|
|
|
Most, IMO, will not even have SSM on their radar, like myself
Recent posts on this thread illustrate why I'm glad this vote came up in the House of Commons. It will serve as the determining vote once and for all, unlike the vote rammed through earlier. The issue is now settled. If Harper can say that (no doubt with a sigh of relief), it's surely appropriate now for the rest of us to say it, and move on.
Ah, so now over 5 million Conservative voters in 2006, and likely over 6 million voters in 2007 are lazy? Who's the bigot?
Yeah, me and the other 5,374,071 Canadians who voted Conservative, equal to 36.3% of the popular vote, with an increase of 6.7% from the previous election. Them's a lot of bigots, and they're growing - just watch 6 million or more voters in 2007.
Ah, so now over 5 million Conservative voters in 2006, and likely over 6 million voters in 2007 are lazy? Who's the bigot?I see. You were too lazy to find out what it is that you were voting for. Not really something to be proud of.
I just did, 36.3%.but please tell me what percentage of the popular vote the formentioned party attained,
I don't know what to say. If Conservatives are not Nazis, why bring up the latter? If Conservatives didn't fix the election that finally brought them into power, like the Nazis did, why bring them up? Why are we talking about Nazis for goodness sake?I meant the Nazis.
Damn those 5.5 million lazy, bigotted Canadians! What about the 4 million who voted Liberal, did they vote for four more years of Adscam'esque corruption, theft and cronyism? I think people vote for dozens of different reasons, many of which having more to do with the local candidate than the national position.Well, they either voted in favour of bigotry, or were too lazy to inquire as to what it was they were supporting. You've admitted to both - why are you so ashamed of what you did?
A fair question. I voted for Harper mostly to get rid of the old Liberal corrupt, adscam'ing machine, and the legacy of Quebecer PMs (let's give someone else a chance, eh?). That's not to say that I don't like Harper, as I like the GST cut, accountability act (if it ever passes) and proposed income splitting. Kennedy, I like because he's got no baggage, seems honest and he's not from Quebec. Most of all, I like him because he represents the new generation of MPs. Dion, on the other hand, reminds of a a poor man's version of Chrieten, with all the foreign accent and poor English, with a history in the last government that stole millions from us.In your opinion, what would Kennedy have in common with Harper that would enable you to vote for either one? Why would you not vote for Dion if you would vote for Kennedy?
Thanks. Actually, I voted Liberal lots of times. I voted for Jean Chrétien in 2000 (my first vote in Canada, couldn't wait to throw out Mulroney/Campbell), McGuinty in 2003 and Paul Martin in 2004. If Gerald Kennedy (IMO, an honest, youthful and intelligent guy with good leadership potential) had been elected Liberal leader, I might have voted for him in 2007 instead of Harper. As is, Dion is going to get murdered.Abeja de Almirante's not all bad. Remember, he keeps telling us he voted Liberal at one time.
