I love it how mods and admins are told how to do their jobs. Incitement may not lead to happy results.
Actually I just posted elsewhere that you guys are treating me nicer lately. I'll be civil with you because there are others following along that might not understand the situation.
A recap... this is the real definition of "incitement"...
any posting that dared to mention the area and development found in that court decision was removed. Any link to an outside forum was removed. Extreme focus on silencing the issue caused me to question the mods and the motive behind the removal(s). Those questions were removed as well. I asked for an explanation privately and none was given. I was banned. With no explanation. Should I have just gone away quietly? One thread Sean... one thread started it all.
I HAVE A RIGHT TO QUESTION A MODERATOR'S DECISION AND A RIGHT TO ASK WHICH MODERATOR MADE SAID DECISION.
To date, not one of you has come forward or provided commentary in a single thread, where discussion and debate can openly take place on this TORONTO ISSUE. Bash me all you want. As long as I have the right to come back at you.
In the meantime, Sean, you were proven wrong in the Keele/Wilson thread (where you censored my reply to you - still looks bad on ya). The Auditor General, City Council, and now the courts are aware of the problems. Why are you guys incapable of acknowledging that? Keele Wilson is a time bomb. Good luck guys.
Going back to your quote above... you don't work for the city do you? That line reeks of 'stay out of my business'. I come across that attitude a lot. Tsk, tsk.
Anyway, my previous post ending was a real offer. If you want to talk over beer, I'm in that area at least once a week. My stats... 32, 6'0, 185, dirty blond, fucking cute/handsome and not gay (sorry to a few of you here). I'm not scared to meet ya! PM me and we'll set something up.