micheal_can
Senior Member
Finally, a Via Rail CEO that seems to sing my tune.
Finally, a Via Rail CEO that seems to sing my tune.
Finally, a Via Rail CEO that seems to sing my tune.
I am not holding my breath waiting for anything, but just like the person who sand the song of HxR and it had many people liking the tune, this tune is something I like. Whether anything substantive happens will be up to the federal government to do. I doubt anything will be added to this federal budget, but it would be nice.Well, only part way. That interview repeatedly uses the term "replace", never uses the term "expand". The CEO makes one reference to "more communities" which does not necessarily mean "more trains" or "more routes".
Googling "National Dream Via Rail Canada" takes one to pages from advocacy groups, but we have yet to see what VIA's pitch actually is.
There's a thread on groups.io about how the parliamentary Transport Committee crossed the street to avoid endorsing a fleet replacement.
The latest VIA CEO's interview reminds me of the interviews with YDS in 2014-2015 about HFR. We can see how the pace quickened after those.
- Paul
Well, only part way. That interview repeatedly uses the term "replace", never uses the term "expand". The CEO makes one reference to "more communities" which does not necessarily mean "more trains" or "more routes".
Googling "National Dream Via Rail Canada" takes one to pages from advocacy groups, but we have yet to see what VIA's pitch actually is.
There's a thread on groups.io about how the parliamentary Transport Committee crossed the street to avoid endorsing a fleet replacement.
The latest VIA CEO's interview reminds me of the interviews with YDS in 2014-2015 about HFR. We can see how the pace quickened after those.
- Paul
What the next government will do is key. However, having a CEO who wants more than status quo is a start. For all we know, the CPC could privatize VIA.Not sure how relevant any of this is. The next government will determine what gets funded. How enthusiastic is the CPC about fleet renewal at VIA? Do they have a large enough caucus to support HFR? There's a lot of talk from people who don't have the power to execute the visions they are sharing.
No, and the private partnership I believe means that there are simply requirements set for the consortium picked to meet, such as speed, car size, etc and they just pick or make whatever they deem necessary.Interesting article in La Presse on the long distance fleet renewal
![]()
Trains vétustes | VIA Rail demande des milliards à Ottawa pour éviter le pire
VIA Rail Canada aura besoin de milliards de dollars du gouvernement fédéral pour remplacer ses trains de longues distances, qui arriveront à leur fin de vie utile d’ici 2035. La société d’État craint de devoir procéder à des coupes majeures dans le service si rien n’est fait.www.lapresse.ca
The article mentions the Venture sets being for the HFR project. Has this been confirmed ?
Who is winding down what's left of non-corridor rail service?
I must have missed that announcement.
There is no highway (or road) to Churchhill, MB and building one would likely cost more than replacing the entire LD Fleet........
I think we're getting a bit ahead of ourselves here......
Moving this here since this isn’t Corridor-related, but VIA has officially confirmed that the Status Quo (i.e., in absence of a new long-distance fleet having arrived by then) would mean that its non-Corridor operations will disappear in 2035:HEP cars (just like LRC cars) are already permanently withdrawn one-by-one on an almost monthly basis and VIA already doesn’t have the fleet to reintroduce trains 3/4 (the third summer-only EDMO-VCVR frequency) or to add additional peak Sleeper capacity on the Ocean and Churchill trains. At the same time, TC seems determined to not tolerate HEPs in operation past 2035 (and I’m not sure how many cars would even last that long), meaning that the current trajectory (the “Do-nothing” or “Business-As-Usual” scenario) is that VIA’s non-Corridor services will steadily fade out and completely disappear over the next 12 years:
View attachment 542397
See... that's what happens when you try to squeeze out every last minute of these dinosaurs. They ignore the fact that procurement takes time money, and rely too much on just rebuild after rebuild until they fall apart. Now we are once again scrambling to find replacements and end up paying more. They should've replaced them 10 years ago. That's also another reason why via as a crown Corp is a dicey endeavor when it comes to procurement. They will never procure new equipment as part of a proactive fleet renewal and will push SLEPs over and over. Ironically it'll end up being more expensive over the service life to do the latter.Moving this here since this isn’t Corridor-related, but VIA has officially confirmed that the Status Quo (i.e., in absence of a new long-distance fleet having arrived by then) would mean that its non-Corridor operations will disappear in 2035:
![]()
Time is running out for Via Rail cars from a bygone era
The train cars and locomotives must be replaced or long-distance and inter-regional service will suffer, Via says.montrealgazette.com
![]()
VIA Rail routes in jeopardy due to outdated train cars | Watch News Videos Online
Watch VIA Rail routes in jeopardy due to outdated train cars Video Online, on GlobalNews.caglobalnews.ca
See... that's what happens when you try to squeeze out every last minute of these dinosaurs. They ignore the fact that procurement takes time money, and rely too much on just rebuild after rebuild until they fall apart. Now we are once again scrambling to find replacements and end up paying more. They should've replaced them 10 years ago. That's also another reason why via as a crown Corp is a dicey endeavor when it comes to procurement. They will never procure new equipment as part of a proactive fleet renewal and will push SLEPs over and over. Ironically it'll end up being more expensive over the service life to do the latter.
It's actually hilarious that their own PR team is mocking their own company. Have a 70 year old fleet as your mainline national railroad is not something to really boast about. It means that we are either cheap, dysfunctional or draconian. Either way it paints us in a negative spotlight especially when we want to attract new riders.I just thought this was an interesting post from VIA highlighting the age of the long distance fleet given recent news.




