News   Jan 09, 2025
 98     0 
News   Jan 09, 2025
 270     0 
News   Jan 08, 2025
 1.1K     0 

WAJID KHANs MISSISSAUGA

  • Thread starter The Mississauga Muse
  • Start date
Lucky to never have had a Conservative MP. I've had two Conservative MPPs though - one excellent (Bill Davis) and one who was one of the biggest little shits ever - Tony Clement. Having an asswipe like Clement as your rep makes one angry (his gift to Brampton was the long delayed hospital that became a P3 hospital, further delayed thanks to that).

My current Liberal MP is a Hockey Hall of Famer. I doubt he'll be defeated by a conservative or cross the floor - he's Mr. Integrity. My MPP is a old Liberal Cabinet Minister who I could never see cross the floor either.
 
Re: WAJID KHANs MISSISSAUGA

bizorky wrote:

You should phone up and ask for your vote back. I once did that with my city councillor. The request actually stumped him for a second.

WOW! stumped your councillor for a second? That means your councillor was actually THINKING for a second about what you actually SAID!

What municipality did that happen in?


Signed,
The Mississauga Muse
 
Re: WAJID KHANs MISSISSAUGA

adma shared this pic

KOTH6560.jpg


and wrote:

Yeah, he decided that if you can't beat those Conservative redneck hilbillies, join'em

"Conservative redneck hilbillies".... actually, adma, it's come a point where I don't see that much difference (at least Provincially) between Liberal rule or Conservative.

I sat in on the clause-by-clause Standing Committee deliberations on Bill 130 last month and I swear.... the four "Liberals"?...

...if I hadn't have known that's what they were, I'd have planted down money in a bet that they were Conservatives. One Conservative mouthpiece and three arms that went up when they were needed during voting.

I've just so had it with the political process. And I understand completely why people loathe politicians. And why dealing with them is so "corrosive to the soul" --as Jon Stewart once observed.
 
BETRAYED. I don't really care though cuz I didn't vote for him anyways, though it sucks being officially represent by a Conservative MP now. All this floor-crossing just proves that Liberals and Conservatives are the same and I will probably never vote for either party. **** them both.
 
WOW! stumped your councillor for a second? That means your councillor was actually THINKING for a second about what you actually SAID!

What municipality did that happen in?

Well Muse, I believe that he was actually thinking about his recent trip to Florida (or something like that).

This surprising (and I know it is surprising) event took place some years back in Ottawa.

I thought my comment was a funny (but useless) thing to say at the time. It was in response to his suggestion that he could do nothing with respect to certain persistent issues (I was asking him to call the city works department to get rid of ice on sidewalks in my neighbourhood. My calls had not worked, so I thought maybe he could get results. The solution came when spring arrived).
 
It gets better and better - Probably a good thing for the Liberals that this swine is no longer in their ranks.

Liberal MP wants Khan on carpet

January 16, 2007
Canadian Press
OTTAWA — Liberal MP Albina Guarnieri wants the Commons foreign affairs committee to summon Wajid Khan to explain a $13,000 trip he took to the Middle East and the secret report he wrote about it for Prime Minister Stephen Harper.

Khan, a former Liberal MP who defected earlier this month to the Tories, has been serving as Harper’s special adviser on the Middle East and South Asia since the summer.

When he first took on the role, Khan promised that his findings and recommendations would be made available to MPs from all parties. However, the prime minister’s office has since insisted that the report must remain confidential.

Guarnieri, who represents a neighbouring riding to Khan’s in Mississauga-Streetsville, said there is no justification for keeping the report secret.

“He’s not a privy councillor so he’s not bound by any oath of secrecy. And he’s not a private citizen,†she said in an interview.

Khan was acting as a member of Parliament when he spent 19 days in September touring Syria, Jordan, Saudi Arabia, Israel and Lebanon. Consequently, Guarnieri said taxpayers have a right to know whether they got any value for their money.

“Canadians who paid for Mr. Khan’s trip didn’t even get a comment card,†she said.

Privately, Conservatives are accusing the Liberals of a double standard. They noted that former Liberal prime minister Paul Martin never released any reports from his many special advisers, not even when they were requested through Access to Information.

Guarnieri forwarded a motion Tuesday to the clerk of the foreign affairs committee, asking that the committee summon Khan to discuss his trip and his report. It will be considered when the committee resumes work at the end of the month.

The three opposition parties hold a combined majority of seats on the committee and Guarnieri said she can’t imagine any opposition MPs not supporting her motion.

Khan could decline the invitation to appear before the committee but Guarnieri said the continued refusal to release or even talk about his report raises questions about the value of his work.

“Is there nothing worth publishing?â€

Liberals suspect the report, if it even exists, may be superficial or that it may have been written by a foreign affairs bureaucrat.

Sam Hanson, the bureaucrat who accompanied Khan on his trip, refused today to talk to a reporter, saying, “I have no such authorization.â€

Harper’s newest MP has been causing the prime minister grief on another front as well.

It was revealed this week that Khan’s Toronto car dealership loaned $268,000 to Khan’s former Liberal riding association and to Khan’s election campaigns in 2004 and 2006.

At the time, candidates were legally prohibited from accepting more than $1,000 in corporate donations and could personally donate no more than $5,000 to their own campaigns.

They could legally take out loans but Liberal officials say Khan’s loans could be deemed illegal contributions if his former Liberal association, now officially defunct and deeply in debt, is unable to repay them.

The loans came to light only after Elections Canada delisted the Liberal association in Khan’s riding last month for failing to file its annual financial reports in 2004 and 2005. The reports were subsequently filed and the watchdog agency is now reviewing them, along with an NDP request to investigate the alleged financial irregularities.

Harper’s communications director, Sandra Buckler, has said the prime minister was unaware of any problems in the riding when he welcomed Khan into the Tory fold. And she intimated that the financial dealings of Khan’s former association is a Liberal problem.

But the Liberals insist they too had no inkling of the problems until this week. They are setting up a new Liberal association in the riding, which won’t be burdened by the debts piled up under Khan.

“Mr. Harper has welcomed Wajid Khan and all the key payers (in his former riding association) so they’re his problems now,†said Guarnieri.
 
the state of politicians in mississauga definitely leaves little to be desired. of all the politicians that represent mississauga residents (including those who rep both brampton and mississauga) federally or provincially, i can think of two...just two...who could actually have the word "quality" attached to them:

navdeep bains and omar alghabra

the rest are lucky to be associated with the word "meh".
 
I voted for Khan because I thought he was the best man for the job. His switching sides has not changed my opinion on him, If anything it has only reinforced it. Even Harper believed Khan was the right man.
 
What do you mean Khan didnt think so? If he didnt think so he wouldnt have continued being an advisor on the middle east for Harper.

Dion basically forced Khan out of the Liberal party and I think that is worse than Khan just switching sides. The Liberals could have had some say in Canada's foreign policy under the conservatives had they allowed Khan to continue serving as an advisor.
 
Wajid Khan just want to be part of the ruling party, not matter which party it is. He is just an opportunists.

Being an advisor to an opposing party on foreign affairs is not so incredibly important that you are forced to switch parties. Your party is supposed to represent your beliefs and ideals; it is not something should change like your jeans or your T-shirt.
 
What do you mean Khan didnt think so? If he didnt think so he wouldnt have continued being an advisor on the middle east for Harper.

Khan's first responsibility was to his constituents. He ran and was voted in as a Liberal. This would suggest that he acknowledged the Liberal Party platform as part of his political beliefs. By changing his mind on which party he wanted to belong to, he was clearly stating that he was no longer the right man for the job as a Liberal member of Parliament. Either that or he misrepresented himself to get elected - which is the point doady is making.

As to whether he is the right person for the job as an MP, that will be up to the voters in the next election.
 

Back
Top