News   Dec 20, 2024
 749     4 
News   Dec 20, 2024
 622     2 
News   Dec 20, 2024
 1K     0 

Miscellany Toronto Photographs: Then and Now

King St. E., south side, east of present Victoria St.
TN King St. E., Yonge to Church Sts., south side, from west to east of present Victoria St. 1895.jpg


TN King St. E. east of Victoria.jpg

Google street view
 

Attachments

  • TN King St. E., Yonge to Church Sts., south side, from west to east of present Victoria St. 1895.jpg
    TN King St. E., Yonge to Church Sts., south side, from west to east of present Victoria St. 1895.jpg
    636.3 KB · Views: 1,902
  • TN King St. E. east of Victoria.jpg
    TN King St. E. east of Victoria.jpg
    407.8 KB · Views: 921
I found this photo during a google search, the interesting thing is the building built into the bridge abutment. Does anyone know anything about this building? The after photo shows that it's till there and looking pretty much intact.
streetcar-4115-14.jpg

Blr rail brg.jpg
 

Attachments

  • streetcar-4115-14.jpg
    streetcar-4115-14.jpg
    134.2 KB · Views: 1,176
  • Blr rail brg.jpg
    Blr rail brg.jpg
    220.1 KB · Views: 1,160
Looks like a pre-existing building that was given a "basement entrance" in the process of grade separation.
 
I agree that the street in the Depression era looks in much better shape than now. I don't live near the area but what I always find striking about older buildings is the level of decoration that went into even the industrial building seen in the photos, window frames and cornices for example. The apartment buildings are typical of the '70s and '80s, plain boxes that would even bore a communist architect.
Back to the building in question. In a city that has torn down buildings to widen Dundas St. or completely demolished a neighbourhood for the Gardner, why was this building kept? Why was a door and windows put in the abutment when, if a basement was there, a wall could of sufficed? The windows themselves are interesting, they are too high to be viewed through from the street and probably as well from the inside. Could this be an Icehouse?
 
Is this before the before?

Yes it's the same location but I don't think it's the same building but the "before before" photo does give me an idea. The utility poles on the right I believe are telephone, these poles are now missing from the 1932 photo, so perhaps the mystery entrance is one to a sub-exchange vault? Or could it be for a electrical transformer vault? Either could make sense, you would need some ventilation for cooling but not be easily accessible for people to enter = an explanation for the windows up high. Getting closer with Google street view to the today view shows a metal door and possible metal plates in the windows, which would be needed for a transformer vault.
The building was owned by Meredith, Simmons & Company which produced industrial adhesives on that site, an activity that needs quite a bit of power. So maybe this is the transformer vault that serviced the building or the area.
Anyone know someone at THEC or Bell that could look into this?
 
Looks like a pre-existing building that was given a "basement entrance" in the process of grade separation.

Rather than buy the business the property negotiator for the City said to Greenaways "We are putting in an underpass so you won't have access out the front main floor any more. We'll give you a basement entrance to the new sidewalk and you can still ship your Flour, Feed and Potatoes out the rear."
 
Rather than buy the business the property negotiator for the City said to Greenaways "We are putting in an underpass so you won't have access out the front main floor any more. We'll give you a basement entrance to the new sidewalk and you can still ship your Flour, Feed and Potatoes out the rear."

Yes Rusty, that seems like a logical scenario.
And I agree that Greenaway's is the same building as in the previous photos (Meredith).
 
I think I got to the bottom of this little mystery hole in the wall. The building was a storage warehouse owned by the CNR that had a basement. When CNR and the city pulled their money together to build an underpass CNR just added an extra bit to the job to put in the access to the basement. I found this notice on another website:
upload_2017-2-6_13-2-23.png

(from The Toronto Globe, 7March 1930, as seen on www.cnr-in-ontario.com)
With a little supposition I think that CNR made the entrance for themselves and then later sold off the building as surplus.

Is the "Meredith" building and the "Greenaways" building? I see some differences between the two that would suggest that they are not but perhaps the first could have been renovated to the second. The fascias between the two are different as well as one being a peaked roof and the other flat.
 

Attachments

  • upload_2017-2-6_13-2-23.png
    upload_2017-2-6_13-2-23.png
    37.2 KB · Views: 862
North-east corner of Queen and Victoria Streets, 1919

TN Queen-and-Victoria Streets N-E corner 1919.jpg


The whole block is today's location of St. Michael's Hospital and will soon include an additional Patient Care Tower.

TN Queen-and-Victoria.jpg
 

Attachments

  • TN Queen-and-Victoria Streets N-E corner 1919.jpg
    TN Queen-and-Victoria Streets N-E corner 1919.jpg
    447.8 KB · Views: 1,558
  • TN Queen-and-Victoria.jpg
    TN Queen-and-Victoria.jpg
    242.7 KB · Views: 881
From fancy sexy houses to crime ridden ugly slum tenements.. Yay for crappy housing projects.

I wish those houses were still there..
It's a shame all the lost wrought iron work, both on roof tops and fence around properties. A lost art.
 

Back
Top