M II A II R II K
Senior Member
They should just bury the Spadina route and widen the sidewalks.
As someone who has to carry an iPhone and a BB10, I would agree that the BB10 tends to get connected faster. There are coverage holes at some stops though where you pretty much have to stick your phone out of the door to hope to acquire a signal before the door closes.According the the people I talked to from tConet they said Iphones take the longest to cont to it and that Androids are generally faster. Most of the time I have no problem connecting to it quick enough for apps to send stuff through or for part of a youtube video to upload.
The shame about the 510 is that it could be used as somewhat of a relief for the University line, but since both Transportation Services and the TTC insist on crippling streetcar service in this city, it's not even close to a priority.
The NIMBYs who refuse to give up walking one block to the next streetcar or bus stop, even though it would speed up public transit. Especially, when there are four doors available on the new streetcars, with the rear most door being 30 m (98 feet) from the front door.
Though I completely agree that there are sometimes too many stops on surface routes, there are many people who use transit who really cannot walk too far due to health or age reasons. The TTC has phased-out quite a few streetcar stops, despite the inevitable NIMBYism.That's the very reason why I'm vary of the surface LRTs in this city. The stop spacing is too prone to NIMBY manipulation and its politicians love to advertise projects with as many number of stops as possible.
New York governor declares state of emergency for NYC subway system
Gov. Andrew Cuomo said the dismal performance of the system was no longer acceptable.
From Star.
My impression was that it still had obscenely frequently spaced stops, that it really did spent more time stopping than moving, and that the dive & loop at St Clair West wasted about 4-6 minutes each time and costed billions to the economy in productivity.
It's a good idea and probably fairly easy to implement but I think it is really not a priority for 'today'. The TTC needs to get the new gates installed, the PRESTO system working properly and deal with major things like proper route management and getting the 'collectors' redeployed before 'nice but not essential' things like better marked subway entrances.Ttc should think about alphabetising their subway entrances especially in dt.
Not only will this make it people to navigate around but it will improve loading patterns as people will know which car to be in to optimize their travel distance when they get off. These small touches is what really makes or breaks a good system
It's a good idea and probably fairly easy to implement but I think it is really not a priority for 'today'. The TTC needs to get the new gates installed, the PRESTO system working properly and deal with major things like proper route management and getting the 'collectors' redeployed before 'nice but not essential' things like better marked subway entrances.
What grabbed my non-engineer's eye is that the excavation of the old trackbed went fairly deep. I guess that means they are hoping to stabilise the subgrade and make it last a little longer. That's good news - there is hope that this track will be capable of a little more speed, and will have fewer emerging slow orders, than in the past. Maybe with the right traffic priority, it will deserve to be considered LRT quality one day.
- Paul
View attachment 113771 View attachment 113772 View attachment 113773
Such data is readily available. New York has more passengers than Toronto, but they have where near 28 more times passengers!! Closer to 2.8 times more passengers. It's a huge difference.Sure those systems appear to have tons of delays when you initially look at the numbers, but the only way to truly compare if if you had stats of the number of delays each system had relative to the amount of passengers it serves, and to the amount of passenger kilometer traveled