....or his replacement. Heaven & Hell is my favourite Sabbath album. Watch the live Wacken concert from 2009 on youtube...there's Dio, 66 years old and dying of cancer, and still sounding pretty awesome.
Jefferson thought the bible was BS (as did pretty much all of the founding fathers). And the whole slavery bit kinda eats away at that "freedom" concept wouldn't you say? I know...and I hate being the killjoy.
Canada has a lot of freedoms due to the modern bit of legislature in 1982 called the Charter of Rights and Freedoms. And it exists in spite of so-called judeo-christian beliefs.
That could be our first act of the post-Ford era.
The War On Cars....BACK ON SUCKERS!!!
Though one could argue that the teachings of Christ is what set the slaves free. Lincoln, though not necessarily a Christian, was very fond of the bible and would often quote it. And he was the one that freed blacks. Jesus wasn't a proponent of slavery. He spent most of his time with those that rest of society shunned (gays, prostitutes, thieves, etc.) He believed that all of us are equal, regardless of our beliefs. Personal freedom
is due to Christianity. Atheism is largely antagonistic towards anyone who believes in God. The mainstream atheist culture isn't exactly welcoming to Christians. Whereas Christ demands that His followers love not just their fellow men, women and children, but those who disagree with them and even especially those who hate and mock them. Christ permits people to live their lives the way they want. Try doing that in an Islamic nation, where non-muslims and gays are murdered by their government. It's interesting and ironic that liberals go to great lengths to absolve or overlook the evils of Islam (yes, there are many lovely muslims people too) and call it a religion of peace (though there have apparently been some 21, 000+ acts of terrorism in the name of Islam since 9-11, alone). Who can even name more than a few committed in the name of Hinduism, Christianity, Buddhism, Sikhism, etc. in the last 50 years? The media masters do a really effective job of propagandizing Christians as poorly spoken, white trash, racist, homophobic, confederate flag waving hate mongerers. The pysops used to manipulate the masses is very effective. It's created a culture of people that never question what they're told, what they read, or see in television and movies. Christians are never represented fairly, thus it's not surprising that they've become the counter culture.
Who do you think are the ones going to the Middle East and Africa and helping starving people and those dying from AIDS (missionaries)? Christians do more charitable work than any other group, but mainstream culture in insistent on perpetuating the myth that Christianity is an evil, stifling, archaic belief system that only causes harm to others. It's a crock of crap.
Two ironic trends in our culture right now are the inverted cross (which is used as an anti-christian symbol -- though it is actually the cross of St. Peter:
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Cross_of_St._Peter), and those Guy Fawkes masks people wear at protests. Michael Coren had an amusing comment re this: "Those Guy Fawkes masks are meant to resemble one Guido Fawkes, an English Roman Catholic who received his military training in Spain, and who tried to blow up the British Parliament. Beyond the royal family, politicians and establishment, many ordinary people would have been slaughtered. Fawkes was a conservative Catholic, and would have run lefty twits through with his rapier after telling them what morons they were.
The above are just two examples of how out of touch many atheists and liberals are with history.
"Canada has a lot of freedoms due to the modern bit of legislature in 1982 called the Charter of Rights and Freedoms. And it exists in spite of so-called judeo-christian beliefs."
Freedom of conscience, freedom of religion, freedom of thought, freedom of belief, freedom of expression. Those are pretty Christian concepts.
Dylan an iconoclast? Didn't he have his own 'coming to Jesus' moment? That totally ruins his cred. I'm sure that's something most of his liberal fan base would like to ignore.
No need to respond to any of this. Just let it be rhetorical. I don't want this conversation to drag on indefinitely.
Anyway, can we please get back to talking about Yonge St?