News   Mar 09, 2026
 150     0 
News   Mar 09, 2026
 296     0 
News   Mar 06, 2026
 1.9K     7 

Education Director Proposes Boys-Only School

unimaginative2

Senior Member
Member Bio
Joined
Apr 23, 2007
Messages
4,554
Reaction score
13
Location
New York
Toronto education director wants school for boys
October 20, 2009

Louise Brown

Kristin Rushowy

Toronto Star


Suddenly, it's all about boys in Toronto public schools.

Weeks after taking the reins of Canada's largest school board, education director Chris Spence has brought his trademark focus on boys to a sweeping "Vision of Hope!" he unveiled Tuesday evening to trustees.

The one-time football player says he wants the board to launch a number of single-sex classes, boy-friendly programs and an all-male alternative school to try to boost male learning and cut boys' dropout rate.

It is among a range of priorities he sets for the Toronto District School Board, as well as going green, turning digital, balancing the books and cutting violence.

"The last thing I want to do is demonize our boys, but all around we see great concerns about their learning," he said, citing lower test scores than girls and more acting out. To level the playing field for boys, he suggests, "might require differentiated treatment."

Next September, he wants the board to open a Male Leadership Academy for boys from kindergarten to Grade 3 as a sort of alternative school or "school of choice," and add a grade each year, with many, if not all teachers being male.

Moreover, he wants to launch 300 "demonstration classrooms" across the city to showcase the best ways of teaching, including classrooms he calls "boy-friendly."

"Boys thrive in environments that are hands-on and where there is opportunity to move around," he said, citing portable desks that let children be more mobile, and clipboards rather than notebooks so students feel less tied to a desk.

"When every bone in a boy's body says `Move!' we're (usually) saying `Sit down.'."

The Toronto board has a handful of single-sex classrooms and an all-girls high school for students at risk, but Spence wants to expand the model, which he promoted at two schools in Hamilton.

"Male teachers would be value-added," he said, citing the importance of male mentors for boys, particularly in communities where father figures are absent.

"They say a boy without a father figure is like an explorer without a map," said Spence, who has pioneered mentoring programs for boys.

"One of the most reliable predictors of whether a boy will succeed or fail in high school rests on a single question: does he have a man in his life to look up to?"

The advocacy group People for Education has raised concerns about specialty schools "because of the tendency for that to divide populations, as opposed to bringing populations together," said spokesperson Annie Kidder, citing research in Britain and Canada that shows a system of specialty schools can lead to "a fair amount of social segregation."

Toronto board chair John Campbell said he expects Spence's plan to meet with little resistance next week when it comes up for approval by trustees. "We went through a long search to get a very capable agent of change, and we got one."

The scope of the report, presented to the board's planning and priorities committee Tuesday, is broad.

Spence says he wants all schools wireless by 2015.

He wants 20 per cent fewer students suspended each year, 20 per cent less violence and 40 per cent fewer expulsions.

And Spence will propose the board begin a community review of the future of schools in eight different neighbourhoods where declining enrolment is a problem, to be named next week. These reviews would give priority to keeping open schools from kindergarten to Grade 8, rather than middle schools and junior high schools.

"I am deeply committed to the model of kindergarten-to-Grade 8 which the board adopted as a model last year and which presents fewer transitions for children," said Spence.

Spence's plan also urges the board to:

— Launch five "redevelopment projects" with mixed use of school property to generate capital funding;

— Hire a marketing director to boost enrolment, including a drive to recruit more fee-paying international students;

— Reduce violent incidents by 20 per cent;

— Establish a Parent Academy, similar to one in Miami, where parents can receive training in a range of subjects;

— Install solar energy systems on up to 20 schools each year;

— Promote "full-service" schools with community use.

thestar.com
 
bad idea. doesn't surprise me though from a school board that brought us all kinds of segregation based schools such as ethnicity based (native), sexual orientation based (gay), continental origin based (afrocentric), etc. the public board seems bent on dividing people based on features they inherited and have no control over.

the most important thing you can get from school is social integration. and i was mad at the catholic board for having me sheltered most of my life in a catholic bubble. i can imagine, actually i know how these kids will feel when they get out into the real world: awkward. some people will adjust, a process that can take many years and some won't.

but hey, it's okay to to sacrifice social skills for supposedly increasing ones education. 20 years from now when these boys are all grown up, instead of going out on friday night and meeting a woman to spend the rest of their lives with, they can sit alone in their rooms and calculate the diameter of their penises based on the circumference. remember kids, diameter = circumference divided by 3.14.
 
Last edited:
I wish they had this 10 years ago when I was in high school... A great ratio of boys to girls!
 
I wish they had this 10 years ago when I was in high school... A great ratio of boys to girls!

unless you got sent to the all boys school. be careful what you wish for. :p
 
That's the great ratio I was talking about... ;)

but they already got a school for that. but even that can backfire, you could end up going to school with 95% enrollment of lesbians. if you're a gay male, where's the fun in that? ;)


i say keep/make the schools mixed, just like society. that way there's something for everyone.
 
I know people who have taught in all-boy (religious) school. It's a cesspool for insanity. Boys need girls to keep them in line.

And I'm sick of this TDSB stupidity. They complain about shutting down schools because there's not enough kids in Toronto. Yet at the same time, Afro-centric specialty schools??

Sheesh.
 
If they have an afro-centric school, religious schools, ESL schools, French immersion schools, and boys schools... the boy's school is going to be the White & Asian Anglo Male school. I'm sure this will really help race relations and removing gender bias. Who needs an elite private boys school if you can use race, religion, language, neighbourhood, and gender to segregate and get almost the same result.
 
Obviously, for every Boys only Class/School created there will be an equal number of Girls only units coming on stream. Is that a good thing or did these brain donors even notice this consequence of their little experiment?

Just imagine the gender wars that will ensue. Their school is bigger than ours, their school has more washrooms or whatever.

The whole premise fits into the TDSB drive to defeat standardised testing of students and ultimately teachers and the board. This segregation of the student body would provide yet another variable that should be exempted from testing.

TBSB, the time has come to cut the fat in the system, thank OISE for their interest, stand up to the unions and start teaching.
 
While I went to a mixed public school, the poor first gen immigrant that I am, many of my friends who went to both single-sex private schools and mixed schools say that it is definitely better for academics in the single-sex school. Less distractions and showing off. On the other hand, they felt that they got much better socialized in the mixed school. Yes, single sex private schools are often full of crazy kids, but they attributed that to the fact that those kids were spoiled rich kids with crazy parents, ie. not a function of the single-sex school concept.

My idea: mixed schools with mostly single sex classes. A best-of-both-worlds type of scenario. Opinions?
 
Well, one thing about boys-only schools: it enables shirts-vs-skins schoolyard games without guilt. (Okay, maybe less so in a post-Brandi Chastain era.)
 
Used to be that at 16 years, the ones who didn't want to be in school left to join the real world. Now that they are being forced to stay in school until they graduate grade 12, they take out their frustration on others.

They should send those kids who don't want to learn, into the segregated school, so that those that want to learn can.
 
I'm a product of a Catholic all-boys high school, and I'm wholeheartedly in favour of the TDSB opening up its own all-boys schools. There's a great camaraderie that is peculiar to all-boys schools, I do think academics are improved, and it tends to cut down on a lot of the behaviour issues.

And it's not like there's no chance whatsoever for a student at an all-boys school to interact with girls. The single-sex schools tend to do a lot of things together (teams/organizations, dances, fundraisers, etc) so that there's ample opportunity for mixing.
 
It's not like kids in the neighbourhood are going to be forced to go to this school, so yeah, go ahead. The TDSB already has a girls-only high school for at-risk students.

In any case, this isn't exactly new/innovative. The "neighbourhood" Catholic high schools in the area I grew up were (and still are) single-sex - Brebeuf College (guys) and St. Joseph Morrow Park (girls). Grads from single-sex schools aren't messed up due to the "lack of interaction" either - pretty much EVERYONE on my dad's side (his generation and mine) are products of a single-sex education, both here in Toronto (BSS for me, St. Mike's for my cousins) and in Hong Kong.
 
I spent my last four years of high school at a single sex school. I wouldn't necessarily extrapolate my experience to others, but it could probably do well for some people. From my observations, no one had any kind of bizarre or atypical social development due to the single gender environment (we were boys, not hormone driven retards) and I think it may have done some less confident people well by avoiding some kind of potential fear of sexual humiliation. I'm less sure of the current state of pedagogy with regards to single sex education. Males and females are different, so I suppose at some rudimentary level it would make sense to teach them differently.

The one thing I'm concerned by though is that this will just be an excuse for the TDSB to sequester the dumbest males in the system in some kind of quarantine. If students don't want to learn, no educational reform will change that. Introducing metal working, longer gym classes or some such stereotypically "male" activity probably won't help students where it matters (maths, sciences, writing, social sciences...). Girls didn't close the gender gap in maths (and open up a whole tin of whoop ass on males) because people in the 80s decided they would be better at Home Ec and Needlework than real courses.

I generally like this educational specialization though, even if some of the particular schemes seem doomed to failure (i.e. the ecojustice alternative school). As long as students get the requisite skills to succeed, who the hell cares if they learn it on a donkey? The more experiments the more we can learn how different students learn best. All we need now is better and more comprehensive standardized testing schemes to properly compare across different variables.
 

Back
Top