"Mr. Levy, at Ryerson, is pushing the city to allow the block north of Dundas to evolve into a “digital media zone” meant to attract high-tech entrepreneurs and extend the glitzy electronic vibe of Dundas Square north to College. “It’s time for the city to take the initiative,” he says.
That’s a contentious idea, and one candidate running to succeed Mr. Rae, Kristyn Wong-Tam, feels it’s important the city not forget about local apartment dwellers. “Yonge belongs to the neighbourhood and the business owners,” she says. "
I thought Wong-Tam's comment was puzzling, sort of reflexively anti-development. For one thing, 'apartment dwellers are not owners'...secondly, where are these apartment dwellers exactly who would object to this area being upgraded? The 2nd & 3rd floor occupants of commercial properties fronting Yonge? Anyway, it just seemed like a an odd note from a candidate - perhaps the first-ever argument against intensifying and upgrading Yonge & Dundas. Also, what does she mean saying "Yonge belongs to the neighbourhood"? That is meaningless. The street & sidewalks belong to the city, and the properties belong to whoever has title. Her tone is vaguely Marxist, even though she's not really saying anything.