Toronto Bathurst Quay Revitalization | ?m | ?s | City of Toronto | Kearns Mancini

kweku said:
Those Silos are eyesore to the waterfront
Toronto lacks travel-to-see landmarks at the waterfront already, those silos must be thrown to the bush somewhere far away from the waterfront.
Click to expand...
Are you serious? The potential of those silos and the story they tell about our waterfront are exactly ripe for a "travel-to-see landmark."
 
JasonParis said:
Are you serious? The potential of those silos and the story they tell about our waterfront are exactly ripe for a "travel-to-see landmark."
Click to expand...

I have to agree with the original poster. I wouldn't be upset if they came down clearing the way for more greenspace and unlocked views vs a museum about alcohol that only the few get to enjoy.
 
JasonParis said:
Are you serious? The potential of those silos and the story they tell about our waterfront are exactly ripe for a "travel-to-see landmark."
Click to expand...
Added emphasis! The silos remind us (and tourists) that Toronto's formation was as a port city. They (and the ones at Parliament) should/could certainly be 'tidied up" but definitely not knocked down - or allowed to crumble!
 
Edward Skira said:
A museum dedicated to UT or at least to me! I worked for Canada Malting here for three summers back in the day.
Click to expand...

Ed your bronze statue is funded and underway, but before fabrication... could u send a more recent photo than supplied? I understand the temptation (hurts to age), but a recent shot might yield a more majestic, memorable profile.
 
JasonParis said:
Are you serious? The potential of those silos and the story they tell about our waterfront are exactly ripe for a "travel-to-see landmark."
Click to expand...

Honestly, if you are counting on Silos to become travel-to-see-landmark on your waterfront, then you need Jesus to save your city's architecture.
Silos belong to farm lands not urban centers and I don't think anyone would wake up in the morning anywhere in the world and scream in excitement to their kids that "We are going to see silos"

Toronto has already missed several opportunities to make our waterfront an envy of the world but admitting several bland gray glass slabs that should have been built in Markham or Milton
We cannot become a joke of the world by embracing old farm land structures containing dangerous gases to litter out waterfront
 
Last edited:
Those aren't just any old farm silo. They were innovative when they were put up and have been designated as heritage structures for a reason. And given that grain was brought to the silos by ship, Markham wouldn't have been a great choice. :rolleyes:
 
I distinctly remember the gross, flour-ey smell from the silos when passing by on the Gardiner as a kid in the 80's...
 
kweku said:
Honestly, if you are counting on Silos to become travel-to-see-landmark on your waterfront, then you need Jesus to save your city's architecture.
Silos belong to farm lands not urban centers and I don't think anyone would wake up in the morning anywhere in the world and scream in excitement to their kids that "We are going to see silos"

Toronto has already missed several opportunities to make our waterfront an envy of the world but admitting several bland gray glass slabs that should have been built in Markham or Milton
We cannot become a joke of the world by embracing old farm land structures containing dangerous gases to litter out waterfront
Click to expand...

Let's dispel a few silly misconceptions here.

No one's counting on these silos to save the waterfront all on their own. Let's not pretend otherwise, OK? But let me just say in passing that plenty of cities have done spectacular things to buildings which were once a vital part of their industry - think of London's handling of the Battersea Power Station, for example. The continued existence of such transformed structures speaks of a legacy and a sense of history of their respective cities as entities which evolve in interesting and vital ways.

You see some crumbling old "farm land structures." Wrong! There was no farm here. They were there specifically to service the grain shipping industry... yes, our city has a history of being a port, too! It was once a very important part of the city's commercial life.

I think you're suffering from a lack of imagination. You clearly have no idea what potentially could be done with these silos; all I see is someone whose impatience eclipses all else.

I don't even know what you expect should go in place of those silos anyway.... we know you don't like much of what you see in contemporary Toronto, so perhaps you'll enlighten us all about what precisely the city needs in place of the silos?
 
You must log in or register to post here.

Back
Top