Corridor

    To be honest, the PC's absolute domination is completely unshakeable despite multiple scandals worse than any of their predecessors. Nothing seems to stick to them and the opposition is highly ineffective. I could see the PCs staying in power well into the 2030s. It would likely be smart for...
  16. C

    Quebec-Windsor Corridor

    Well, with any luck the province of Ontario may come into the possession of 32 new Siemens trainsets in coming years.
  17. C

    VIA Rail

    Interesting. I think my opinion that the new fleet will not be funded the CPC supermajority gains some credibility here. If they don't have the money in their hand now, there's no way it will stick around. A funding commitment of this amount will certainly be seen as a boondoggle.
  18. C

    Guelph-Cambridge Initial Business Case - Battery Multiple Units now proposed

    So a small branchline shuttle then? I'm still at somewhat of a loss as to why a bus service would not suffice here in the long term. The distance is too short and the cities are too small. This doesn't seem to be a corridor where rail makes sense, both operationally and from a capital...
  19. C

    Guelph-Cambridge Initial Business Case - Battery Multiple Units now proposed

    I really don't enjoy pouring cold water on transit projects, but according to the attached document this project would spend hundreds of millions on less than 1000 riders per day. It's not worth it. There is very little potential here to capture riders from cars, and this is not helped by poor...
  20. C

    General railway discussions

    If HFR is built there would be no incentive or reason to let slow stopping GO trains on an express line to hold up other traffic. Also HFR should bypass Peterborough if it is at all interested in having competitive travel times. But moving on, I'm going to cross-pollinate from this thread to...

Back
Top